⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Imagine a play mode where your class is determined by RNG every game ^^
5 pages in a salt post. Hearthpwn never changes.
Author, you're so negative to other players, it's unbelievable how can you even have fun in the game.
Hall of Fame (ignore list): aleathas, Baylith, cendol, DiamondDM13, Dominieq, doomr, glitterprincess, hamtarofr, Heck, Jwigg33, Kaladin, Krewger, Legend_Entomber, libertyprime, Maukiepaukie, PandarenHero, randjob, s2mikey, SchruteBucks, The_Giratina, TheWamts, ticandtac, tictactucroc, tsudecimo, WaffleMonstr
I also waited. Just wasted my time
Not true. I only play fun decks, and I have a positive win rate with plenty of win streaks. And I find losing fun, too. Because I find playing the game fun, regardless of the outcome of each match.
Everyone wants to generalize from their own experiences, and that's a terrible way to generalize. You can't even use the sentiments of people on the forums to buttress your position, because the most vocal posters are a self-selected group of the saltiest players in the game.
I took a small break for about a month. Started playing again, got some enjoyment back. Playing control warrior ATM.
"I play to win, I play Pirate warrior and Shaman".
Blizzard should have nerfed Tunnel Trogg long ago, waiting for stuff to cycle (2 FUCKING YEARS!!!) is unacceptable. Small time buccanner needs nerfing now blizzard, you hear us? Now!
Play this deck I made just for when you feel the way you feel
@PAH; I think you're right though in that the reward structure needs to change, at least somehow, to try and discourage something like the situation we have with Pirate Warrior or Aggro Shaman. I don't even think there's anything wrong with those lists necessarily (STB could use adjusting but that's my only beef); but right now the difference in efficiency with those lists compared to anything else makes it seem almost counterproductive to pick anything else. So in the long term to fix that they need to resolve the issue they acknowledged in the Q&A, and make ladder less grindy; this is what I'd wager a big portion of what we see with representation on ladder, and if they implement a way to at least allow people to not feel punished for picking a slower list then we'd see something more balanced. Like if Pirate Warrior or Aggro Shaman isn't 30-40% of the ladder, where does Midrange Hunter fall? They'd still lose horribly to the hyper-aggro lists, but if the meta isn't overwhelmingly unfavored for them do they get a chance to succeed?
Personally I'm a big fan of the idea of thresholds at 15/10/5, with the monthly reset placing players at higher tiers. I know they talked about win streaks past 5, but I'll be honest... I'm not sure I think that's needed, and could cause a spike in bots since they won't need higher than a 50% winrate anymore. This still doesn't fix high legend (there was a video of Amnesiac talking about it on Reddit, basically it's a similar issue; fast/efficient is basically mandatory currently for Top 100 climbs), but it's a start.
I don't think there's any issue with people playing the same class for the entirety of their HS "career"; I imagine that's rare, but people should play what they find enjoyable and there's nothing wrong with that. It's better to encourage people to play the other classes, like they do with quests, but if someone really does enjoy Pirate Warrior more than any other deck and wants to play only Pirate Warrior I'm not concerned by that.
Articles I suggest every player reads to improve at the game;
MTG/Hearthstone biases to avoid
Reframing negative Hearthstone experiences to improve at the game
Who's the Beatdown?
I think a lot of it has to do with the fact there isn't a lot of diversity. People say there is but there really isn't.
1. Shaman. Doesn't matter if it's aggro, control or midrange they share 50% of the same cards.
2. Priest. It's either Dragon or Reno.
3. Mage. Only Reno.
4. Warlock. Only Reno
5. Paladin. Only murlocs.
6. Warrior. Aggro, sometimes dragon rarely control.
Haha funny guy. No it's just called playing non-meta decks and getting to 5 and above every month. It's a new thing called skill, you should try it ;)
I remember playing priest at release:
Reasons for losing:
Not drawing Auchenai or Circle of Healing versus zoolock or facehunter.
Not drawing Mind Control versus Control Warrior.
Not drawing both Shadow Word: Death and BGH versus Handlock
...
There's so few cards that actually COUNTER other cards.
Where's the early game cards that negate the damage from pirates..?
What 1 or even 2 mana card negates the potential 9 damage from Spirit Claws?
What 1 or 2 mana card replaces the 3 minion board advantage from Spirit Claws?
Where's the 2/3 for 1 that cannot attack heroes, and restores 3 health to your hero at the end of turn?
That's the only thing that actually negates a 3/2 for 1 completely, without being horrible situational.
I mean. Take a serious look on Drain Life.
And let that card sink in for a couple of seconds.
3 mana.
2 damage, one time. Heal for 2. It doesn't even negate one single 1 cost minion, for 3 mana.
Hall of Fame (ignore list): aleathas, Baylith, cendol, DiamondDM13, Dominieq, doomr, glitterprincess, hamtarofr, Heck, Jwigg33, Kaladin, Krewger, Legend_Entomber, libertyprime, Maukiepaukie, PandarenHero, randjob, s2mikey, SchruteBucks, The_Giratina, TheWamts, ticandtac, tictactucroc, tsudecimo, WaffleMonstr
in Wild.
For me the most "unfun" thing is knowing already from start what deck to expect. In Standard if you see a Rogue is only THAT Rogue deck; Shaman same with little variation.... Warlock? I bet its a Reno, ditto Mage. Hunter and Pally MIA.
In Wild? EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED FROM ALL CLASSES.