How many started shooting in real live because they played video games?
Seriously man? F...king seriously? Are you one of those guys that really believes video games are terrible influences? OMG...
You are right. It is just a video game, but that doesn't mean one shoud be brainless about it. So relax....dude.
We are no longer talking just about this video game dude, you just implied that learning to shoot in real life is something wrong, and that video games have bad influences in people... so no, I reapeat, we are no longer talking just about Hearthstone here...
I don't really see the big deal. I don't BM unless I beat someone whos been BMing me all game... but if it happens to me its not that serious.
And sometimes I do have quests to complete. That one extra minion or spell could save me a game. So its rude af to me when people concede before I get to.
And sometimes I do have quests to complete. That one extra minion or spell could save me a game. So its rude af to me when people concede before I get to.
Sorry but I don't personally think that conceding is BM under any circumstances.
There are principles that go beyond opinions and can and should be endorsed by everyone. Those principles urge you or otherwise call upon you to do the right thing, which everyone knows. They are not subjective and can be considered (Kantian) "categorical imperatives" for HS.
1. Don't rope on purpose. It's morally inferior behaviour. It doesn't make you a great person. It isn't illegal but it certainly makes you a lesser man.
2. Don't say well played when your opponent makes a misplay.
3. Say well played when your opponent truly made a well play for everyone to judge.
4. Say well played when the losing side grants that to you first. IT'S THE HONOURABLE THING TO DO.
5. Don't say well played when you win. The opponent lost so he apparently didn't play well. Maybe he made a misplay or lost to bad RNG. You don't always know that so your well played cannot be substantiated. It is not a consolation for the opponent whatsoever to emote well played to him, because really the game didn't go well for him.
4. Don't say: I a sorry, my regrets and the like, because you are not sorry when you win. It is a blatant lie. You are being dishonest.
5. Don't say greetings traveller, or well met and the like when you make a great play. You probably will be roped.
6. Be honest about friend requests and don't use it to BM your opponent even more.
- Imagine that you play real live chess. You sit across the table and suddenly you shout well played, or do other HS-emotes. After a warning you would probably be banned in official games. Why should this be allowed then in Esports?
-You don't have to undergo emotes from others during a game. So an autosquelch is not different from consequently squelching at the beginning of the game. You don't BM with emotes. You are just flat out neutral. Nothing wrong with that.
- Ok saying hallo at the start of the game may seem decent. But do this emote in the first turn only if you don't want an autosquelch. So either way you introduce an autosquelch or rework the existing system.
- This is not political correctness. It's findamental human decency which amounts to respect and chevalry.
- If you are raised to peoples interest, why can't you see the current emote system is provoking BM like roping? Because if you spam emotes, or emote triumphantically your opponent will probably rope you in retaliation. Saying well played to a misplay provokes roping. It is not in the interest of people to missuse emotes.
- BM-threads keep popping up. The best prove that there is a part of the community that doesn't like the current emote-system. And don't forget the silent majority.
You can do whatever you want because Team 5 gives you that opportunity. If there weren't any emotes in the first place no one would mind. But since they are, people will defend them with all BS possible. They even invoke "logic" and "who are you to tell me...." just to justify their BM and portray it as good. Well sir you are dead wrong.
And yes thank you for your grammar lesson since english is not my native language.
You're welcome (for the grammar lesson, no sarcasm intended). Your argument, however, is hypocritical. You're criticizing the application of logic and personal liberty to the use of video game emotes but you continue to claim philosophy is a legitimate argument against emote usage. In reality, logic and personal liberty are much more applicable to the situation than philosophy, which honestly has no place in this topic as it is completely irrelevant. This is not some deep social, ethical, or moral issue, it's a video game.
You can always turn your opp emotes off if they are too annoying. Also by my experience on ''report''s , people tend to report everyone for no reason. And this is HS we are talking about. Opponent gets a topdeck? Reported. Opponent plays Cancer Pally? Reported. Blizzard making a report system on HS will just be a waste of time for them.
How many started shooting in real live because they played video games?
Actually very few, believe it or not. Most of those people who have committed mass shootings were already suffering from some sort of psychological or mental disorder, and the video games they played had little to no impact on their decision to kill innocents. Most of them suffered from a mental/psychological disorder that distorted their perceptions of reality or caused them to commit those senseless acts of violence.
This is a completely unrelated situation however and your comparison is a huge stretch.
Everything is subjective in the sense that it depends on how you look at it. Perspectivism it is called. But there there are perspectives that resides over others which makes them honorable to pursue. Those perspectives are them called "not subjective." BM is wrong and that statement I call not subjective. It is an categorical imperative which means that most people in the world will state that bad mannering is wrong, whether you BM or not.
Discriminating gays for example because of their sexual orientation is wrong and I hope you recognize that. From a certain perspective some may justify their bad attitude towards gays by stating that homeosexually is "not natural." This is clearly subjective and not categorical in terms of Human Rightswhich is the standard here. So the standard for HS is not BMing. And that should be the HS-right for every player.
So indeed it is not in the interest of people to misuse emotes. In reaction you'll be roped, it becomes an attitude towards all. You justify BM to annoy your opponent? Well sir there is no justification for bad mannering at all. That it is done doesn't justify it.
My personal experience doesn't count here. I'm not talking subjectively. I'm talking about how to be good mannered. And since most of the earthians will endorse good manners and not BM, it is universially shared. Plain and simple Kantianism. Logic fallacies has nothing to do with it.
Lmao, pretending that Kantian categorical imperative is an objective fact instead than a personal philosophical take on the morals... Do you know why Philosophy is not acknowledged any scientific status in the modern era?: because it's simply not fucking objective, it's just about a very personal interpretation of data, deal with it.
In the end all the wanna-be-objective moral laws become personal ethics, simply because your -or anyone's- point of view has no universal reach no matter how many pointless disquisitions you may fabricate about it.
You may eagerly try to convince a redneck about the indisputable rightfulness of your convictions and teach him that he has not rational reasons to worship snakes, to marry his cousins and to drink methyl alcohol 24/7, but in the end you'd probably end up with a shotgun up your ass, and I wouldn't call that any less logical and convincing than any of your propositions.
Stop pretending you're a guru, you don't even remotely qualify for that: your arguments are very often fallacious and your lectures make make people cringe all the times.
Agreed. Sadly when you point out the logical fallacies in the arguments of individuals, they just resort to the same fallacious arguments to defend themselves, clearly ignorant of the fact that a logical fallacy cannot be defended by another logical fallacy. Not even sure why this guy is trying to apply philosophy to video game emotes anyway.
And sometimes I do have quests to complete. That one extra minion or spell could save me a game. So its rude af to me when people concede before I get to.
Sorry but I don't personally think that conceding is BM under any circumstances.
This.
If I'm losing, and I am absolutely sure that there is no way for me to win, I drop a "Well Played" as my "gg" and concede. No point in wasting my time. Not being rude, just saying that I don't see a reason to keep going if you know you lost. I don't think it matters either way but that fact that someone considers conceding to be BM kind is kind of ridiculous. If one extra minion or spell could have completed that quest, you'll finish it in your next match. No need to get angry.
There's is no objectivity. Just perspectivism and relativism. Your arguments fail because they are perspectivistic as hell. With a Master in Philosophy of Science and Political Science you do not want to debate philosophy, logic and fallacies with me. I will leave it at that. After all it is just a video game...isn't it. But maybe I should come to the conclusion that all opposing me here are just those for whom BM is a first nature.
The first thing you do when someone leads off with their credentials is smile politely and say ok. The second thing you do is laugh at them on the inside. I know you must be smarter than everyone but to tell you the truth nobody here gives a fuck kid.
Punish people......
Make your own game and run it the way you want kid. You don't like getting your ass whipped don't fucking play if you can't stand to lose. The internet gave every little pin dick dork some balls. Laugh and move on like everyone else.
Everything is subjective in the sense that it depends on how you look at it. Perspectivism it is called. But there there are perspectives that resides over others which makes them honorable to pursue. Those perspectives are them called "not subjective." BM is wrong and that statement I call not subjective. It is an categorical imperative which means that most people in the world will state that bad mannering is wrong, whether you BM or not.
Discriminating gays for example because of their sexual orientation is wrong and I hope you recognize that. From a certain perspective some may justify their bad attitude towards gays by stating that homeosexually is "not natural." This is clearly subjective and not categorical in terms of Human Rightswhich is the standard here. So the standard for HS is not BMing. And that should be the HS-right for every player.
So indeed it is not in the interest of people to misuse emotes. In reaction you'll be roped, it becomes an attitude towards all. You justify BM to annoy your opponent? Well sir there is no justification for bad mannering at all. That it is done doesn't justify it.
My personal experience doesn't count here. I'm not talking subjectively. I'm talking about how to be good mannered. And since most of the earthians will endorse good manners and not BM, it is universially shared. Plain and simple Kantianism. Logic fallacies has nothing to do with it.
Lmao, pretending that Kantian categorical imperative is an objective fact instead than a personal philosophical take on the morals... Do you know why Philosophy is not acknowledged any scientific status in the modern era?: because it's simply not fucking objective, it's just about a very personal interpretation of data, deal with it.
In the end all the wanna-be-objective moral laws become personal ethics, simply because your -or anyone's- point of view has no universal reach no matter how many pointless disquisitions you may fabricate about it.
You may eagerly try to convince a redneck about the indisputable rightfulness of your convictions and teach him that he has not rational reasons to worship snakes, to marry his cousins and to drink methyl alcohol 24/7, but in the end you'd probably end up with a shotgun up your ass, and I wouldn't call that any less logical and convincing than any of your propositions.
Stop pretending you're a guru, you don't even remotely qualify for that: your arguments are very often fallacious and your lectures make make people cringe all the times.
There's is no objectivity. Just perspectivism and relativism. Your arguments fail because they are perspectivistic as hell. With a Master in Philosophy of Science and Political Science you do not want to debate philosophy, logic and fallacies with me. I will leave it at that. After all it is just a video game...isn't it. But maybe I should come to the conclusion that all opposing me here are just those for whom BM is a first nature.
Agreed. Sadly when you point out the logical fallacies in the arguments of individuals, they just resort to the same fallacious arguments to defend themselves, clearly ignorant of the fact that a logical fallacy cannot be defended by another logical fallacy. Not even sure why this guy is trying to apply philosophy to video game emotes anyway.
All your values and oppinions have a philosophical basis. Your oppinion on BM is no exception. Whether you like it or not or are actually aware of it.
You have a Master's Degree in Philosophy of Science and Political Science yet even those who do not can recognize the many logical fallacies in your argument. Your hypocrisy is evident in all of your posts. You cannot dismiss someone's argument as being perspectivist (and yes, that is the right word, perspectivistic is not a word in the English language) when your initial statement was purely based upon philosophical reasoning, an area of study that is almost entirely based on perspective.
Coming to the conclusion that all who disagree with you are just people who BM is perhaps the most unintelligent reasoning I have ever heard or read. You claim to be a philosophical guru yet lack understanding of even the most basic components of logical reasoning.
Tell me, how did you come to the conlcusion that me pointing out your logical fallacies had even the slightest philosophical basis? I merely wished to correct your poorly constructed argument by pointing out its flaws, and believe me, it had many.
Stop grandstanding, whether or not you have a higher education means little considering the fact that you resort to the same tactics children use in debates.
Your arguments fail because they are perspectivistic as hell. With a Master in Philosophy of Science and Political Science you do not want to debate philosophy, logic and fallacies with me. I will leave it at that.
Oh please You Almighty Indisputable Lord of Logic!, don't smite me with your superior reasoning!! // Perspectivism is just Nietzsche's personal label for relativism; relativism is a personal interpretation of data; any interpretation made by any sentient being is just as legitimate and qualified and any one else's; so your interpretation is just as legit as mine; except I'm having more fun from ridiculing you than you're getting by reiterating your null, tautological BS over and over again.
these topics always give me laughs....this has devolved into a pin dick dork post fight....the internet has given you all balls. I'd love to start a new MMA for forum fighters to come and bring their fat slob asses out of the house and really fight. That would bring in some dollars and better yet millions of LAUGHS.
I wish there was a way to report people who friend you and start cursing you out and stuff. Not because I'm particularly offended by it, but hey, if I could push a button and punish them, why not?
As far as in game stuff (roping, etc.), I always laugh when people post these topics because they always seem to say things like "I hate it when people rope me! I only rope when it's Hunter or Secret Pally!"
When it comes to people overplaying their hand or refusing to kill you, just CONCEDE. As long as you are gambling on the chance they screw up, it's completely on you for wasting your own time.
The second I get a hint of the person on the other end being a douche I just squelch them.
If they rope, that's fine, it's their time to use how they want. Even if it is being used to be royal cunt.
I gladly accept friend requests after the game. I've had some nice conversations with people that way. If they want to cuss me me out or belittle me, that's fine. They're either really bothered by how bad they got beat or they need to put others down to make themselves feel better. Either way, I'm a better person than they are.
I feel like the number of people "b'ming" is exaggerated. Personally, I don't run into a lot of emote spammers or ropers, and this is from Rank 25 all the way to Legend. Maybe I'm getting lucky, or you people are overreacting to stuff like the greetings at the start of a game, or the "well played" at the end of it. Even if your opponent sends out a greeting when they get lucky, or an "oops" for something unlucky/embarrassing, it's just friendly banter that is seen as an insult. Honestly, you people need to chill and treat Hearthstone like what it is: a game.
There are principles that go beyond opinions and can and should be endorsed by everyone. Those principles urge you or otherwise call upon you to do the right thing, which everyone knows. They are not subjective and can be considered (Kantian) "categorical imperatives" for HS.
1. Don't rope on purpose. It's morally inferior behaviour. It doesn't make you a great person. It isn't illegal but it certainly makes you a lesser man.
2. Don't say well played when your opponent makes a misplay.
3. Say well played when your opponent truly made a well play for everyone to judge.
4. Say well played when the losing side grants that to you first. IT'S THE HONOURABLE THING TO DO.
5. Don't say well played when you win. The opponent lost so he apparently didn't play well. Maybe he made a misplay or lost to bad RNG. You don't always know that so your well played cannot be substantiated. It is not a consolation for the opponent whatsoever to emote well played to him, because really the game didn't go well for him.
4. Don't say: I a sorry, my regrets and the like, because you are not sorry when you win. It is a blatant lie. You are being dishonest.
5. Don't say greetings traveller, or well met and the like when you make a great play. You probably will be roped.
6. Be honest about friend requests and don't use it to BM your opponent even more.
- Imagine that you play real live chess. You sit across the table and suddenly you shout well played, or do other HS-emotes. After a warning you would probably be banned in official games. Why should this be allowed then in Esports?
-You don't have to undergo emotes from others during a game. So an autosquelch is not different from consequently squelching at the beginning of the game. You don't BM with emotes. You are just flat out neutral. Nothing wrong with that.
- Ok saying hallo at the start of the game may seem decent. But do this emote in the first turn only if you don't want an autosquelch. So either way you introduce an autosquelch or rework the existing system.
- This is not political correctness. It's findamental human decency which amounts to respect and chevalry.
- If you are raised to peoples interest, why can't you see the current emote system is provoking BM like roping? Because if you spam emotes, or emote triumphantically your opponent will probably rope you in retaliation. Saying well played to a misplay provokes roping. It is not in the interest of people to missuse emotes.
- BM-threads keep popping up. The best prove that there is a part of the community that doesn't like the current emote-system. And don't forget the silent majority.
You won't know whether I rope on purpose or I'm just slow,
You won't know whether I BM or I am sorry for that Owl.
Simple emotes really shouldn't make your blood bowl.
You're not my mother and can't tell me what to do, bro,
HS really does not need that so far. BM is for fun and it is so limited. Some1 can't do much if you don't add them to see them curse :D
If they spam emotes that is max that they can do & you can also silence it if you wish. If they rope np it is their and your right. If they rope use that time to plan for next turn.
BM'ing doesn't seem so bad to me in the game, but then again I squelch at the first sign that my opponent is either an asshole or has emoterrhea.
I certainly never mind a "Well Played" at the end, win or lose, although I won't emote it if I win unless my opponent does first.
I don't really see the big deal. I don't BM unless I beat someone whos been BMing me all game... but if it happens to me its not that serious.
And sometimes I do have quests to complete. That one extra minion or spell could save me a game. So its rude af to me when people concede before I get to.
Who decided that you should be our moral compass? Sanctimonious load of tripe that you posted.
We will act and behave as we see fit, not how some little upstart tells us to.
I try to be polite to all my opponents and if they are poor sports that keep pressing the emotes I just squelch and keep playing.
I always begin with a friendly greeting and sadly for the most part players do not return the gesture.
But this is not a problem that needs any kind of report system if anything that would create more problems then it would solve.
You Kant always get what you want WiseAsPlato
Im on the boat of only reporting the players who BM you through chat after befriending you.
There's is no objectivity. Just perspectivism and relativism. Your arguments fail because they are perspectivistic as hell. With a Master in Philosophy of Science and Political Science you do not want to debate philosophy, logic and fallacies with me. I will leave it at that. After all it is just a video game...isn't it. But maybe I should come to the conclusion that all opposing me here are just those for whom BM is a first nature.
The first thing you do when someone leads off with their credentials is smile politely and say ok. The second thing you do is laugh at them on the inside. I know you must be smarter than everyone but to tell you the truth nobody here gives a fuck kid.
Punish people......
Make your own game and run it the way you want kid. You don't like getting your ass whipped don't fucking play if you can't stand to lose. The internet gave every little pin dick dork some balls. Laugh and move on like everyone else.
If you have a problem with what other people do on their turn, maybe you should just stick to solitaire.
When did gamers become such sensitive crybabies?
Coming to the conclusion that all who disagree with you are just people who BM is perhaps the most unintelligent reasoning I have ever heard or read. You claim to be a philosophical guru yet lack understanding of even the most basic components of logical reasoning.
Tell me, how did you come to the conlcusion that me pointing out your logical fallacies had even the slightest philosophical basis? I merely wished to correct your poorly constructed argument by pointing out its flaws, and believe me, it had many.
Stop grandstanding, whether or not you have a higher education means little considering the fact that you resort to the same tactics children use in debates.
these topics always give me laughs....this has devolved into a pin dick dork post fight....the internet has given you all balls. I'd love to start a new MMA for forum fighters to come and bring their fat slob asses out of the house and really fight. That would bring in some dollars and better yet millions of LAUGHS.
I wish there was a way to report people who friend you and start cursing you out and stuff. Not because I'm particularly offended by it, but hey, if I could push a button and punish them, why not?
As far as in game stuff (roping, etc.), I always laugh when people post these topics because they always seem to say things like "I hate it when people rope me! I only rope when it's Hunter or Secret Pally!"
When it comes to people overplaying their hand or refusing to kill you, just CONCEDE. As long as you are gambling on the chance they screw up, it's completely on you for wasting your own time.
The second I get a hint of the person on the other end being a douche I just squelch them.
If they rope, that's fine, it's their time to use how they want. Even if it is being used to be royal cunt.
I gladly accept friend requests after the game. I've had some nice conversations with people that way. If they want to cuss me me out or belittle me, that's fine. They're either really bothered by how bad they got beat or they need to put others down to make themselves feel better. Either way, I'm a better person than they are.
Water off a ducks back.
I feel like the number of people "b'ming" is exaggerated. Personally, I don't run into a lot of emote spammers or ropers, and this is from Rank 25 all the way to Legend. Maybe I'm getting lucky, or you people are overreacting to stuff like the greetings at the start of a game, or the "well played" at the end of it. Even if your opponent sends out a greeting when they get lucky, or an "oops" for something unlucky/embarrassing, it's just friendly banter that is seen as an insult. Honestly, you people need to chill and treat Hearthstone like what it is: a game.
HS really does not need that so far. BM is for fun and it is so limited. Some1 can't do much if you don't add them to see them curse :D
If they spam emotes that is max that they can do & you can also silence it if you wish. If they rope np it is their and your right. If they rope use that time to plan for next turn.
if they spam you don't need report option cos most would abuse it. You can just silence their emotes click on their face. No more spam.