Unfortunately, I've been editing this deck for a while, and earlier copies had few flaws that caused 51% winrate in a total of this deck, as you can see in the first picture below - it's v1.6, 6 times edited a deck. I'm using 2 PC's, to make it clear. This deck has improved a 51% winrate to 57% winrate in just a few games on the first PC, and that can also be seen in the first picture below(games history). I've managed to rise from rank 18 to rank 10(current) in less than 14 days, and I played about 1/1.5 hours a day(2nd PC). The 2nd picture is just an updated stats on the current HDT I'm tracking.
A wooping 27 games huh? I guess if I play any deck once and win I have a 100% win rate.
Keep in mind that I am not saying that this is a good deck but when it comes to playtesting, 30 games is what you would be aiming for in terms of a testing phase to showcase a deck's viability. Of course we don't know the ranks but 27 is by far and in excess of a single game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Experienced Deckbuilder, Legend Player, Wild Expert, TCG Veteran and Contributing Author toWildHS & Vicious Syndicate. Any and all support is greatly appreciated as it helps me make further quality content. 🐺 ➣Twitter ➣Decks ➣Patreon
A wooping 27 games huh? I guess if I play any deck once and win I have a 100% win rate.
dude man, 27 is alot of games for some people. Please dont belittle others, he has played 27 games and has done well and wanted to share with the community. Also a deck gets worse or better by the day with an evolving meta, and depending on rank. I get annoyed when people try to ruin posts like this... state feedback on the deck and dont belittle someone bc they havent devoted their life to playing enough games to statistically prove to some people whether its truly good or just luck
A wooping 27 games huh? I guess if I play any deck once and win I have a 100% win rate.
Keep in mind that I am not saying that this is a good deck but when it comes to playtesting, 30 games is what you would be aiming for in terms of a testing phase to showcase a deck's viability. Of course we don't know the ranks but 27 is by far and in excess of a single game.
Fair enough. Personally I try to get at least 100 games, post rank 5, before I call something a success.
Apologies to berroni for my harsh tone, I just dislike when people claim way exaggerated win rates.
A wooping 27 games huh? I guess if I play any deck once and win I have a 100% win rate.
Keep in mind that I am not saying that this is a good deck but when it comes to playtesting, 30 games is what you would be aiming for in terms of a testing phase to showcase a deck's viability. Of course we don't know the ranks but 27 is by far and in excess of a single game.
Fair enough. Personally I try to get at least 100 games, post rank 5, before I call something a success.
Apologies to berroni for my harsh tone, I just dislike when people claim way exaggerated win rates.
A deck shouldnt have to be post rank 5 to be posted by someone who wants feedback and to share his success. 27 games is a big time investment for some players 100 games post rank 5 basically is a HUGE time investment... Its not an exaggerated win rate, this is his rate at whatever rank, it justay not be what you want to see for you to try the deck but others can give constructive feedback and or try his deck out.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
If you have not, check it and if possible leave a comment, I would appreciate it.
70% Winrate WILD Mage
Link Updated
No
Where is the proof of success with this deck? 70% winrate is a nice number but I don't believe it since it is:
1) BSM Mage. A deck that was Tier 3 worthy at best in Standard already.
2) Reactive deck. The only current good reactive deck in the format is Odd Warrior.
Moving into https://outof.cards/members/firepaladinhs/decks
Excuse me on my late answer, I had some troubles IRL.
https://imgur.com/a/Iye4iKy
A wooping 27 games huh? I guess if I play any deck once and win I have a 100% win rate.
Unfortunately, I've been editing this deck for a while, and earlier copies had few flaws that caused 51% winrate in a total of this deck, as you can see in the first picture below - it's v1.6, 6 times edited a deck. I'm using 2 PC's, to make it clear. This deck has improved a 51% winrate to 57% winrate in just a few games on the first PC, and that can also be seen in the first picture below(games history). I've managed to rise from rank 18 to rank 10(current) in less than 14 days, and I played about 1/1.5 hours a day(2nd PC). The 2nd picture is just an updated stats on the current HDT I'm tracking.
https://imgur.com/a/RUBGmys
https://imgur.com/a/LObYolE
Keep in mind that I am not saying that this is a good deck but when it comes to playtesting, 30 games is what you would be aiming for in terms of a testing phase to showcase a deck's viability. Of course we don't know the ranks but 27 is by far and in excess of a single game.
dude man, 27 is alot of games for some people. Please dont belittle others, he has played 27 games and has done well and wanted to share with the community. Also a deck gets worse or better by the day with an evolving meta, and depending on rank. I get annoyed when people try to ruin posts like this... state feedback on the deck and dont belittle someone bc they havent devoted their life to playing enough games to statistically prove to some people whether its truly good or just luck
Fair enough. Personally I try to get at least 100 games, post rank 5, before I call something a success.
Apologies to berroni for my harsh tone, I just dislike when people claim way exaggerated win rates.
A deck shouldnt have to be post rank 5 to be posted by someone who wants feedback and to share his success. 27 games is a big time investment for some players 100 games post rank 5 basically is a HUGE time investment... Its not an exaggerated win rate, this is his rate at whatever rank, it justay not be what you want to see for you to try the deck but others can give constructive feedback and or try his deck out.