Hey, I hope you don't mind me sharing this little fun deck with you. I have always been a fan of control warlock and with the loss of N'Zoth I decided to take a different approach. Introducing the new Fatigue Warlock:
The deck is yet to be refined. When the meta settles down and when I have a more clear view of the other competitive decks, then I will make some proper changes. Inb4 there isn't much to say about this deck - it's like any control warlock you have played/seen in the K&C era. You have various anti-aggro tools, some heals (against baku hunter), an ooze against cubelock or weapon classes and value-generators against slower decks. You might be asking why I included Baba Yaga (Glinda) instead of Rin - well, I just wanted to go with the theme. Rin offers a taunt against faster decks and I would probably play Glinda right before the fatigue in order not to dilute my deck with more Glindas or Bankers, so ignore this page and go with Rin if you really want to be competitive.
Yeah, in my first deck I included the gnomeferatus, but they felt a bit ineffective especially with the loss of the oracles. I replaced them with the beetles.
Yeah, I also thought about including a second twisting and I think I will do just that the next time I log in. I was wondering between a nether and a siphon soul and I wanted to see how the siphon will work. I will also consider your advice, so thx for the feedback.
You monster. You want me to kill the penguins? This is a Baba Yaga deck, not a satanic one. :C
Amm, ne, I know that this is kinda a meme-ish deck, but I won't include the combo you mentioned. But in some kind of a zoo deck (with the hurt yourself cards) this combo will make a lot more sense there thematically.
I've been using this deck that I found on the site which is very similar to yours. I like it because I'm absolutely sick of Voidlord and find Voidwalker and Despicable Dreadlord to be fantastic against paladins. Besides, you often discover Voidlords with Stonehill. Also Lord Godfrey is absolutely insane.
Oh it's not my deck. Some other guy made it and I've used it probably 10 times. I haven't faced a taunt druid yet but there's so much clearing power in this deck that you could probably handle the pressure from it. They also don't run Malfurion (IIRC?) so you could likely just starve them out. I had no issues with Cubelock so taunt druid should be doable as well as long as you manage your Twisting Nether There were no quest rogues in the meta when I played it so I can't speak into that matchup but it would definitely be a tough one to say the least since this deck has a fairly passive playstyle.
I think the deck was constructed and used in the early days when Baku face, odd pally and cubelock were most of the meta so it was likely designed to counter those. Not sure how well it works with current meta.
Well, I personally played the deck on 4 different days and thus I faced different decks on my way to legend. On my second day (I believe it was the 17th April) 90% of the matches were against druid - either spiteful or taunt. And it's true that they don't run Malfurion anymore, but that's only because they don't want to resurrect other low-value beasts. I don't know how this change affects their win-rate against faster decks, but against slower ones this isn't an issue at all. We give them all of the time they need in order for them to play their own N'Zoth, the Corruptor (Hadronox) and gain lots of value out of it. The difference between Cube and Taunt is that the second one can exhaust us quite easily even though we may run a bagillion board clears in our decks. {And also that the first deck is aggressive in the early and mid-game, while the TD rules the late one} I see you already use him, but I'm thinking of adding a Spellbreaker of my own. If I find him on time, I'll at least reduce the mayhem from the Carnivorous Cubes a bit.
As for QR - fortunately for me I also didn't face them, but I'm 100% sure this will be a tough MU, when the deck becomes more popular. You said it yourself - we have a "fairly passive playstyle" so this would be a natural counter to us. Maybe this would be a reason for us to run Mountain Giants, but the rogue players can easily deny them with Glacial Shard and Vanish. :/
The reason why I brought up these decks in my previous post is because I feel how a nerf will hit us soon and it will affect Cubelocks and Spiteful decks but us as well. And since those decks are tier 1, taunt dudu and QR will have more room to breathe.
Interesting deck. +1 from me!! I wonder how this deck looks in wild. Probably with the oracles, deahtlords, dancing swords, king mukla, n'zoth package. etc. maybe dirty rat/doomsayer combo, not sure exactly.
I like how you built it. I think it's definitely more solid than mine. Just one question - how do you do against Quest Rogue and Taunt dudu?
I played quite a lot of that build as well. I haven't been doing great versus the taunt druids (except for a lucky Gnomeferatu that pulled Hadronox resulting in a turn 2 concede), tried to tech in Tinkmaster but I can't remember if it's actually been helpful enough. Once the local meta switched from a high percentage of paladins to taunt druids, taunt warriors and lots of spitefuls I've been experiencing with other decks. Gonna give it another shot and see how it works out versus the increasing amount of quest rogues. Probably not great thoigh...
In wild this will certainly be better, but there is another meta there ;)
Tbh I'm not a wild player, but I don't think that this deck can compete with the other more powerful interactions in wild (Big Priest, Mill Rogue, Naga Sea Witch interactions, OTK decks). It's definitely stronger there, but the competition is too.
Yeah, that's why I made a small comment in the "Stats and deck evaluation" part. Inb4 I wouldn't advise you to copy my deck 100%, as it doesn't feel refines yet. I don't have much time, as in an hour from now I have to go to work, but I'll definitely cut the ooze, the second siphon and maybe something else for a silence (and for something else too).
Could not dream of playing a deck like this without rin -_-
The times I've pulled Rin from Stonehill Defender it hasn't actually been that helpful. Most of the time (playing the version WhatAChamp linked to, without the Voidlords) I need to spend my mana to stall and stay alive as it's so passive. No times to play the seals until my opponents has run out of threats and then there's not much point. With that said I still can't resist the idea, picking in whenever I get the chance :)
Yeah, that's why I made a small comment in the "Stats and deck evaluation" part. Inb4 I wouldn't advise you to copy my deck 100%, as it doesn't feel refines yet. I don't have much time, as in an hour from now I have to go to work, but I'll definitely cut the ooze, the second siphon and maybe something else for a silence (and for something else too).
I actually just added a second Siphon that I had previously removed for whatever it was, but maybe it won't be useful. Already running one Spellbreaker.
Read the evaluation part you were referring to and it seems like a correct analysis. I should've played more right after the rotation when EVERYONE was running aggro paladin >_<
I have been playing this deck for the last hour now in standard (only replaced the banker for zola as I do not have it) and noticed that because you are running as many Posessed Lackies as demons it is a race which card you will draw first. If you end up with 1 voidlord in your hand before you have a Lacky: 1 Lacky becomes worthless. So I am testing it now with 1 less lacky and 1 less pact (applebaums work great in this deck too for healing) and added 2 despicable dreadlords. They are awesome and add value to your DK.
Hey, I hope you don't mind me sharing this little fun deck with you. I have always been a fan of control warlock and with the loss of N'Zoth I decided to take a different approach. Introducing the new Fatigue Warlock:
The deck is yet to be refined. When the meta settles down and when I have a more clear view of the other competitive decks, then I will make some proper changes. Inb4 there isn't much to say about this deck - it's like any control warlock you have played/seen in the K&C era. You have various anti-aggro tools, some heals (against baku hunter), an ooze against cubelock or weapon classes and value-generators against slower decks. You might be asking why I included Baba Yaga (Glinda) instead of Rin - well, I just wanted to go with the theme. Rin offers a taunt against faster decks and I would probably play Glinda right before the fatigue in order not to dilute my deck with more Glindas or Bankers, so ignore this page and go with Rin if you really want to be competitive.
Fatigue warlock without Gnomeferatu? Try again, dude.
If it’s win condition is fatigue, you should think about Gnomeferatu. She is incredibly powerful if Glinda sticks one turn.
Yeah, in my first deck I included the gnomeferatus, but they felt a bit ineffective especially with the loss of the oracles. I replaced them with the beetles.
Yeah, I also thought about including a second twisting and I think I will do just that the next time I log in. I was wondering between a nether and a siphon soul and I wanted to see how the siphon will work. I will also consider your advice, so thx for the feedback.
any way you could cram Snowflipper Penguin and Sanguine Reveler in there? i think it would make a cool combo with crowskin.
You monster. You want me to kill the penguins? This is a Baba Yaga deck, not a satanic one. :C
Amm, ne, I know that this is kinda a meme-ish deck, but I won't include the combo you mentioned. But in some kind of a zoo deck (with the hurt yourself cards) this combo will make a lot more sense there thematically.
Spamming in the thread once again. Well, I had some success and I want to thank all of the users who gave their feedback regarding my deck.
I have written a very detailed deck description and I posted some stats.
Tl;dr - the deck is fun and strong, but not a net-deck material. I expect to see more bad MUs coming after the patch changes.
Thx for your time.
I've been using this deck that I found on the site which is very similar to yours. I like it because I'm absolutely sick of Voidlord and find Voidwalker and Despicable Dreadlord to be fantastic against paladins. Besides, you often discover Voidlords with Stonehill. Also Lord Godfrey is absolutely insane.
Oh it's not my deck. Some other guy made it and I've used it probably 10 times. I haven't faced a taunt druid yet but there's so much clearing power in this deck that you could probably handle the pressure from it. They also don't run Malfurion (IIRC?) so you could likely just starve them out. I had no issues with Cubelock so taunt druid should be doable as well as long as you manage your Twisting Nether There were no quest rogues in the meta when I played it so I can't speak into that matchup but it would definitely be a tough one to say the least since this deck has a fairly passive playstyle.
I think the deck was constructed and used in the early days when Baku face, odd pally and cubelock were most of the meta so it was likely designed to counter those. Not sure how well it works with current meta.
Well, I personally played the deck on 4 different days and thus I faced different decks on my way to legend. On my second day (I believe it was the 17th April) 90% of the matches were against druid - either spiteful or taunt. And it's true that they don't run Malfurion anymore, but that's only because they don't want to resurrect other low-value beasts. I don't know how this change affects their win-rate against faster decks, but against slower ones this isn't an issue at all. We give them all of the time they need in order for them to play their own N'Zoth, the Corruptor (Hadronox) and gain lots of value out of it. The difference between Cube and Taunt is that the second one can exhaust us quite easily even though we may run a bagillion board clears in our decks. {And also that the first deck is aggressive in the early and mid-game, while the TD rules the late one} I see you already use him, but I'm thinking of adding a Spellbreaker of my own. If I find him on time, I'll at least reduce the mayhem from the Carnivorous Cubes a bit.
As for QR - fortunately for me I also didn't face them, but I'm 100% sure this will be a tough MU, when the deck becomes more popular. You said it yourself - we have a "fairly passive playstyle" so this would be a natural counter to us. Maybe this would be a reason for us to run Mountain Giants, but the rogue players can easily deny them with Glacial Shard and Vanish. :/
The reason why I brought up these decks in my previous post is because I feel how a nerf will hit us soon and it will affect Cubelocks and Spiteful decks but us as well. And since those decks are tier 1, taunt dudu and QR will have more room to breathe.
Interesting deck. +1 from me!! I wonder how this deck looks in wild. Probably with the oracles, deahtlords, dancing swords, king mukla, n'zoth package. etc. maybe dirty rat/doomsayer combo, not sure exactly.
In wild this will certainly be better, but there is another meta there ;)
Tbh I'm not a wild player, but I don't think that this deck can compete with the other more powerful interactions in wild (Big Priest, Mill Rogue, Naga Sea Witch interactions, OTK decks). It's definitely stronger there, but the competition is too.
Not sure if this is a troll thread or not.
Yeah, that's why I made a small comment in the "Stats and deck evaluation" part. Inb4 I wouldn't advise you to copy my deck 100%, as it doesn't feel refines yet. I don't have much time, as in an hour from now I have to go to work, but I'll definitely cut the ooze, the second siphon and maybe something else for a silence (and for something else too).
I have been playing this deck for the last hour now in standard (only replaced the banker for zola as I do not have it) and noticed that because you are running as many Posessed Lackies as demons it is a race which card you will draw first. If you end up with 1 voidlord in your hand before you have a Lacky: 1 Lacky becomes worthless. So I am testing it now with 1 less lacky and 1 less pact (applebaums work great in this deck too for healing) and added 2 despicable dreadlords. They are awesome and add value to your DK.