Why people hate to play wild? You can find diffrent cards and decks in there. Standard meta is playing over and over the same decks and cards. I just finished vs. and result is: secret hunter, odd mage, secret hunter, odd mage, odd mage, zoo warlock, another zoo, odd mage. I doubt that new expansion change something and after 1 month We will face the same archetypes over and over again.....
- En_Joshi_Godrez
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years, 4 months, and 12 days
Last active Sat, Apr, 6 2019 03:55:58 -
- 8
- 21
- 73
- 0 Followers
- 167 Total Posts
- 413 Thanks
-
4
Patchessthepirate posted a message on Standard meta is soooo boringPosted in: General Discussion -
23
TrevoRaven8 posted a message on New card - Rafaam's Scheme/facepalm
-
6
Dr_Scaphandre posted a message on Rise of Shadows - Eight Revealed Cards, Expansion InformationPosted in: NewsAnd then of course there's the Mega Bundle, which again, has a hero portrait (something we used to get for free) locked to it, and it's a big portrait too of the Fortuneteller from Old Gods.
But hey, do you guys not have credit cards?!
-
14
RaptorWithWings posted a message on Duskfallen AvianaHey Hearthstone Plays, I went ahead and made the thumbnail for your future "Hearthstone - Best of Duskfallen Aviana" video for you
-
26
Mashuu posted a message on Do people hate Wild?? Why??Posted in: Wild FormatWild is still more fun, than Standard. Soo
-
22
Dunscot posted a message on Upcoming Hearthstone Rule Changes - Copy Cards, Transform, Shadowboxer Nerf & MorePosted in: NewsIt may sound silly, but in case of Shifter Zerus and Molten Blade and Shifting Scroll, a refund would be warranted. Ghostly Charger, I agree, is not really that relevant, but the others are to some extend, I'd say. Ghostly Charger should belong to an "Undead" type, that I have been kind of waiting for since Naxxramas, but different story... maybe someday.
While it's not exactly part of any utilized strategy, giving these cards buffs while they are in hand or in the deck adds to their strength, and gives their unpredictable flexibility a clear upside. Shifter Zerus can be improved with effects such as Smuggler's Run or Prince Keleseth, and from there is a random minion +1/+1 or higher. This makes it easier for the card to turn into something a player may find useful in a given situation. Instead of waiting for a minion with a good or even fitting effect, you may also wait for a minion with a helpful statline, and these effects contribute to that.
Same with Molten Blade: Effects from Hobart Grapplehammer or Grimestreet Pawnbroker make it easier for the transformation to suit your needs, and add to the potential of the card itself.
What matters for Shifting Scroll is especially the option to discover it from Primordial Glyph. When other options are less inteteresting, the Scroll can be any random spell with a 2 mana discount. With this change, picking the scroll is almost always the worst choice since you are giving up on the discount that Glyph should provide.
Since the buffs will no longer carry over to whatever these cards transform, they lose some of their utility and power, and are thus worse versions.
As for the Elemental/Mech considerations: I think it's kind of silly to say that The Curator is a mech for some reason and Arcane Golem and Arcane Giant are not, because they don't look mechanical enough. Not only do I disagree on the latter (Arcane Golem certainly does look like a mech to me), but it would also obviously contribute to consistency, which is the point of this entire update. I can understand that War Golem is feeling different enough (though a tribal tag would give the card at least some kind of upside), but when The Curator and the other two cards look like they belong to the same type, make them the same type as well.
Regarding plantlife not counting as Elementals: I can see that in some cases, it might have gameplay implications to change all plantlike creatures into Elementals. Rogues may find use for Servant of Kalimos, when there's a good chance they might discover another Vilespine Slayer. Aside from Slayer being a ridiculously overstatted card: Would it be so bad to add this to the game? Would it cause so much confusion by telling players that living trees and flowers count as elementals in the Warcraft universe?
It's ok when Hearthstone tries to be more intuitive, and thus takes a step away from what Warcraft lore states, but drawing a line here is not really convincing me to be for the better.
And if you make up special rules as with Bogshaper, at least make it consistent with Fen Creeper and Bog Creeper. Maybe you don't want ALL plantbased minions to be Elementals, but when you say that bog beasts are for some reason, I think it would be better to follow up on it with cards that also look very similar.
-
11
massakre posted a message on Hearthstone Nerfs Coming February 5 - Equality, Cold Blood, Hunter's Mark & MorePosted in: NewsBlizzard is talking shit. There're a lot of cards that are autoinclude in any class deck unless they're running a power card that forbids or disrupts it like baku/genn/archivist/spiteful summoner/dargon's fury...
Swipe, animal companion, truesilver champ, sap, Power Word shield, wrath, eviscerate, lightning storm... What are they going to do? Nerf everyone of them when they launch new over cards with unexpected broken combinations? They're doing that right now. They don't address the issue because the issue are new broken card interactions. They must learn how to keep the meta healthy, they must nerf new cards and only basic/classic when they are a problem to dessign future cards (preparation i'm looking at you)
-
5
SparkyFlame posted a message on Hearthstone Nerfs Coming February 5 - Equality, Cold Blood, Hunter's Mark & MorePosted in: NewsBitter about Flametongue and utterly disappointed about Equality. How can they dare deploy prolly the only mass early game removal tool for Paladin. Let’s be reasonable, what are you going to swipe up the board with? True silver champion? And does that not make pyromancer even more auto-include for Control Paladin? I don’t seem to see the reason why here unless they are making space for a new “Equality” - inspired in the upcoming set.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
Whats the point of having this in standard? Its already a meme deck. Just slap a Reincarnate in there and call it a day.
5
Until you draw her again...
2
The loss in stats is large enough (even bigger than Hemet Nesingwary) that in order to for it to be worth it, the magnetised minion would need to be big enough that it could just be killed by BGH.
2
If you Emperor Thaurissan into Brann Bronzebeard + Augmented Elekk + Augmented Elekk + Lab Recruiter + Lab Recruiter + Gang Up + Gang Up you can get either 48 or 60 (depending on how the interaction of Augmented Elekk works) copy's of a card in your deck.
3
Even better in wild as it fits perfectly with Ragnaros, Lightlord
4
This is definitely some of the more creepy art I've seen on a hearthstone card. At least for me, after alien resurrection, the whole "specimen in a tube " thing always rubbed me the wrong way.
2
Except it is. America is the only place I've ever seen using the m/d/y model, which is fitting since they are also one of the only places still using the equally illogical imperial system.
7
...or you could try it in that other constructed game mode. You know, the vastly superior one. xD
2
So what? You act like standard is the only way to play when ironically its far worse than wild. xD
22