• 0

    posted a message on been playing hunter for 4 months, wouldn't recommend

    Are you talking about standard?  Standard is garbage for hunter.  Try Reno hunter or Egg hunter in Wild.  So fun to stick it to some star-aligner druid putz.

    Posted in: Hunter
  • 0

    posted a message on Which Packs should i buy?

    Keep that gold for the next round of gotta-haves.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 2

    posted a message on Developer Insights: Days of the Frozen Throne with the Live Content Team

    You won't be seeing me in the tavern for this insipid mess.  Not even going to bother with the pack on my accounts, let alone the quests.  Just wonder how long it will pollute - one slot reserved for 40 games of PvE and now one for this failure of a brawl.  Perhaps they should add a daily quest slot if they intend to populate the existing ones with garbage.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on classic only generic deck players

    That's one of the decks for sure.   The will emote back occasionally if you spam enough, like 5 or 6 times a turn.  They will also concede, but not simply because you have lethal.  I usually face them with 'stock' hunter (spellstones, cats, and DK) and I confirm that they are a bot by just manhandling them for several turns despite having lethal (like I sometimes do on PvE Gauntlet in Eternal to see how negative I can get them or how positive I can get my own HP)

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on classic only generic deck players

    They are bots.  My theory is that they are just farming enough dust to craft Whizbang and then they sell the account.  I think accounts still get a free name change credit so then it just gets changed to your name.  I have noticed a substantial reduction in performance of my F2P decks due to a significant increase in the number of players running Whizbang from 25-20.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on turn times
    Quote from Billie_Lurk >>

    ...drivel...

     Don't you have some vaporware to shill?  Oh, you are. My bad.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on turn times

    It sure is easy to spitball bad ideas (see this week's brawl for an example).  People, of course, realize that doubling the number of modes doubles the matchmaking time, right?  The 'match me with the same options' would multiply this by a huge amount (better nuke a hot pocket while waiting for a 4x).  If they are going to add a new mode that it time-based, it should be chess clock - you explode after X minutes of cumulative turn time.  Of course, that would just be an aggro fiesta, fun times, right?  Go back to the drawing board with your armchair developer suggestion.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Developer Insights: Days of the Frozen Throne with the Live Content Team

    Sure, it was a great concept.  Some actual testing of that concept would have easily demonstrated what a mess it would be.  Same as where I work - no ownership, no one accountable for the final project.   As much as a knob that BB is, he would never have greenlighted this clown fiesta.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Duel of the Death Knights - Tavern Brawl #171

    An easy 1/1/1.  Sadly, there are actually worse brawls.  Did they even consider reducing the cost of the cards by 1 to offset the hero power?  Did they consider doing something to compensate Thrall and Valeera for not getting the 'battlecry' from their DK?  Did anyone at Team 5 even playtest this thing besides the intern who coded it?

    Posted in: Tavern Brawl
  • -1

    posted a message on Days of the Frozen Throne Has Begun - Earn 600 Gold, Free Happy Ghoul, Death Knight Tavern Brawl

    This brawl does a great job of showcasing how the death knights are piss poor design and nothing but a shameless gotta-have money grab.

    Posted in: News
  • -3

    posted a message on New Classic Cards Coming to Hearthstone, Tournaments On Hold, Halloween, New Welcome Bundle, New Paladin Hero

    25 more levels of Whizbang vs. Whizbang. (or losing every match as F2P if that's your cup of tea)  Obviously worth pushing off tournament mode to do.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Petition to bring Dirty Rat to classic set

    Agree - with the people saying no.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Classic Cards Coming to Hearthstone, Tournaments On Hold, Halloween, New Welcome Bundle, New Paladin Hero

    You clearly don't play 25-20.  Everyone just dusts whatever they can to get Whizbang.  That's why all the bots lately, especially in Asia.  F2P decks just get stomped by Whizbang.  It's the price of entry now.  So kindly explain how this will be better if you have to slog through 25 more ranks?

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on New Classic Cards Coming to Hearthstone, Tournaments On Hold, Halloween, New Welcome Bundle, New Paladin Hero

    The 50 rank thing will fail, it will actually make things worse.  Anyone who is playing at 25-20 knows why.  They really screwed the pooch this time, just boring as hell to play low ranks now.

    Posted in: News
  • 0

    posted a message on Thoughts on Sir Annoy-O?

    Whatever, you will all buy it.  You need dust to hit the ground running for the next expansion, so WW vs. TBP doesn't matter.  It would be cool if they introduced 'wild' packs as part of the promo.  I think a wild pack should have more commons (like 8 cards total) than the traditional packs though.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.