Hearthpwn

Sorcerer's Apprentice might as well be called Flamewaker's Apprentice. 

Goblin Blastmage.

I'm almost tempted to say this is more broken than Dr. Boom.

So this has been on my mind ever since grim patron has grown in numbers. Im someone who hates things that popular. because im not someone who will play a deck because someone popular played it. Anyway, We noticed alot more warriors and its most Patron Warrior and NOT CW. the thing that annoys me to hell is that people who play decks and dont even have golden cards, because honestly, i feel if you have a golden card, PLAY IT. there is no reason not play it because alot of them very beautiful. The number of patron warriors i play against that dont have golden warsong commanders,Waraxes and whirlwinds disturb me because i know they are massive tools who only netdecks and dont actually devote themselves to warrior. Its kinda like people who played face hunter and didnt have golden wolf riders. spotting netdeckers these days isnt hard.

Quote from Peteravens05 »

So this has been on my mind ever since grim patron has grown in numbers. Im someone who hates things that popular. because im not someone who will play a deck because someone popular played it. Anyway, We noticed alot more warriors and its most Patron Warrior and NOT CW. the thing that annoys me to hell is that people who play decks and dont even have golden cards, because honestly, i feel if you have a golden card, PLAY IT. there is no reason not play it because alot of them very beautiful. The number of patron warriors i play against that dont have golden warsong commanders,Waraxes and whirlwinds disturb me because i know they are massive tools who only netdecks and dont actually devote themselves to warrior. Its kinda like people who played face hunter and didnt have golden wolf riders. spotting netdeckers these days isnt hard.

i get ur point but some people like me dont use the golden version because in all honesty they look a bit of  it takes away the "FEEL" of the ambient design of the game.

golden border are so ugly its like they were gold tin foil chewed by dogs and some golden animation is just a bunch of sands swirling, dont get me wrong some golden are beautiful but some are just plain ugly.

I dont netdeck when i know the class i copy the core theme of the popular deck and put things that i used and has been good to me and tweak it from there but when it comes to class im not familiar with like warrior or shaman i just copy some other guys deck for quest.

Quote from vasil94 »

There is nothing wrong with netdecking so there's no need to explain why you are doing it. Sometimes you like somebody elses deck - use it. As far as golden cards :D. I disenchant every golden i have because my collection is still small. And there is no way to get the ones gained from leveling up without playing the class. What better way to do it than by using the most popular deck at the time. By the way, as much as you play hunter you won't get a golden Wolfrider. Or are you saying they need to play other classes they don't like in order to get it?

thats fine if you DE Golden cards, thats your choice, but cards i mentioned are ALL Basic cards : Warsong, waraxe and Whirlwind . And yes i think people who play face hunter should have more skill in playing other classes OTHER than hunter.

There is a reason NOT to play golden cards. If you want to be a roleplayer, go right ahead and make your entire deck golden. The Forsen boys will creepily keep an eye on you for the purpose of poking fun. 

Salt time. Zoo opponent is going to be disgusting as per usual? Sure, why not. 4 from both Implosions? Not a problem. Back to back Doomguard on turns 5 and 6? Please, give it to me, boy. There is not enough cancer. Mal'Ganis from Bane of Doom? Ez game, ez life.

Quote from Peteravens05 »

So this has been on my mind ever since grim patron has grown in numbers. Im someone who hates things that popular. because im not someone who will play a deck because someone popular played it. Anyway, We noticed alot more warriors and its most Patron Warrior and NOT CW. the thing that annoys me to hell is that people who play decks and dont even have golden cards, because honestly, i feel if you have a golden card, PLAY IT. there is no reason not play it because alot of them very beautiful. The number of patron warriors i play against that dont have golden warsong commanders,Waraxes and whirlwinds disturb me because i know they are massive tools who only netdecks and dont actually devote themselves to warrior. Its kinda like people who played face hunter and didnt have golden wolf riders. spotting netdeckers these days isnt hard.

Such a stupid comment ...
I play CW for more than a year and still don't have golden Warsong Commander (just got golden Whirlwind this week). Games with CW take so much time, if you don't have 4 hours to play per day you can't level up as fast as Hunter/Warlock.
And anyway, Patron Warrior is a new deck. Who can get golden Warrior cards in 2 weeks ? Guys who are playing golden Patron decks now already HAD golden Warrior cards before BRM came out.

pretty sure exp is proportional to the cards u play for example i reached lvl 60 with priest at only 380 wins in ranked while it took me 480 wins to lvl 60 my paladin( i was using midrange.)

im currently lvl 36 CW deck with only 190 wins.

%%%^^^$ shaman and all ur overload taunt bull crap why do u keep getting good crackle and taunt totem and i DCD when i had lethal fu%^^^

freaking get me finished with my freaking quest u bull crap.

final card in the deck is an acolyte uhhhhhh.

Quote from Peteravens05 »

So this has been on my mind ever since grim patron has grown in numbers. Im someone who hates things that popular. because im not someone who will play a deck because someone popular played it. Anyway, We noticed alot more warriors and its most Patron Warrior and NOT CW. the thing that annoys me to hell is that people who play decks and dont even have golden cards, because honestly, i feel if you have a golden card, PLAY IT. there is no reason not play it because alot of them very beautiful. The number of patron warriors i play against that dont have golden warsong commanders,Waraxes and whirlwinds disturb me because i know they are massive tools who only netdecks and dont actually devote themselves to warrior. Its kinda like people who played face hunter and didnt have golden wolf riders. spotting netdeckers these days isnt hard.

lol, this is fun (and a tad stupid tbh), did it ever occur to you that people might just not want to play the golden cards?! I, for instance DE all golden cards I get as I am F2P and prefer the dust ... playing a deck where I only have the golden Soulbound cards doesn't appeal to me either as my aesthetic preference tells me: either all gold or no gold - this goes to the degree that I would like to have a possibility to not play my golden hero portraits ... So your "telltale signs" might just boil down to judgements about aesthetic preferences of other players, which is tbh a pretty futile thing!!!

Good fucking lord this game is utter trash.

Why the fuck bother playing a game that gives you shit for playing for months, I have over 2700 wins and some shit bag retard with basic cards rolls me over like i'm a fucking noob. There's no excuse for a game to be this popular and simultaneously, this utterly fucking shitty. If you don't know how to reward players who have spent months of time on your garbage game to lose to trash, you deserve to be run out of business.

And a skilled hunter. Awesome, auto concede garbage. Whose fucking dumb idea was a deck that ignored the entire game, shit cards at the other persons face, and still has a >50% win rate? Fire this fucking tard and destroy his life. There's no excuse for this garbage to remotely exist.

Losing to an incredible noob with his Pay To Win Warrior. He doesn't know how to play his deck in any way, wastes his execute so fast in the game. Got 6 cards left, 2 dmg of lethal. Two Consecrations in my deck, one abusives. Nothing. And the noob? He drews the fucking cards he needs, even makes a fucking misplay at the end and has massive amount of luck. Afterwards he flames me and thinks he is awesome with rank 14. Rages me so hard losing to such fucking noobs

Quote from wg15 »

Losing to an incredible noob with his Pay To Win Warrior. He doesn't know how to play his deck in any way, wastes his execute so fast in the game. Got 6 cards left, 2 dmg of lethal. Two Consecrations in my deck, one abusives. Nothing. And the noob? He drews the fucking cards he needs, even makes a fucking misplay at the end and has massive amount of luck. Afterwards he flames me and thinks he is awesome with rank 14. Rages me so hard losing to such fucking noobs

to be fair schockadin vs CW is a one sided match, CW wrecks shockadin.

also calling someone who defeated u an idiot is hypocrisy. he won coz of gud luck there is no such thing u won some game with luck u lost some i think ur just being a sore loser with the fact that he has better card than u coz CW is chuck full of orange stuff.

if im a shockadin and encounter a golden warrior who is shocking pattern of being $$$ i would just concede.

ps i dont play shockadin and i hate the deck why im doing this. 

was not shockadin, i dont play aggro decks, was a midrange.

maintainance again blizzard pls :(

The frame on golden cards is ugly as fuck. 

Have been losing all day to face-hunters and born-again mech mage (yeah, turns out they're not all dead yet). I eventually switched on my zoolock, and endured a dozen games against warlocks.

Tough luck. 

Quote from Jinzua »

The frame on golden cards is ugly as fuck. 

OMG U GET ME!

Heartstone matchmaking:

1-Play classic paladin, %80 of matchups are zoo and face hunter.

2-Play Anti agro priest, get matched against freeze mages,druids,control warriors.