Out of those 2, Bloodreaver Gul'dan for sure. He is used in every single warlock deck, so in worst case he gets nerfed (don't expect that to happen) and you can DE him for full dust.
The druid DK is only used in 2 decks, Jade and Big. As you struggle to choose between the 2 i doubt you'll have all the big legendaries needed for Big Druid, so that kinda leaves the Jade Druid which you don't seem to care about.
Maybe neither is a better answer as you don't seem to have several cards needed for the cubelock deck, but i'm sure there are decent Warlock decks you can create anyway.
Hey guys, i have been playing since 5 months, i have not dusted anything yet. but there are a couple of legendaries i got from packs which i have never ever used and i dont see any use for them anywhwere. Just wanted your opinion if i should dust them. would also like to mention that i do not play wild.
Baron Geddon is sometimes used and can be usefull in DK Mage decks.
Anomalus has seen some play in that same archetype, but that one definatly isn't seen often. All others are probably as safe a DE as you can get, especially since most of them will rotate out in a few months.
Hey guys, i have been playing since 5 months, i have not dusted anything yet. but there are a couple of legendaries i got from packs which i have never ever used and i dont see any use for them anywhwere. Just wanted your opinion if i should dust them. would also like to mention that i do not play wild.
If you are looking to DE a few of those to make a better card you know you will use.. I would start with Anomalous and Chogall. Those are both from Whispers of Old Gods and will be removed from Standard in April sometime. Neither are very good. Goya is a bit more interesting, but also is going to rotate out in April as well so can probably be DE'd if you dont already have a deck she "fits" in.
Lorewalker Cho... is kind of a weird one. It's of very little use right now (and probably safe to DE if you want something to play now) but since its Classic it COULD potentially see usefulness as we get new cards/sets.
Baron is classic and fits in several decks, I would keep him around personally.
Ozruk is OK'ish and will survive April's rotation. He is probably disposable though unless you have strong feelings/base cards for heavy elemental decks (as the poster above mentioned Shaman). Personally I would DE him if you are looking to make some newer/stronger legendary cards.
You have two extremities and much middle ground for decisions like this.....
1. Dont DE anything, you dont know where the game will be in the future, and options and collections are cool!
2. If you aren't using it in a deck now, and dont have any near immediate plans to use it.. DUST IT and make something you can play with now.
I walk the line closer to point 2... If you are pretty sure you wont be playing wild and havent touched the cards since you opened them, they are probably best dusted and put towards something useful.
Sure you could regret it down the road if Wild changes and new cards make the dusted cards "must haves"... but at that point you will probably have a few more legendaries sitting around to dust and re-craft the old ones ;)
Thank you so much for the replies. Also wanted to ask, is kingsbane worth crafting? the kingsbane mill rogue seems like a really fun deck.. i have all the cards for the deck except the kingsbane itself. But i don't wana craft anything that wont see use in the future. what do u guys think?
If mill rogue seems fun to you then it's definitely worth crafting yes. I think there is a place for it in decks besides mill as well (or at the very least, potentially will be). As for future use... that's impossible to say without knowing what Blizzard is up to. If you're looking for something that will be in Tier 1/2 decks ... then there are probably some better choices for you to craft.
I got it as my free legendary with launch, but if not I would have crafted it as I find mill rogue extremely fun to play vs the decks I have been seeing the last several weeks.
If mill rogue seems fun to you then it's definitely worth crafting yes. I think there is a place for it in decks besides mill as well (or at the very least, potentially will be). As for future use... that's impossible to say without knowing what Blizzard is up to. If you're looking for something that will be in Tier 1/2 decks ... then there are probably some better choices for you to craft.
I got it as my free legendary with launch, but if not I would have crafted it as I find mill rogue extremely fun to play vs the decks I have been seeing the last several weeks.
i am happy someone agrees. its really fun to spectate my friends. see them play the deck. thanks for the reply btw.
Are Putricide and elise star seeker safe disenchants as someone who plays wild.
Patricide technically gets better as more traps get added, since it means a trap Hunter deck becomes more viable with time. But since his stats are kind of bad, and the effect is hard to get value off of, I guess you can turn him into 400 dust. Elise is probably a yes too, since she is really good for value generation, but you can do that so easily with better cards in wild it is actually ridiculous.
Wrathion is definetly dust but i would wait on the rotface as it can be good in the future. For the other question , from personal experience i would reccomend the dragon priest deck which i climbed to rank 4 past season but secret mage deck is cheaper. They are both very good decks so whichever you feel you will enjoy more craft that deck first.
Are Putricide and elise star seeker safe disenchants as someone who plays wild.
I definatly wouldn't DE Elise yet. Currently i don't think she is used a lot, but it was one of the top cards not to long ago. Think its better to wait a bit to see if she returns to see more use.
That other guy hardly ever sees play, so i think its a safe dust.
Just wanted to check here before I dust... wrathion and rotface = good dust? Looks like it from the guide....
Neither see play and probably won't in the future. Being FTP those are probably good DE targets, even when Rotface has a long time to go before he rotates.
Fun fact: I looked up Wrathion recently, and he has had a positive winrate lately, probably because someone put him in some kind of dragon priest. His playrate is extremely low, though, so he did not get promoted.
Can you wait an expansion and see how he will do in April?
Tbh I want to say two things:
- Right now people play decks, whose win-condition is more in following a proactive strategy, rather than only playing defensively and outlasting your opponent. But once the rotation hits, many of the cards, which enabled such strategies, will be gone. Of course, they can be replaced by new ones, but I think, that if were to see old school control decks, in which out-valuing your opponent is a winnable game-play, then the archbishop should be a keep (for now).
- If you ask me, I'm not really positive about what I said. Currently he is being used in meme decks (I think), if I had him, I would insta-use him in thief priest decks.
tl; dr: Keep him for now. Back in Un'Goro I saw Guenther mage (a value, burn deck) and dragon-priest was also a mid-rangy value generating one. Since the meta will change for good in 3 months from now, I would just advice you not to rush, unless you are certain you don't want to play a) an attrition deck, b) priest, 3) you desperately need to craft something good atm.
Fun fact: I looked up Wrathion recently, and he has had a positive winrate lately, probably because someone put him in some kind of dragon priest. His playrate is extremely low, though, so he did not get promoted.
I think its still a decent card, 4/5 draw 1 and maybe more. Can imagine it being a decent card in a dragon deck which does seem to work well in priest right now.
I do have a soft spot for rotface its a shame warrior is so bad rn...
Well, there is still the option to keep him for another expansion or 2 and see what happens there. You decide whats more important, the 400 dust or the option to have him should things change.
Benedictus probably the same story. Never see him, but you never know what happens. Might be a nice tech card against Rin, but i'm not sure Rin sees much play anymore and usually by the time the 10/10 gets played the Warlock doesn't have many cards left to copy anymore either.
So just like Rotface, probably safe dust for a FTP. This coming from someone who dislikes dusting any legendary himself, i just can't ever do it even when its the worst legendary ever :D
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Out of those 2, Bloodreaver Gul'dan for sure.
He is used in every single warlock deck, so in worst case he gets nerfed (don't expect that to happen) and you can DE him for full dust.
The druid DK is only used in 2 decks, Jade and Big.
As you struggle to choose between the 2 i doubt you'll have all the big legendaries needed for Big Druid, so that kinda leaves the Jade Druid which you don't seem to care about.
Maybe neither is a better answer as you don't seem to have several cards needed for the cubelock deck, but i'm sure there are decent Warlock decks you can create anyway.
Hey guys, i have been playing since 5 months, i have not dusted anything yet. but there are a couple of legendaries i got from packs which i have never ever used and i dont see any use for them anywhwere. Just wanted your opinion if i should dust them. would also like to mention that i do not play wild.
madam goya, lorewalker cho, anomalous, chogall, ozruk, baron geddon.
what do u guys think?
All others are probably as safe a DE as you can get, especially since most of them will rotate out in a few months.
Thank you so much for the replies. Also wanted to ask, is kingsbane worth crafting? the kingsbane mill rogue seems like a really fun deck.. i have all the cards for the deck except the kingsbane itself. But i don't wana craft anything that wont see use in the future. what do u guys think?
If mill rogue seems fun to you then it's definitely worth crafting yes. I think there is a place for it in decks besides mill as well (or at the very least, potentially will be). As for future use... that's impossible to say without knowing what Blizzard is up to. If you're looking for something that will be in Tier 1/2 decks ... then there are probably some better choices for you to craft.
I got it as my free legendary with launch, but if not I would have crafted it as I find mill rogue extremely fun to play vs the decks I have been seeing the last several weeks.
Might look like fun, but stats show its a terrible winrate.
Wouldn't bother with it yet, especially when you are on a budget.
Creating that is probably a waste of dust.
Its in tier 4 for a reason.
Guess it depends on your idea of fun. If you cant have fun without winning then sure its not a good craft.
Are Putricide and elise star seeker safe disenchants as someone who plays wild.
Patricide technically gets better as more traps get added, since it means a trap Hunter deck becomes more viable with time. But since his stats are kind of bad, and the effect is hard to get value off of, I guess you can turn him into 400 dust. Elise is probably a yes too, since she is really good for value generation, but you can do that so easily with better cards in wild it is actually ridiculous.
Just wanted to check here before I dust... wrathion and rotface = good dust? Looks like it from the guide....
Also I'm f2p and about to craft my first decent deck with dust and gold cards etc which of these would i stand the best chance of hitting rank 5 with?
Or
Tysm
Currently i don't think she is used a lot, but it was one of the top cards not to long ago.
Think its better to wait a bit to see if she returns to see more use.
Being FTP those are probably good DE targets, even when Rotface has a long time to go before he rotates.
Fun fact: I looked up Wrathion recently, and he has had a positive winrate lately, probably because someone put him in some kind of dragon priest. His playrate is extremely low, though, so he did not get promoted.
Editor of the Heartpwn Legendary Crafting Guide:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/205920-legendary-tier-list-crafting-guide
Rotface is super fun playing w/ Scourgelord Garrosh. Definitely wouldn't disenchant.
What about archbishop benedictus? Safe to dust?
I do have a soft spot for rotface its a shame warrior is so bad rn...
Can imagine it being a decent card in a dragon deck which does seem to work well in priest right now.
You decide whats more important, the 400 dust or the option to have him should things change.
Never see him, but you never know what happens.
Might be a nice tech card against Rin, but i'm not sure Rin sees much play anymore and usually by the time the 10/10 gets played the Warlock doesn't have many cards left to copy anymore either.
This coming from someone who dislikes dusting any legendary himself, i just can't ever do it even when its the worst legendary ever :D