• 0

    posted a message on Cards that no one cared about and now are meta
    Quote from Jaybaseball1 >>

    In the beginning, Deathstalker Rexxar was bad... We didn't see it coming lol

     And for a very good reason, when he was released we don't have tons and tons of rush/poison/lifesteal beasts.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on What cards will you miss the most in April??

    Vilespine, feels like the only really decent rogue class card in ages... :(

    The DK's was a good idea but the team failed miserably in balance them, some are beyond broken level and others are weak or insanely overcosted.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Proposed updates to Baku and Genn
    Quote from Ashaman79 >>
    Quote from Aegis24 >>

    While this idea isn't outlandish or unfair like most nerf cries, it's simply not needed.  The idea behind Odd and Even decks is a self imposed restriction on card use for a benefit.  If you add another mulligan restriction you're just unnecessarily hurting the archtypes.  When playing against these decks opponents get the advantage of knowing what cards can and can't be played and you can adjust your play accordingly.  

    Now, something I would like to see is a nerf to the discovery/RNG mechanics utilized within these decks.  If your deck can only be even/odd then your discovery/RNG cards should only discover/create even/odd cards accordingly.  No more Tarims in Odd Paladin and no more healing rains in Even Shaman for example.  This keeps with them theme of the deck without letting them bypass the restrictions that make up for the effect they're benefiting from

    i complete agree with your first sentences. However, looking at the winrates, the advantage clearly outweighs the self imposed restriction for even shaman and odd rogue.

    we can keep asking for nerfs for particular odd/even decks like you ask above, like the level-up nerf, etcetera, but the problem is that if baku or genn is not updated this problem remains...

     What exactly the problem some classes be better in even/odd than others? 

    Priest and warrior have better dragon decks than others.

    Warlock, priest and mage have better singleton decks than others.

    Druid and hunter have better beast decks than others.

    And the list can going...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Proposed updates to Baku and Genn

    Genn maybe be playable because is not terrible 6/5 for 6 manas but Baku just kill the card unless the cost reduced to 7.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on What classes do you only play??

    Top: Rogue, mage and warrior.

    Eventual: Shaman, priest and warlock.

    Only play when have quest: Paladin, hunter and druid.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Should Malygos be HOF'ed?

    You get full dust refund and keep the card for Wild, for me every classic card should be HoFed just for the free dust.

    Posted in: Standard Format
  • 0

    posted a message on Does Animal Companion need nerf?

    I don't think need nerf but in what f...... world you guys think is 1/3 chance to get the 4/2 charge? No way!!!

    I play this game before Nax release and after see this card a milion times I can say for sure, is 60% 4/2 charge, 20% taunt and 20% the 2/4.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on New Shaman Legendary - Zentimo

    This card is insane in jade shaman, kill 3 opponent minions and summon 3 jades.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is Odd Warrior bad??

    It is the most polarized deck in current meta.

    You destroy any aggressive deck and is destroyed for everything else.

    Hunters will be a good match but the DK alone make your entire deck a pile of useless garbage.

    Warrior maybe was a good option if Blizzard don't refuse to do the necessary massively overnerf in hunter cards. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on On Barnes and Big Decks .

    Barnes need to be nerfed, all the other cards in the deck is ok.

    5 manas Barnes can be enough.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Mass Hysteria vs Psychic Scream

    Posted in: Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on I think the Druid nerfs were bad

    The Increase of only 1 mana in 2 cards is the line between broken tier 1 decks and completely useless garbage.

    Let forgive Blizzard in this one, balance druid is just impossible.

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is Wild in a better state than Standard just now?

    In Wild you have many classes in comparison with Standard.

    Impressive 3 classes: Shaman, priest and rogue.

    Standard only have one: Hunter.

    Ok, I exagerating a little but is not far from the thuth.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Thoughts on the Upcoming Hall Of Fame Roation?
    Quote from Deck_Fiend >>
    Quote from Jakorindo >>
    Quote from Deck_Fiend >>
    Quote from 1xbenx1 >>
    Quote from Deck_Fiend >>

    prep can't go to hall of fame, the entirety of rogues spells would have to be readjusted. Every card printed has to take proper into consideration, so getting rid of it would mean all rogue spells need to be reduced in price. I seriously doubt they'd want that on their hands. 

    also decks with prep are never the "cancer" decks that dominate ladders. I really don't see why this would be HoF'd. 

    If you took prep from rogue you;d kill a lot of it's identity. 

     Are you kidding? Quest Rogue's consistent viability is almost entirely dependent on Prep. Also, which other Rogue cards would need to be rebalanced? Sap and Eviscerate are fine. Sprint is actually the correct mana cost for draw 4 (or at least it was until UI and the Nourish nerf). I guess Blade Flurry is probably wrong at that point...maybe. Vanish is fine at 6, being a worse Psychic Scream.

    Seriously, what cards in Basic/Classic would need to change?

     all the spells cost too much without prep. everything would need rebalanced. not to mention the next few expacs will be terrible as those spells will all be designed with prep in mind. 

    rogues spells are made with prep in mind, if you remove prep without a rebalance you kill off like 90% of the fun rogue builds. 

    I've never played quest rogue and I was on a break before the nerf. I don't think it's good now. 

    I actually think removing prep would be healthy, but rogue would suffer for it for at least a year till they started making new cards that were not built around perp. 

     All the spells cost too much? Name 5? Cause Sap, Evescirate, Vanish, Myra's unstable element, Sprint are all fine. Fan of knives is good, backstab, Cold blood, walk the plank is fine, shadowstep, cannon barrage. There could be arguments made for the spells that no one use (such as wanted!), but honestly. The reason rogues get such bad spells overall is the presence of preparation

     I actually agree with you. I think prep is factored into every aspect of rogue, so removing it would be detrimental to the current state of rogue and would effect it for at least a year I would say.

    But yes, in the long run it would be better, as we wouldn't have to base everything around 1 card.

    Quote from 1xbenx1 >>
    Quote from Deck_Fiend >>

     all the spells cost too much without prep. everything would need rebalanced. not to mention the next few expacs will be terrible as those spells will all be designed with prep in mind. 

    rogues spells are made with prep in mind, if you remove prep without a rebalance you kill off like 90% of the fun rogue builds. 

    I've never played quest rogue and I was on a break before the nerf. I don't think it's good now. 

    I actually think removing prep would be healthy, but rogue would suffer for it for at least a year till they started making new cards that were not built around perp. 

     A bunch of bad expac cards may be affected by it, but like I said, none of the basic/classic cards are (with the slight exception of maybe Blade Flurry).


    PS: no one is playing sprint in a deck without prep.

     HoF prep and they can change Sprint for the right 6 manas cost.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Should I dust priest?

    If was to judge the actual meta we should dust everything except hunter.

    The nerfs or the rotation can't come soon enough.

    I am cursed, can't play vs anything else than hunter, the matching system only put me vs this cursed class and every f...... game the opponent play the full upgraded spellstone in turn 5, never fails, not once, 20 or more games in a row...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.