You deserve that each time you play this crap deck
let me discover more cabalists tome from the cabalists tomes discovered. And let me put more then 5 ice blocks per match assuin.i wanna laugh at your lame face when you try to kill me with hero power. Did i already say that i am roping every priest i find untill the last 2 seconds of turn?enjoy your stupid spells.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Best quotes: "Casual is perfectly fine" "warlock is not overpowered" "Playing odd paladin just to test it"
Trying to play control with paladin, warrior and mage and only match vs cursed Highlander Priest, 5 games in a row, ragequit in 5° game and change the deck for Exodia mage, what I encounter? A fucking hunter, don't see a single fucking hunter all day, only when try to counter priests with Exodia Mage.
Trying to play control with paladin, warrior and mage and only match vs cursed Highlander Priest, 5 games in a row, ragequit in 5° game and change the deck for Exodia mage, what I encounter? A fucking hunter, don't see a single fucking hunter all day, only when try to counter priests with Exodia Mage.
Currently laddering with razakus priest and hating myself for taking such an easy path to rank 5.
How is this deck considered skill intensive is beyond me. Even if you don't get your raza and dk on curve, you still have a fuckload of tools to keep the board clear. And Curious Glimmerroot is just Drakonid OP without the dragon condition: every single opponent netdecks, even a goat would guess what op-ass card has started in his deck.
if the game decides that you have to lose you will lose no matter what. If you take a counter to a class that you found 2 or 3 times you will find then the counter of your current class. If you have a perfect hand opponent will have better draws over time. You put eater of secrets,you find hunters. You put murloc crab eater, you will find jades. You put geist and you will find murlocs. Lets put some volcanic potion for evolve shamans and you will find controls. No worries,its just rng.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Best quotes: "Casual is perfectly fine" "warlock is not overpowered" "Playing odd paladin just to test it"
And look! It's a zoolock - with a random marin. Of course. Because that makes SO MUCH SENSE. Can't I play against someone who has some modicum of deckbuilding sense? This is on the level of making a singleton midrange hunter and jamming in bloody Reno Jackson. It's absurd, and will not pay off as often as it fails.
I find the fact that aggro and tempo (which are just really aggro) decks can slot in greedy control cards (another example that springs to mind is how Keleseth Rogue just casually fits in Cairne Bloodhoof) a fucking insult and a slap in the face of control players.
And how about an evolve shaman putting Primordial Drakes? Just foundone right now, and to add salt to the wound, I lost to that, because shaman already used both Maelstrom Portals, and so I did'nt play around a card that is absolutely anti-synergistic with the eck and should not be played in any sort of agro deck ever.
Hearthstone as it is now is by far the worst Blizzard game I have ever played, even though it wasn't always. Let me compare it to Diablo 3 (because I have the most and recent experience with that besides HS; I goof off in HotS occasionally and really should play more SC2 because it's awesome, but Overwatch isn't for me and I stopped WoW and that's fine, you can't play everything, even though lingering WoW nostalgia got me into HS).
Diablo 3 received a lot of flak when it launched, and maybe rightfully so, but the devs made it better and continue to do so still—and they don't expect us to preorder anything every four months. They made the game so much better than when it launched, and most if not all of the community complaints have been solved.
because they FUCKING CARE.
Hearthstone is nothing but a lazy cash cow aimed at dumb mobile players. It's the same cancerous shit as Clash of Clans and Candy Crush Saga by now. The developers do not give a fuck and put zero effort in at this point.
Maybe some people care. Art design seems to be done by people who care. I think Ben Brode cares. He seems pretty sincere in his love for the game. But still, he and some other devs mostly spend their time "interacting with the community" dodging that there are any problems with the game, only to "fix" (and I'm using that term very loosely here) those problems MONTHS too late.
They don't bother with restructuring the game so that it can be a more enjoyable experience. They don't really care about balance as long as they can spew their winrate statistics bullshit. All they seem to care about is putting Ben Brode in the spotlight to build hype for a new expansion, so that we idiots—whales and little fish alike—will stupidly sink our money into pre-ordering like the sheeple we are.
I really wanted Hearthstone to be the game I thought it could be, and I think the only way would have been, as Blizzard does best, fine tuning and patching it better and better, one step at a time, that's ok, but at least getting BETTER. Hearthstone is the only Blizzard game I can think of that hasn't gotten better over its lifespan—it has gotten worse.
Maybe—MAYBE the new dungeon run mode is what the game desperately needs. A way to have fun with Hearthstone. I'm willing to bet the new card set doesn't change anything. People will figure out a rock-paper-scissors of dominant strategies within weeks and the grind of dumb decks will continue as ever.
But without me. I'll be playing Diablo 3 instead.
Are you expecting changes to be implemented on a weekly basis? Metas are meant to settle and stick around for a little while (ie more than 4 weeks) before things are changed. Otherwise, you can't count on anything about the game being consistent for any reliable length of time.
And winrate statistics is the only objective measure by which to determine the power of a deck. Comments from community members/players often are full of subjective flaws and/or bias that skews what they would define as 'appropriate balance'. This was seen with the Raging Worgen Warrior nerf, a deck that was nowhere near Tier 1 or Tier 2 (in fact it was barely seen on ladder at all) getting nerfed because the community voted (ie complained) that it wasn't appropriately balanced. Thus, the TTK was killed, despite it being a comparatively inconsistent deck when put alongside the actual meta decks of the time.
If you used things other than winrate statistics all you would get is players voting out entire decks and archtypes/playstyles out of the game to leave what they only want to play and play against. In other words, they would most certainly kill OTK/TTKs, aggro decks, mill decks, and some midrange decks instantly. That isn't a healthy way to let the game be lead.
And look! It's a zoolock - with a random marin. Of course. Because that makes SO MUCH SENSE. Can't I play against someone who has some modicum of deckbuilding sense? This is on the level of making a singleton midrange hunter and jamming in bloody Reno Jackson. It's absurd, and will not pay off as often as it fails.
I find the fact that aggro and tempo (which are just really aggro) decks can slot in greedy control cards (another example that springs to mind is how Keleseth Rogue just casually fits in Cairne Bloodhoof) a fucking insult and a slap in the face of control players.
So, you're offended that players in a game happen to realize that they have to tech their decks a little to have a better win rate when playing against certain control match-ups? Okay.
I was playing Zoolock on ladder (my own version of it, not the most popular version) I thought it would be fun. It was not. At all. Mainly because half of the time I play against fucking Hunters and they always fucking ALWAYS have perfect curve, if I sometimes not draw patches but I can pull it out they have 1-2 crawler(s) 10/10. But then I realised that it is not even that bad. Because in the next match my opponent UI my cobalt scalebane on T6, haha really mother fucking funny. I guess I will have to play cancer Priest, because if your deck does not do broken stuff then you cant win anymore in HS.
Oh and btw 15 out of 17 matches I didnt even see Keleseth in one I Drew him on T8 and 1 time I played him on Curve! Wow how fducking lucky I am.
Hey look, a hunter. Mmm.... I wonder if it will be control.. or maybe some kind of otk deck.. might be a gimmick deck aswell...
Oh no nevermind, it's fucking hunter so the only question is will it learn more towards midrange or aggro.
Fuck cubelock
just got absolutely destroyed by a basic deck in casual
because he drew the nuts for 15 turns in a row and i drew terribly.
fucking hate my life
first game of the day btw
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
what did i do to deserve this
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Double the trouble
FUCKING SHIT CANCER CUNT GAME
And let me put more then 5 ice blocks per match assuin.i wanna laugh at your lame face when you try to kill me with hero power.
Did i already say that i am roping every priest i find untill the last 2 seconds of turn?enjoy your stupid spells.
Best quotes:
"Casual is perfectly fine"
"warlock is not overpowered"
"Playing odd paladin just to test it"
Trying to play control with paladin, warrior and mage and only match vs cursed Highlander Priest, 5 games in a row, ragequit in 5° game and change the deck for Exodia mage, what I encounter? A fucking hunter, don't see a single fucking hunter all day, only when try to counter priests with Exodia Mage.
Ragequit again, fuck this game!!!
FUCK
THIS
GAME
5
FUCKING
STRAIGHT
LOSSES
IN
LADDER
Currently laddering with razakus priest and hating myself for taking such an easy path to rank 5.
How is this deck considered skill intensive is beyond me. Even if you don't get your raza and dk on curve, you still have a fuckload of tools to keep the board clear. And Curious Glimmerroot is just Drakonid OP without the dragon condition: every single opponent netdecks, even a goat would guess what op-ass card has started in his deck.
Like...dog sh!t.
Tavern Brawl. 7 Mages in a row. Really?
Nothing random about this, game is rigged af.
Is it me or is arena just really bad right now? Made a priest midrange deck and went 0-3. Wtf
Great art can never be created without great suffering.
if the game decides that you have to lose you will lose no matter what.
If you take a counter to a class that you found 2 or 3 times you will find then the counter of your current class.
If you have a perfect hand opponent will have better draws over time.
You put eater of secrets,you find hunters.
You put murloc crab eater, you will find jades.
You put geist and you will find murlocs.
Lets put some volcanic potion for evolve shamans and you will find controls.
No worries,its just rng.
Best quotes:
"Casual is perfectly fine"
"warlock is not overpowered"
"Playing odd paladin just to test it"
Click to see my Hearthstone projects:
I was playing Zoolock on ladder (my own version of it, not the most popular version) I thought it would be fun. It was not. At all. Mainly because half of the time I play against fucking Hunters and they always fucking ALWAYS have perfect curve, if I sometimes not draw patches but I can pull it out they have 1-2 crawler(s) 10/10. But then I realised that it is not even that bad. Because in the next match my opponent UI my cobalt scalebane on T6, haha really mother fucking funny. I guess I will have to play cancer Priest, because if your deck does not do broken stuff then you cant win anymore in HS.
Oh and btw 15 out of 17 matches I didnt even see Keleseth in one I Drew him on T8 and 1 time I played him on Curve! Wow how fducking lucky I am.
Blizzard's new social tab's making it easier to report these profanity. Shall we?