(Sorry for any mistake, I used google translator to write this text.)
In life nothing remains without change even if it is a small change, for me the problem of hearthstone is precisely that things are not dynamic, the meta never goes through drastic changes and continue the same boring decks that preclude different decks and different strategies. In my opinion should have at least every month an update with changes in the cards, DO NOT HAVE FEAR BLIZZARD.
Warlock and Mage are my favorite classes, but I can not stand to see cubelocks anymore. I have some ideas that will make the goal more free, I would like to hear from you. These changes would enable a lot of new things for Zoolock, Midrange Warlock, Control Warlock and Even Warlock. I would like your opinion to try to make this game better.
Another change I'd like to see was in spiteful summoner.
Well, I'm for these changes, but some are definitely suboptimal. You went for the theme of demons only costing (4) or less, but that makes possessed lackey and skull straight up bad. I'd rather have them being bad than as good as they are now, but I think those changes could have been better.
Spiteful summoner is a good change, but again I think that it could be a bit better because still, let's say a spiteful druid plays this on curve (and is even potentially one many ahead of the curve) and he gets tyrantus (which is all too common). He still gets 16/18 worth of stats for 7 mana. It's a change I'd like to see, but I feel like it could be better.
I must admit that I don't really get the buff to voidlord (it is a buff, right?). I feel like that is not a card that needs to be changed. The powerlevel is fine for 9 mana and it's a great defensive tool. The skull and lackey are the problem, because they allow you to cheat it out early.
Edit: excuse me, I didn't read the 2 mana tag on skull and lackey. This would make them potentially great demonzoo cards, but I still don't really see it.
Thanks for sharing your ideas, I wanted to say that there are good demons cost 4 or less, such as 5/6 which is the best possibility and also could be added in the future. The change in Voidlord was so that he did not get weak, because after the change in weapon and Possessed the Voidlord would be a little too expensive and this would harm the Control, it cost 8 manas also helps to be included in the Even Warlock. Regarding spiteful summoner was just an idea, I think that would decrease the Druid's winrate.
Here is how I would nerf those three cards by the way. I'm not the best nerfer myself (I feel like this would make lackey/skull pretty shitty) but I feel that any nerf is a good nerf.
Warlock DK is OP but it is not good to modify it, currently it is a card that supports all the decks of Warlock, if they modify it for worse the class will lose a lot of strength and will hardly reach Tier 2.
Maybe discover a minion and summon it. Anyway it s the best nerf i ve ever seen
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"The flow of time is always cruel... its speed seems different for each person, but no one can change it... A thing that does not change with time is a memory of younger days..."
Good ideas but the change in spiteful summoner would leave the card very weak, since it is dependent on RNG and the changes in the cards of the Warlock would change the mechanics of the card and not modify the power, I think that the blizzard would not change the mechanics of a card. I Think any idea is good if it's for nerf cubelock hahah
Warlock is the class I play the most and I like it that's why I'm suggesting it, and the hearthstone problem is just that, it's not dynamic, if there were updates every month at the very least even if they made mistakes and had to revert afterwards , it does not matter, the important thing is that the goal change and game evolves, and do not stay the same decks and strategies for 4 months and even after 4 months with the arrival of new cards most of the meta also does not change.
i do agree that some things need to change, and i feel like blizzard is doing well with their changes, having every 2 months a nerf or expansion. but i feel like the problem is that blizzard is always to timid with their changes, and that they are to attached to their schedule. you can do 1 change every 2 months, but when something like mysterious challengercomes along, then you could just jump in and change it. and if know it is boring and nobody plays it, then go ahead and buff it, and then if it is to good, then nerf it!
blizzard does not buff cards because then they limit design space, and could become to powerful combined with other cards, but if they were not so afraid to make changes off the usual change schedule. but they really could make changes every hour if they wanted to, because it is a digital game. if they buff cards, then they can just nerf other cards, it does not have to a nerf every 4 months, and if they had more consistent nerfs than they could be more daring with their cards, and more bold with changes, and they could add buffs too, so many good things could happen, this game could shape up so well, if they would only make changes when they are needed! not consult each other about it for months, and months, only to decide their are more important things. and then nerf it when it is to late.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Rejoice, for even in death, you have become children of Thanos.
Spiteful summoner should be - reveal random spell from your deck and summon a minion with a cost equal OR LESS than its cost. That's how its handled in some other tcg games. But ofc hearthstone developers always have to go step ahead and ruin everything.
Ofc with that changed summon effect it should be at least 5/5 in stats.
Skull? Just make it summon daemon with MAX 4 attack. I know its still going to summon voidlord but at least then, silence would have been more efficient - no doomguard.
I already played a lot of Warlock and I can tell you: Hearthstone does not need the current Cubelock.
CUBElock... Cube... Then change cube and thats it... No need for other warlock cards...mybe ONLY lackey but dont think it would be great if cube get changed...
(Sorry for any mistake, I used google translator to write this text.)
In life nothing remains without change even if it is a small change, for me the problem of hearthstone is precisely that things are not dynamic, the meta never goes through drastic changes and continue the same boring decks that preclude different decks and different strategies. In my opinion should have at least every month an update with changes in the cards, DO NOT HAVE FEAR BLIZZARD.
Warlock and Mage are my favorite classes, but I can not stand to see cubelocks anymore. I have some ideas that will make the goal more free, I would like to hear from you. These changes would enable a lot of new things for Zoolock, Midrange Warlock, Control Warlock and Even Warlock. I would like your opinion to try to make this game better.
Another change I'd like to see was in spiteful summoner.
I tried
Well, I'm for these changes, but some are definitely suboptimal. You went for the theme of demons only costing (4) or less, but that makes possessed lackey and skull straight up bad. I'd rather have them being bad than as good as they are now, but I think those changes could have been better.
Spiteful summoner is a good change, but again I think that it could be a bit better because still, let's say a spiteful druid plays this on curve (and is even potentially one many ahead of the curve) and he gets tyrantus (which is all too common). He still gets 16/18 worth of stats for 7 mana. It's a change I'd like to see, but I feel like it could be better.
I must admit that I don't really get the buff to voidlord (it is a buff, right?). I feel like that is not a card that needs to be changed. The powerlevel is fine for 9 mana and it's a great defensive tool. The skull and lackey are the problem, because they allow you to cheat it out early.
Edit: excuse me, I didn't read the 2 mana tag on skull and lackey. This would make them potentially great demonzoo cards, but I still don't really see it.
Fuck cubelock
Thanks for sharing your ideas, I wanted to say that there are good demons cost 4 or less, such as 5/6 which is the best possibility and also could be added in the future. The change in Voidlord was so that he did not get weak, because after the change in weapon and Possessed the Voidlord would be a little too expensive and this would harm the Control, it cost 8 manas also helps to be included in the Even Warlock. Regarding spiteful summoner was just an idea, I think that would decrease the Druid's winrate.
Here is how I would nerf those three cards by the way. I'm not the best nerfer myself (I feel like this would make lackey/skull pretty shitty) but I feel that any nerf is a good nerf.
Fuck cubelock
Warlock DK is OP but it is not good to modify it, currently it is a card that supports all the decks of Warlock, if they modify it for worse the class will lose a lot of strength and will hardly reach Tier 2.
Discover a "random" minion and summon it??
Maybe discover a minion and summon it. Anyway it s the best nerf i ve ever seen
"The flow of time is always cruel... its speed seems different for each person, but no one can change it... A thing that does not change with time is a memory of younger days..."
Good ideas but the change in spiteful summoner would leave the card very weak, since it is dependent on RNG and the changes in the cards of the Warlock would change the mechanics of the card and not modify the power, I think that the blizzard would not change the mechanics of a card. I Think any idea is good if it's for nerf cubelock hahah
Another possibility
So you would merf only warlock cards hahahaa you know that blizzard nerf 1 card per class max???? But only if they need to...
Warlock is the class I play the most and I like it that's why I'm suggesting it, and the hearthstone problem is just that, it's not dynamic, if there were updates every month at the very least even if they made mistakes and had to revert afterwards , it does not matter, the important thing is that the goal change and game evolves, and do not stay the same decks and strategies for 4 months and even after 4 months with the arrival of new cards most of the meta also does not change.
Some changes need to be made.
I already played a lot of Warlock and I can tell you: Hearthstone does not need the current Cubelock.
i do agree that some things need to change, and i feel like blizzard is doing well with their changes, having every 2 months a nerf or expansion. but i feel like the problem is that blizzard is always to timid with their changes, and that they are to attached to their schedule. you can do 1 change every 2 months, but when something like mysterious challenger comes along, then you could just jump in and change it. and if know it is boring and nobody plays it, then go ahead and buff it, and then if it is to good, then nerf it!
blizzard does not buff cards because then they limit design space, and could become to powerful combined with other cards, but if they were not so afraid to make changes off the usual change schedule. but they really could make changes every hour if they wanted to, because it is a digital game. if they buff cards, then they can just nerf other cards, it does not have to a nerf every 4 months, and if they had more consistent nerfs than they could be more daring with their cards, and more bold with changes, and they could add buffs too, so many good things could happen, this game could shape up so well, if they would only make changes when they are needed! not consult each other about it for months, and months, only to decide their are more important things. and then nerf it when it is to late.
Rejoice, for even in death, you have become children of Thanos.
Spiteful summoner should be - reveal random spell from your deck and summon a minion with a cost equal OR LESS than its cost. That's how its handled in some other tcg games. But ofc hearthstone developers always have to go step ahead and ruin everything.
Ofc with that changed summon effect it should be at least 5/5 in stats.
Skull? Just make it summon daemon with MAX 4 attack. I know its still going to summon voidlord but at least then, silence would have been more efficient - no doomguard.
I completely agree with you, Hearthstone needs to be more dynamic and not afraid to risk and make constant changes like League for example.
4 attack or less? good
If cube were the problem, all the decks with it would be strong
if lackey gets nerfed then I think skull + void daddy are fine how they are