A deck which can't be described by just a few sentences. That why I recommend you reading the description of it. Here is a excerpt from the text:
Look at the deck list, think about it for a while ..... although stop - I know what you think:
"This sure looks like the next BIG meta-defining deck - exactly like the BEAST Hunter Blizz told us about SECRET PALADIN. All those unique combos and synergies packed into only 30 cards! It's sooooo unfortunate we will just witness like 10 cards per game, because of how fast this deck wins games - for your opponent. This deck is really reliable - it has a strong early-game, followed by an astonishing mid-to-late game. It really gets it's job done in a game where the heroes have 100 health.
Great job, OP (not refering the deck this time surprisingly).
not just 100% but 100+% I especially like the ability to transform your hero not just once but twice. The opponent will clearly have to concede in confusion.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
not just 100% but 100+% I especially like the ability to transform your hero not just once but twice. The opponent will clearly have to concede in confusion.
You *end* the game with Lord Jaraxxus once and then once again with Majordomo (in the same match obviously), hence the 100+%.
It's all fun and jokes until we start talking about Nat Pagle. That's why we need to also look a bit on playability and strength of the cards. Millhouse and Cho *can* be good at times, also their combo is neat. Nat Pagle on the other hand doesn't do anything to end the game significantly faster like Millhouse.
You did forget that you will draw pagle when you already drew all the other 29 cards. So in case of fatigue duel, you will definitely win it.
And you forgot that games usually don't last any longer than 9-10 turns with this deck, so when you want to include some late-game card like Nat Pagle, then I recommend you taking something that will decide the game sooner or later like Wisp or Deathwing - although I would clearly go with Wisp.
@Aneng
You can use Nozdormu as it makes your matches more efficient as they end faster. It's all about value and Nozdormu provides some - kinda.
A deck which can't be described by just a few sentences. That why I recommend you reading the description of it. Here is a excerpt from the text:
Look at the deck list, think about it for a while ..... although stop - I know what you think:
"This sure looks like the next BIG meta-defining deck - exactly like the BEAST
Hunter Blizz told us aboutSECRET PALADIN. All those unique combos and synergies packed into only 30 cards! It's sooooo unfortunate we will just witness like 10 cards per game, because of how fast this deck wins games - for your opponent.This deck is really reliable - it has a strong early-game, followed by an astonishing mid-to-late game. It really gets it's job done
in a game where the heroes have 100 health.Great job, OP (not refering the deck this time surprisingly).
Flag."
Is this good enough to report as "Trolling"?
I like the usage of mIllhouse and cho. But you need some more nat pagle in it :|
Just remember the good times!
not just 100% but 100+% I especially like the ability to transform your hero not just once but twice. The opponent will clearly have to concede in confusion.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
It's all fun and jokes until we start talking about Nat Pagle. That's why we need to also look a bit on playability and strength of the cards. Millhouse and Cho *can* be good at times, also their combo is neat. Nat Pagle on the other hand doesn't do anything to end the game significantly faster like Millhouse.
You did forget that you will draw pagle when you already drew all the other 29 cards. So in case of fatigue duel, you will definitely win it.
Just remember the good times!
I don't have Lorewalker Cho, can I use Nozdormu instead?
Famous last words, Mind if i roll Weed? Weed Hoarder, Azeroth
My decks: please, take a look if you want- a lot of dust-free decks-feedback more than welcome
http://www.hearthpwn.com/members/akasumi/decks?sort=-viewcount
Blizzard's news portal in Greeks wastedmurlocgang.gr
Can someone of you tell me how you fared with the deck?