First thought is that i like the expansiosn. I prefer playing control dekcs myself and i see a lot of cards for control decks for most classes.
That being said, i think Hound Hunter probably stays the strongest deck after the expansion, but Control Warrior becomming the(?) counter deck as it is one of the few (only?) classes which can survive 32 damage in one turn (and myabe some future Control / Armor Druid deck?).
That being said, Control Warrior might end up on top as it can OTK itself.
Other then that i really excited to try some new decks / archdtypes such as Rainbow (Spellschool) Mage, Plague DK and any form of Shaman (other than Totems).
"edited 1 day ago" by the person who today says they actually help make diamond cards.
By pure coincidence, your linkedin says you joined blizzard 1 year and 2 months ago, and this comment and thread was made 1 year and less than 3 months ago.
I don't mean anything by this, I just think it's funny lol
Valid point. OP posted in that topic and his post didn’t ‘sound’ as a dev one. Again i apologize if i am wrong you not being a dev.
Let’s, for the sake of the topic title, say there aren’t enough interesting decks on HSReplay. Where do play your sub optimal (interesting) deck? Standard (ladder) which is full of optimal (meta) decks…
PS
I made some interesting decks (in my opinion), but they never make it to the front page. Also i wouldn’t play them in Standard (ladder). I don’t play for rank, but even bronze is full of (optimal) meta decks which are usually (a lot) better.
I'd rather have them remove this deck from the game. It's stupid. I tried beating it like 5 times as quest priest. Even when I got my ideal 2-3-4-5-6-7-8 curve, I still got roasted before I was able to play quest reward. It's uninteractive and there's not much you can do as non-warrior control deck.
Nowadays when I face warlock as priest, I just concede. It saves me time and nerves.
Is this because Curse Warlock is (too) good or the Priest Quest is (too) bad (slow)… In my opinion it is the latter. Priest should be 2-3 / 4-5 / 6-7 (especially when you compare it with how easy some other Quests are).
I would say its because they played wrong. I'm playing Quest priest and priest IMO is favoured. Lock draw out the deck really fast and its easy to keep 10 cards in hand as priest meaning no damage. The only variant that priest struggles with is the Jaraxx since you have to answer the board.
Good point (against Curse Warlock). Still think Priest Quest is too slow…
I'd rather have them remove this deck from the game. It's stupid. I tried beating it like 5 times as quest priest. Even when I got my ideal 2-3-4-5-6-7-8 curve, I still got roasted before I was able to play quest reward. It's uninteractive and there's not much you can do as non-warrior control deck.
Nowadays when I face warlock as priest, I just concede. It saves me time and nerves.
Is this because Curse Warlock is (too) good or the Priest Quest is (too) bad (slow)… In my opinion it is the latter. Priest should be 2-3 / 4-5 / 6-7 (especially when you compare it with how easy some other Quests are).
0
No, i just like Renethal decks. Also I like some of the other card which i couldn't fit in the deck otherwise ^^.
1
First thought is that i like the expansiosn. I prefer playing control dekcs myself and i see a lot of cards for control decks for most classes.
That being said, i think Hound Hunter probably stays the strongest deck after the expansion, but Control Warrior becomming the(?) counter deck as it is one of the few (only?) classes which can survive 32 damage in one turn (and myabe some future Control / Armor Druid deck?).
That being said, Control Warrior might end up on top as it can OTK itself.
Other then that i really excited to try some new decks / archdtypes such as Rainbow (Spellschool) Mage, Plague DK and any form of Shaman (other than Totems).
-1
The discussion about the same decks aside.
Really well played by Bunnyhopper.
The guy deserved it in my opinion.
I wouldn't say braindead. How many of us would have won that Priest mirror against either Bunnyhopper or Deaddraw.
0
@FM7
Demolition Renovator.
0
Because i wanted to play with the new cards ^^.
0
Cool! Thanks for the compliment.
I feel this is the best Renathal build (okay, i am a bit biased :p ).
0
0
Overall i think the patch is great, but i dunno about Tidal Revenant though…
With the nerf they also could give him a small buff like taunt or 7 mana.
2
Valid point. OP posted in that topic and his post didn’t ‘sound’ as a dev one. Again i apologize if i am wrong you not being a dev.
Also
Does this sound dev like (* Throws money at you*).
Hard to take a dev who talks like this serious. Just my opinion.
1
Crazy idea; make them a lot cheaper (when you can buy them in the store). 25 $.. Like wut?!!
PS
Just like @Sherman1986 thinks i have my doubts OP being a dev.
I apologize if i am wrong you not being a dev.
0
Let’s, for the sake of the topic title, say there aren’t enough interesting decks on HSReplay. Where do play your sub optimal (interesting) deck? Standard (ladder) which is full of optimal (meta) decks…
PS
I made some interesting decks (in my opinion), but they never make it to the front page. Also i wouldn’t play them in Standard (ladder). I don’t play for rank, but even bronze is full of (optimal) meta decks which are usually (a lot) better.
0
Good point (against Curse Warlock). Still think Priest Quest is too slow…
0
Is this because Curse Warlock is (too) good or the Priest Quest is (too) bad (slow)… In my opinion it is the latter. Priest should be 2-3 / 4-5 / 6-7 (especially when you compare it with how easy some other Quests are).
0
Poly Bridge 2, War Pips, Rogue Tower and Max Payne 3. So mostly indie games. (except for Max Payne 3).
0
Why do you request? Whats is your goal?
Do you request if you lost too? ;)
I would add people too play friendly games with, with non meta lists.