Five Hearthstone Decks for Witchwood's New Meta You Should be Playing
Let's take a look at some high performing decks that you should check out if you haven't already. Are you having success with other decks? Share them in the comments below!
Maur1's Odd Rogue
|
|
---|---|
Minion (26)
|
Ability (4)
|
Loading Collection |
Good Token Druid
|
||
---|---|---|
Minion (4)
|
Ability (25)
|
Playable Hero (1) |
Loading Collection |
Good Even Elemental Shaman
|
||
---|---|---|
Minion (25)
|
Ability (4)
|
Playable Hero (1) |
Loading Collection |
Good Spell Hunter
|
||
---|---|---|
Ability (24)
|
Weapon (5)
|
Playable Hero (1) |
Loading Collection |
Good Taunt Warrior
|
||
---|---|---|
Minion (17)
|
Ability (11)
|
Weapon (2)
|
Loading Collection |
Bonus: Shudderwock Shaman
I know, you must think I'm crazy. ETC took the following list to #3 Legend in the Americas region.
|
||
---|---|---|
Minion (17)
|
Ability (12)
|
Playable Hero (1) |
Loading Collection |
Be careful not to play the 2 decks not marked as "good"
"You should" is just an expression, don't be a damn smart ass about it.
thanks so do you
Yes, craft him. With the addition of rush & lifesteal beasts, he is very strong. Also, you can almost always win the grind out games with him because that hero power is infinite value.
Honestly Token druid is very viable in the meta and I'm surprised it doesn't see more play.
Playing cheap taunts to finish quest quicker could have only been thought of by you. Maybe you were the first to post it, but don't make it like you are a Genius to come up with that idea.
regardless of whether it makes him a genuis or not, if he posted it first, then it kinda is his deck, unless someone can prove they made that exact tech and was playing it before he posted it. using the word genius as an insult doesn't make your point make any more sense, jackass
Dab on these haters! 😂😂😂😂😂
I'm surprised he got that many dislikes, he's just saying it was wierd that the writers used the word should, like in order to play hearthstone competitively, there was no choice but to use a deck online with no modification at all.
and idk, isn't that kinda wierd?
calm down with the snap dislikes a bit please...
Hunter deck is same as week 1 in December.
Thats cos its designed to be rhok'delar (so only spells) and super generic. hence 'good' spell hunter. Every deck that gets heavily teched is renamed as "good" cos they can't just put up a decklist with a bunch of empty 'insert tech option here's could they? The netdeckers would riot xP
I'm kidding, I understand they need to appeal to that audience which makes up a portion of hearthpwn's clickbase, fair enough. But imagine if they did do that (tech slots and all)? Then people wouldn't start assuming that only that particular variant is superior simply cos everyone else is playing it simply cos hearthpwn stumbled across it and determined that it was the chosen deck to get rampantly open to being copy pasted cos it was convenient to them? *and* people would kinda be forced to tech and hence refine the meta further?
wait, I guess that'd mean the meta would be decided more quickly, which would make it less interesting of a game to play for teching players because they would already have a crowdsourced test of every card they could have run and gotten the results for what works and what doesn't ahead of time, so any 'tech' would already be just a strictly worse idea than the 'meta' deck... um, never mind, thanks hearthpwn staff :P
Time to make some decks with "better" in the title
I could... if you ask nicely
Kappa
Please explain me, how a meta not got changed, when one of the best deck, if not the best deck (Even Pala) of a meta got "killed" by a nerf!
Had we Quest-Priest in the old meta for example? Was Even Shaman a viable ladder deck before the nerf? No! And this are only two signs that the meta changed.
So put your "Kappa" back in your a....
LUL
yeah...spell hunter is new, even and shudderwock shaman are new, tempo mage is new, odd paladin is new, quest priest is new, odd rogue is new, quest warrior is new
yeah, you're right
"new" meta
Kappa
Glad to have the decks prefaced with the descriptor "Good" so I know they're not bad.
Or maybe they're trying to trick you, like Greenland and Iceland.
Probably should have used "Fluffy"
I like the points you've made. I think I'll craft it.