The game mechanics favor Aggro. Being ahead on board, dictating trades, etc., is good. Playing passively, simply reacting to threads is generally speaking not the optimal way to play.
Love how the decks I build regularly beat most of Tier 1 and Tier 2 on a regular basis.
Like I'm fairly certain the only meta deck I have a bad match-up against is Big Priest, which honestly would be T1 if Wild wasn't mostly aggro right now.
Oddly enough I rarely faced odd paladins and even/cubelocks. The rest of the tier 1 list is accurate.
[edit] Meh, I have faced a lot of decks on the ladder, but imho odd warrior is weaker than the average tier 2 deck.
Your opinion doesnt matter becuase stats are true and look at the meta score, cubelock and odd paladin have the lowest because they are played the least
Aviana and ramp nerfs. Too bad because Druid had some fun decks: Quest Druid, other OTK version than Star aligner (should've nerfed juicy psychmelon instead) and other wacky decks.
FWIW - this addition of the VS report has been a topic of discussion on the Wild subreddit. Relatively few players contribute to the VS data-pool in the format, and those numbers drop off even more after a new release - Wild attracts more players after the Standard meta-game settles. As a result, VS compiled complete data profiles for only four decks in the format - Even Shaman, Big Priest, Odd Rogue and Reno Warlock are the most-played decks.
The remaining 19 decks in the report all have win-rate estimates that make ranking them pointless, as the standard error associated with those estimates ranges from 2% to 7%. The OP cites the list from R4 to L, for which only Even Shaman received a complete data profile - the standard error for the remaining win-rate estimates were often over 9%.
HSReplays doesn't have a meta-page for Wild - but you can fool around with the filters on the site to help "fill in the blanks" for some of the information which the VS report lacks.
Vicious Syndicate website has released a report. I was right again. Odd Paladin is tier 1 yet people said its tier 3.
Rank 4 to Legend stats.
Big priest is being countered by Pirate Rogues on ladder, they just sap all the priest big threats back to his hand so he can't ressurect them.
Everyone is running ooze/golakka crawlers to counter pirates and kingsbane.
Where is Druid i will ask ?? :)
Dead after their ramping & combo abilities got debilitated.
Achieved Legend: S49-Even Paladin, S58 (Wild)- Odd Rouge + Even Shaman
Even Warlock - so good, the Deathknight isn't even run.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
still prefer good ol' reno over evenlock... just beats more decks
Lots of aggro. 4/6 tier 1 decks are hard aggro.
Cube lock is tier one AND better than renolock? Interesting...
Suprised odd warrior is as low as it is.
This aint that relevant cause in wild theres decks that dont have enough play to be considered in the list but are surely t2 t1 decks
The Wild format gives you a lot of aggro options. Aggro can beat aggro, midrange, and combo, which is the majority of the format.
Oddly enough I rarely faced odd paladins and even/cubelocks. The rest of the tier 1 list is accurate.
[edit] Meh, I have faced a lot of decks on the ladder, but imho odd warrior is weaker than the average tier 2 deck.
The game mechanics favor Aggro. Being ahead on board, dictating trades, etc., is good. Playing passively, simply reacting to threads is generally speaking not the optimal way to play.
Funny thing is, that I encountered 10 Cubelocks in a row today at legends ranks after this meta snapshot was released lol
Moving into https://outof.cards/members/firepaladinhs/decks
Same.... lots of them at rank 10... grrrr
It is very hard to out-match the value of Cubelock. Like Mal'Ganis? How about four of him?
Love how the decks I build regularly beat most of Tier 1 and Tier 2 on a regular basis.
Like I'm fairly certain the only meta deck I have a bad match-up against is Big Priest, which honestly would be T1 if Wild wasn't mostly aggro right now.
Your opinion doesnt matter becuase stats are true and look at the meta score, cubelock and odd paladin have the lowest because they are played the least
My god they killed Druid big time.
Aviana and ramp nerfs. Too bad because Druid had some fun decks: Quest Druid, other OTK version than Star aligner (should've nerfed juicy psychmelon instead) and other wacky decks.
FWIW - this addition of the VS report has been a topic of discussion on the Wild subreddit. Relatively few players contribute to the VS data-pool in the format, and those numbers drop off even more after a new release - Wild attracts more players after the Standard meta-game settles. As a result, VS compiled complete data profiles for only four decks in the format - Even Shaman, Big Priest, Odd Rogue and Reno Warlock are the most-played decks.
The remaining 19 decks in the report all have win-rate estimates that make ranking them pointless, as the standard error associated with those estimates ranges from 2% to 7%. The OP cites the list from R4 to L, for which only Even Shaman received a complete data profile - the standard error for the remaining win-rate estimates were often over 9%.
HSReplays doesn't have a meta-page for Wild - but you can fool around with the filters on the site to help "fill in the blanks" for some of the information which the VS report lacks.
I've been playing Even Warlock at Level 10 in Wild. It's bad - very bad. Completely destroyed by aggro and control.