I am sorry, but I really dont understand what you are getting at. not one bit.
Because of my garbage English ^^ I say current cards in whizbang decks are lack of new expansion synergy. Many people in comment section criticizing Whizbang the Wonderful card itself -_- It was perfect in Kobolds and Catacombs with weapon decks.
I am sorry, but I really dont understand what you are getting at. not one bit.
Because of my garbage English ^^ I say current cards in whizbang decks are lack of new expansion synergy. Many people in comment section criticizing Whizbang the Wonderful card itself -_- It was perfect in Kobolds and Catacombs with weapon decks.
Pfff.. is "bad deck" means low tier deck? I don't care it is strong or not. Whizbang decks are just to see synergies between cards on new expansions. It is not possible with only 1 or 2 RoS cards if they are not legendary.
If Whizbang isn't doing what you think it should, maybe your thinking is incorrect. Maybe the intended purpose of Whizbang has nothing to do with trying new cards.
The actual purpose of Whizbang is to allow players with small collections the opportunity to use the full recipe decks without making substitutions.
Whizbang decks have always been bad. I've never understood why anyone crafts it. I pulled a golden one and the only reason it's not a different Legendary by now is I figure it's a dead cert for the Hall of Fame one day.
You got the "hall of fame" wrong it's more of "hall of OP cards" rather than "this card was good so we HOF it"
Is it possible to change this thread's title as "whizbang decks are lack of new synergy" if there is a moderatior can do that? Cuz people dont read the content ^^
Use the edit function on the OP. Also, reading is hard. Didn't you get the memo from Ben Brode on the fact that HS players cannot read?
But Whizbang will always be available even in wild for its intended purpose: play with cards you won't or are unsure if you'll craft...or mess around with random archetypes; it's the closest thing we'll get to a random deck option.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If you thought you knew what you think I know, then you'd know I knew you knew I know.
Whizbang decks have always been bad. I've never understood why anyone crafts it. I pulled a golden one and the only reason it's not a different Legendary by now is I figure it's a dead cert for the Hall of Fame one day.
You got the "hall of fame" wrong it's more of "hall of OP cards" rather than "this card was good so we HOF it"
Whizbang will never be HOF'ed
You misunderstand me, I don't think it'll get Hall of Famed because it's good but because at rotation it will become useless. If I turn out to be wrong and Blizzard just let it fade into obscurity, so be it, but I don't really need the dust so I can wait.
in older recipes, Whizbang also did not have some synergies. They did not put all of the new cards as a recipe and they can't.
and also They need to sell some packs to make money you know, if they put all of the synergies in 1 card how can they sell packs ?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players. ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Reading the answers to the reasonable OP is depressing. The age / gray matter of the Hpwn users (and consecuentially of the HS players) is dramaticly low.
Reading the answers to the reasonable OP is depressing. The age / gray matter of the Hpwn users (and consecuentially of the HS players) is dramaticly low.
If you're going to insult the intelligence of a group of people, I'd run your comment through a spellchecker first.
What i would love to see as a change to Wizzbang is that they allow us to pick a deck. Cuz ya know they all suck more or less. I use wizzbang to play with frends most of the time.
There are some disappointing deck lists, but I think some of them look really cool. I particularly like the Big Shaman list that uses Muck Morpher to "cheat out" minions with powerful effects. It doesn't include a huge number of new cards, but the concept is interesting and new.
Also, to anyone saying that Whizbang is bad, pull your head out of your arse. It's designed to let new players have fun and work out which types of decks they enjoy playing. Not every card has to be designed for competitive play.
See "Cursed Crew" please. Its totally pirate warrior without RoS cards except Hench-Clan Burglar -_-
Sorry for bad English, I'm lazy and tired ^^ In a mage deck we can see both Khadgar and Kalecgos I think many other classes lack of new cards.
It is telling that both Boom and Togwaggle decks are missing, and I think the answer there will come in the form of the Zayle, Shadow Cloak card which we know will be a Whizbang-like card with 5 decks. My best guess is these will be decks themed around the 5 EVIL villains, so that is where the Boom and Togwaggle decks turn up. Becasue of this they probably made a conscious decision not to push those cards in the normal deck recipes.
The reason other villains appeared in deck recipes (namely Rafaam and Lazul) would simply be that they are not really build around cards in quite the same way, and they are therefore easier to slot into any old deck.
Coming to the decks that use very few new cards, e.g. the pirate rogue: keep in mind the two recipes for each class are usually split so one is based on the latest expansion, and the other is based on the previous expansion. So typically one of the decks doesn't use much that's new.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I am sorry, but I really dont understand what you are getting at. not one bit.
Rejoice, for even in death, you have become children of Thanos.
It's almost as if T5 wants players to pay for card packs instead of crafting one card to play in casual, causing them to lose out on potential profit.
Because of my garbage English ^^ I say current cards in whizbang decks are lack of new expansion synergy. Many people in comment section criticizing Whizbang the Wonderful card itself -_- It was perfect in Kobolds and Catacombs with weapon decks.
Whizbang is from Boomsday.
If Whizbang isn't doing what you think it should, maybe your thinking is incorrect. Maybe the intended purpose of Whizbang has nothing to do with trying new cards.
The actual purpose of Whizbang is to allow players with small collections the opportunity to use the full recipe decks without making substitutions.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
You got the "hall of fame" wrong it's more of "hall of OP cards" rather than "this card was good so we HOF it"
Whizbang will never be HOF'ed
Use the edit function on the OP. Also, reading is hard. Didn't you get the memo from Ben Brode on the fact that HS players cannot read?
Legend with : S65 Freeze Mage, S57 Maly Gonk Druid, S57 "Okay" Shaman, S53 Boom-zooka Hunter, S53 Maly Tog Druid, S52 Wild Tog Druid ft.Blingtron, S50 Quest Rogue, S49 Dead Man's Warrior, S41 Wild Clown Fiesta Druid, S41 Hadronox Jade Druid, S40 Wild OTK Dragon Druid, S35 SMOrc Shaman, S33 Jade Druid, S22 Control Priest, S19 Control Priest
But Whizbang will always be available even in wild for its intended purpose: play with cards you won't or are unsure if you'll craft...or mess around with random archetypes; it's the closest thing we'll get to a random deck option.
If you thought you knew what you think I know, then you'd know I knew you knew I know.
You misunderstand me, I don't think it'll get Hall of Famed because it's good but because at rotation it will become useless. If I turn out to be wrong and Blizzard just let it fade into obscurity, so be it, but I don't really need the dust so I can wait.
in older recipes, Whizbang also did not have some synergies. They did not put all of the new cards as a recipe and they can't.
and also They need to sell some packs to make money you know, if they put all of the synergies in 1 card how can they sell packs ?
Memedeck-seeker. Always tries to build new decks. Hates tournements, streamers, netdecks and poor-o players.
ah, but a tournement mode could be great !!!
Not many new cards in Whizbang recipes because even developers know that new cards suck.
Reading the answers to the reasonable OP is depressing. The age / gray matter of the Hpwn users (and consecuentially of the HS players) is dramaticly low.
If you're going to insult the intelligence of a group of people, I'd run your comment through a spellchecker first.
What i would love to see as a change to Wizzbang is that they allow us to pick a deck. Cuz ya know they all suck more or less. I use wizzbang to play with frends most of the time.
There are some disappointing deck lists, but I think some of them look really cool. I particularly like the Big Shaman list that uses Muck Morpher to "cheat out" minions with powerful effects. It doesn't include a huge number of new cards, but the concept is interesting and new.
Also, to anyone saying that Whizbang is bad, pull your head out of your arse. It's designed to let new players have fun and work out which types of decks they enjoy playing. Not every card has to be designed for competitive play.
how do I delete a comment ? XD
babijesus
It is telling that both Boom and Togwaggle decks are missing, and I think the answer there will come in the form of the Zayle, Shadow Cloak card which we know will be a Whizbang-like card with 5 decks. My best guess is these will be decks themed around the 5 EVIL villains, so that is where the Boom and Togwaggle decks turn up. Becasue of this they probably made a conscious decision not to push those cards in the normal deck recipes.
The reason other villains appeared in deck recipes (namely Rafaam and Lazul) would simply be that they are not really build around cards in quite the same way, and they are therefore easier to slot into any old deck.
Coming to the decks that use very few new cards, e.g. the pirate rogue: keep in mind the two recipes for each class are usually split so one is based on the latest expansion, and the other is based on the previous expansion. So typically one of the decks doesn't use much that's new.