Tooltip Generator not working for me so put it on a spell instead.
Basically you pick any class you want for the Hero Power, then you can build a deck however you wish with up to 5 class cards from any class, so you could build a deck with 5 Rogue, 5 Mage, 5 Warrior and 15 Neutrals for example.
Dang, I was gonna make that one (without the limit)
Shadows found a work-around that's obvious in hindsight: just don't initiate a line-break.
Also, don't use apostrophes! They appear as \'.
I suspect this probably applies to quotation marks ("), ampersand (&), greater than (>) and smaller than (<), as they are all reserved HTML characters.
Ok, I've been working on my class for about two weeks. However, there are no repeated hero powers in any classes posted here, so maybe you should consider changing yours ? :)
I'm afraid there are repeated Hero Powers, or at least very similar ones. For instance, Muddler's Swindler has almost the same HP as my Alchemist. Hero Powers have a very narrow design space, so I think it's okay if there are two similar or identic ones.
Brrrrrains can be cool as a removal tool or heal or even a combo piece to transform your board to chows and then swap healing for dmg and OTK your opponent. But that Classic watermark kills me ...
Yeah, Little Flower Shops is pretty cute :)
I also like Demonic Brand, cool effect and good art+name to compliment the flavor.
GL to all! Lets crack 2019 open :)
I never understand how people can get so triggered over the watermarks. These are custom cards. They aren't part of any existing Hearthstone expansion, even if their flavour or theme happen to be similar to one, so they don't have to have a specific watermark. Now if for example a zombie themed card would have a Kobolds and Catacombs watermark, then your frustration would be totally understandable.
As for the entries, I really like Spirit Cleanser, Oakshaping and Crystallize Soul.
The problem here is that it is referencing Zombie Chow, which did not exist when the classic set came out. So, in my opinion, classic mark is worse than K&C watermark, in this case.
As someone who is also using Kel'Thuzad, I think the mindset is that, if Kel'Thuzad existed as a playable class, he never would have been a playable card. Curse of Naxxramas would never have existed in its current form, overlapping heavily with the Lich class itself. If we're assuming the winning custom class existed from the beginning, we have to reassess everything.
This is quite interesting.
One idea I had for my class was that many of its spells were tagged as "Potion" (such as the Essence of Frost I showcased). However, I dismissed the idea because it would overlap with Kabal Chemist.
But with the "what if this class had existed from the beginning" mindset you display here, maybe Kabal Chemist would've had a different text (such as "Add a Potion from Mean Streets of Gadgetzan" or something like that). Or maybe the Kabal wouldn't have been alchemists in the first place.
As such, I wonder if I could include the Potion tag in future phases, given it's an important feature that wasn't included in the presentation of the class. I'd also like to know if you think the whole "Potion tag" thing is a good idea, but we'll discuss that when Phase II begins. All of these assuming I make it to Phase II, of course xD
4
The name is a reference to Yu-gi-oh!
0
If you are using Google Chrome on your phone, it has an option called "Display desktop version" or something like that.
With it, you can see the website as if you were using a PC, so you will be able to make it.
0
Sheep
Shares the artwork with another card (Polymorph).
0
Violet Teacher
Summons 1/1 tokens.
0
Dang, I was gonna make that one (without the limit)
0
Hemet Nesingwary
Terrible tech.
0
Also, don't use apostrophes! They appear as \'.
I suspect this probably applies to quotation marks ("), ampersand (&), greater than (>) and smaller than (<), as they are all reserved HTML characters.
0
I'm also having the same issue :/
Out of the Tavern Brawls presented so far, my preference is: Splitting the Ground > UNETHICAL EXPERIMENT > Troggs hate you!
0
Babbling Book
Cartoony look.
0
I'm afraid there are repeated Hero Powers, or at least very similar ones. For instance, Muddler's Swindler has almost the same HP as my Alchemist. Hero Powers have a very narrow design space, so I think it's okay if there are two similar or identic ones.
1
The problem here is that it is referencing Zombie Chow, which did not exist when the classic set came out. So, in my opinion, classic mark is worse than K&C watermark, in this case.
0
Jan'alai, the Dragonhawk
A green beast.
0
This is quite interesting.
One idea I had for my class was that many of its spells were tagged as "Potion" (such as the Essence of Frost I showcased). However, I dismissed the idea because it would overlap with Kabal Chemist.
But with the "what if this class had existed from the beginning" mindset you display here, maybe Kabal Chemist would've had a different text (such as "Add a Potion from Mean Streets of Gadgetzan" or something like that). Or maybe the Kabal wouldn't have been alchemists in the first place.
As such, I wonder if I could include the Potion tag in future phases, given it's an important feature that wasn't included in the presentation of the class. I'd also like to know if you think the whole "Potion tag" thing is a good idea, but we'll discuss that when Phase II begins. All of these assuming I make it to Phase II, of course xD
0
Goblin Bomb
0 Attack Deathrattle.
0
Knife Juggler
High-pitched voice.