You can't harass members who play Face Hunter, nor are they compelled to make preemptive apologies or justifications for playing it. They don't hack or crack their opponents' game, they simply play existing cards that form a specific deck. If you suck at countering Face Hunter, you should blame the designers, not the community.
Yeah exactly my view point, and that usually cuts in in these decks. Unless the spell is really really powerful, a minon along its effect is often just better. Just like Humility and Aldor Peacekeeper, one sees play, the other not so much for the same effect. So perhaps this card will see play, on the other hand we're talking about hunter, they have their way set in stone it seems and it's always a bad idea to change what already works really good.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
There's no such thing as arrogance it's called jealousy and that's a YOU problem, not a ME problem.
Argent Protector is better than this card, because it costs less, has better stats, and is less situational, and how much play does Argent Protector see? Very little in some aggro Paladin decks, so i don't expect this card to see use in constructed as it's very situational.
Don't think this will ever see play. The benefit is too situational and isn't worth the crummy 4/2 stats even when you do get it off. Even in arena I would steer clear of this card most of the time.
Really this should've been a 4/3 and even then I'd question its viability. I mean, compare this to Kirin Tor Mage or even Scarlet Purifier, two class cards that barely see play and both have a more beneficial effect than this. Whoever designed this card really over-valued the buff.