Again? "Midrange" hunter hunter was already a smorc deck, and hearthstone care about the people with no skill. You cant really do anything to change it so you better accept it
Whaaa Whaaaa, he beated me with an aggro deck so he has to be less skillful than me, I'm the master here, yet got beated by one of the easiest to disrupt archetypes. WHAAA WHAAA Q__Q
Ermm do you have any other problem beside being childish? Read my comment to the end i didnt write it because i lost them (i use it too sometimes), and i wrote it doesnt need much skill because there are literally no (as in this case nor in many aggro decks) sinergy (except kill command and houndmaster or the secret one) you just have to play your minions on curve and mostly push for face since 80% of your minions has bigger attack than health and your enemy will do the trade anyways. If you have a little brain (i dont really know yet if you cant see further than flaming others) you will understand my statement and agree with it since you dont you will prove that you are really just an angry kid who reliefs his stress on a site based around a game. Have a nice day
Ermm do you have any other problem beside being childish? Read my comment to the end i didnt write it because i lost them (i use it too sometimes), and i wrote it doesnt need much skill because there are literally no (as in this case nor in many aggro decks) sinergy (except kill command and houndmaster or the secret one) you just have to play your minions on curve and mostly push for face since 80% of your minions has bigger attack than health and your enemy will do the trade anyways. If you have a little brain (i dont really know yet if you cant see further than flaming others) you will understand my statement and agree with it since you dont you will prove that you are really just an angry kid who reliefs his stress on a site based around a game. Have a nice day
1) I wanted to test your mettle and try to make you angry and see how much of your post was a full rant. 2) I play all the archetypes (doesn't mean I'm a master of either though) So I can relate to both sides of the situation. 3) that's the whole point of aggro, doesn't mean it doesn't require good calculation of what to put when to prevent board clear, prevent being outvalued, prevent you die during your opponent's turn. etc, so it requires thought as much as control, just in a lot less turns. 4) I don't agree with you, aggro is not as simple as you and all others want to make it sound, just is more effective at short games because THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF PLAY AGGRO. 5) For the record, I'm pretty much an adult, but never lost my inner child, reason why I play card games with kiddy styles like HS.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
There is nothing left if you can not has the right to bear your arms - werebear 2016-eternity campaign
I wouldn't call hunter cancer. I wouldn't call anything cancer in this game, really. Midrange is good against control but its weak against aggro, which is all the meta is right now (midrange hunter itself is borderline an aggro deck)
Speaking as a control player that tried midrange hunter to quickly rank up to 5 before the end of the month, yeah, it's stupidly strong. It's really stopped being annoying and is now just funny, the difference in power between control decks and face decks.
Blizzard needs to pull their finger out and actually do some work on their game if they expect any control style to be viable. It's pathetic in its current state, comparative to face decks.
Even with abysmal rng I was dealing upwards of 80 face damage in a game. No amount of healing, armouring up and board clearing can possibly keep up. And the more it dominates the more people will turn to playing it...
Speaking as a control player that tried midrange hunter to quickly rank up to 5 before the end of the month, yeah, it's stupidly strong. It's really stopped being annoying and is now just funny, the difference in power between control decks and face decks.
Blizzard needs to pull their finger out and actually do some work on their game if they expect any control style to be viable. It's pathetic in its current state, comparative to face decks.
Even with abysmal rng I was dealing upwards of 80 face damage in a game. No amount of healing, armouring up and board clearing can possibly keep up. And the more it dominates the more people will turn to playing it...
Midrange hunter is one of the few counters to control warrior, so don't expect an easy matchup. They're going to try and close out the game as quickly as possible against control.
Also when I play control warrior I have absolutely zero problems with aggro. Control shits all over aggro. Only tough matchup for CW in my opinion is Mid Hunter. And that's a good thing.
Ok ...a really big question, if your minions have aggressive stat lines e.g. 4/2 and 4/3 and 6/5 why on earth would you fucking trade, you are the aggressor, it's not you that should trade ...smh dumbass OP.
And then a smartass will come out and shout: "B..but it's not fun and interactive" , and how I despise this fucking HS slogan, well aren't I forcing you to interact with my board? and believe me I'm having a blast while coining a CoW followed by another CoW in a warriors face! All the interaction and fun in the world!
People constantly whine about warrior. Hunter is great against warrior, hence it moves up the ladder. Other midrange decks are simply too slow or weak to accomplish the same.
More like you just play barnes on turn 4 and win the game since almost all pulls from a midrange hunter deck are incredible. Grandmother can be annoying but it's not that threatening until hunter decks start putting in dire wolf to allow it to trade up. Most midrange hunters don't use abusive in favor of bats and squires as 1 drops.
Grandmother is so threatening because of houndmaster.
Speaking as a control player that tried midrange hunter to quickly rank up to 5 before the end of the month, yeah, it's stupidly strong. It's really stopped being annoying and is now just funny, the difference in power between control decks and face decks.
Blizzard needs to pull their finger out and actually do some work on their game if they expect any control style to be viable. It's pathetic in its current state, comparative to face decks.
Even with abysmal rng I was dealing upwards of 80 face damage in a game. No amount of healing, armouring up and board clearing can possibly keep up. And the more it dominates the more people will turn to playing it...
Midrange hunter is one of the few counters to control warrior, so don't expect an easy matchup. They're going to try and close out the game as quickly as possible against control.
Also when I play control warrior I have absolutely zero problems with aggro. Control shits all over aggro. Only tough matchup for CW in my opinion is Mid Hunter. And that's a good thing.
I didn't mention Control Warrior.
I am a Paladin/Priest/Renolock Control player usually, and the Control Warriors that I faced using Midrange Hunter were a piece of cake. None of what you said had any bearing on what I was saying, so I'm not sure what you were trying to convey? o.O
Well to be honest hunter gets the board control and then pushes to face. But it is true that there is a more cancerous deck version with abusives and argent squires whitch I really don't understand at all. I even don't understand this secret keeper hunter. It just doesn't make any sense to play this in this meta...Some people really just pick up decks from hearthpwn and try pushing for legend rank in order to show something. Really don't understand anything of that. I guess I just lost faith in humanity :|
10 guilds = 10
5 friendly 3 colors = 5
5 enemy 3 colors = 5
5 nephilim colors = 5
mono-colorless = 1
Prism (all 5) = 1
And then start adding colorless as a color :P
EDIT: lol, okey okey 10 less combinations, man I'm sleepy at my work haha. yeah 32 :P
There is nothing left if you can not has the right to bear your arms - werebear 2016-eternity campaign
If a midrange hunter only goes face, they aren't a very good midrange hunter player.
Moved to Hunter forum
2) I play all the archetypes (doesn't mean I'm a master of either though) So I can relate to both sides of the situation.
3) that's the whole point of aggro, doesn't mean it doesn't require good calculation of what to put when to prevent board clear, prevent being outvalued, prevent you die during your opponent's turn. etc, so it requires thought as much as control, just in a lot less turns.
4) I don't agree with you, aggro is not as simple as you and all others want to make it sound, just is more effective at short games because THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF PLAY AGGRO.
5) For the record, I'm pretty much an adult, but never lost my inner child, reason why I play card games with kiddy styles like HS.
There is nothing left if you can not has the right to bear your arms - werebear 2016-eternity campaign
I wouldn't call hunter cancer. I wouldn't call anything cancer in this game, really. Midrange is good against control but its weak against aggro, which is all the meta is right now (midrange hunter itself is borderline an aggro deck)
Speaking as a control player that tried midrange hunter to quickly rank up to 5 before the end of the month, yeah, it's stupidly strong. It's really stopped being annoying and is now just funny, the difference in power between control decks and face decks.
Blizzard needs to pull their finger out and actually do some work on their game if they expect any control style to be viable. It's pathetic in its current state, comparative to face decks.
Even with abysmal rng I was dealing upwards of 80 face damage in a game. No amount of healing, armouring up and board clearing can possibly keep up. And the more it dominates the more people will turn to playing it...
CoW Hunter is midrange aggro.
Ok ...a really big question, if your minions have aggressive stat lines e.g. 4/2 and 4/3 and 6/5 why on earth would you fucking trade, you are the aggressor, it's not you that should trade ...smh dumbass OP.
And then a smartass will come out and shout: "B..but it's not fun and interactive" , and how I despise this fucking HS slogan, well aren't I forcing you to interact with my board? and believe me I'm having a blast while coining a CoW followed by another CoW in a warriors face! All the interaction and fun in the world!
The 1st step towards a better game is firing Mike Donais! We had enough of his "skillful" balances!
#FireMikeDonais
People constantly whine about warrior. Hunter is great against warrior, hence it moves up the ladder.
Other midrange decks are simply too slow or weak to accomplish the same.
it's good to see hunter doing its thing going face is its true nature.
無敵のゲルマン魂#2276
I am a Paladin/Priest/Renolock Control player usually, and the Control Warriors that I faced using Midrange Hunter were a piece of cake. None of what you said had any bearing on what I was saying, so I'm not sure what you were trying to convey? o.O
I find that Aggro Shaman can still out-aggro this deck-type.
Certain Control decks also seem to be able to alleviate any pressure that Hunters can dish out.
So it's not cancer quite yet.
Well to be honest hunter gets the board control and then pushes to face. But it is true that there is a more cancerous deck version with abusives and argent squires whitch I really don't understand at all. I even don't understand this secret keeper hunter. It just doesn't make any sense to play this in this meta...Some people really just pick up decks from hearthpwn and try pushing for legend rank in order to show something. Really don't understand anything of that. I guess I just lost faith in humanity :|
Just remember the good times!
Hmm I had assumed that control warrior was the most popular control deck. I rarely, if ever, face any of the decks you mentioned on ladder.
Well, can't beat them join them I say more salt to be had in this thread, why not stoke the fire while we are at it
ill crush every priest with the "cancerous" deck ( I hate priest) ain't so weak as people believe it