Hearthpwn

I personally like the name and art, not sure if non traditional card background are valid or not though.

With that said, it seems stronger than Malygos  even though its fragile. I would throw in "Has Spell Damage +1..."

sidenote: For some reason I really wish they would add an Enrage: Spell Damage +1 or +2 minion to the game.

@Shadicar Sorry I'm on my phone so quoting doesn't work, my reply was @Animaker, he's treating the "for each x in y and z" as IF it's an "if x is in y and z" statement so I was stating that "for each" does not mean "if" as he's trying to show us.

Here are my ideas so far. Anyone like any of these?

The one on the left is designed for decks that might go to fatigue. If you get it early in the game, it replaces itself with another card, making it easier to hit early game combos. Late in the game, it's a big Taunt minion that might win you the game. The one in the middle is like Drakonid Crusher: it has below curve stats normally, but is above curve later in the game. I did a quick informal census of card costs in decks. An aggro deck has a total card Cost of 55, a midrange deck had a total cost of 87, and a control deck had a total cost of 115. This card would trigger quite early in the game for an aggro deck, but why would they want a card like this? It would be pretty late game for a control deck to use this, but it seems about right for a midrange deck, which was my intention. 

Also, I just came up with this card:

It's designed for use with Burgle, Gang Up, Undercity Huckster, Nefarian, and even Grand Crusader 

Quote from TehCop >>

Oh whoops, meant that to be a Mage card.

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from TehCop >>

I don't really like the name, but I can't think of anything else.

North/Deep Sea Rider/Cavalry? Not sure about the balance tho, since u put some lolo random class on it and not an existing one :P

 

Quote from Adamaxes >>

Currently two possible thoughts for this week. It is kinda weird for me because I don't usually make legendaries but this week I have made two legendaries in a row.

Both cards interacts with C'Thun, while one denies it, the other buffs it.

The first one silences C'Thun. And the issue here is that since silence removes both card text and enhancements, after silencing, C'Thun's battlecry no longer triggers. Another thing is that it works for both sides, just like Stalagg and Feugen. So you definitely don't want to put it into your own C'Thun deck.

The second one buffs C'Thun, while it only triggers when both player has C'Thun and both player hasn't draw it yet. If it triggers, the game might turn into a top deck mode in which the player who draws C'Thun first will more likely to win the game. Though this card is greatly based on RNG, we have to admit that this game is mostly based on RNG. Also, old gods LOVE chaos, aren't they?

Any advice? I think these cards may require further modifications. 

Quote from Adamaxes >>

Quote from Adamaxes >>

Currently two possible thoughts for this week. It is kinda weird for me because I don't usually make legendaries but this week I have made two legendaries in a row.

Both cards interacts with C'Thun, while one denies it, the other buffs it.

The first one silences C'Thun. And the issue here is that since silence removes both card text and enhancements, after silencing, C'Thun's battlecry no longer triggers. Another thing is that it works for both sides, just like Stalagg and Feugen. So you definitely don't want to put it into your own C'Thun deck.

The second one buffs C'Thun, while it only triggers when both player has C'Thun and both player hasn't draw it yet. If it triggers, the game might turn into a top deck mode in which the player who draws C'Thun first will more likely to win the game. Though this card is greatly based on RNG, we have to admit that this game is mostly based on RNG. Also, old gods LOVE chaos, aren't they?

Any advice? I think these cards may require further modifications. 

 I would like to get some feedbacks on these cards. Any thoughts?

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Here are my ideas so far. Anyone like any of these?

The one on the left is designed for decks that might go to fatigue. If you get it early in the game, it replaces itself with another card, making it easier to hit early game combos. Late in the game, it's a big Taunt minion that might win you the game. The one in the middle is like Drakonid Crusher: it has below curve stats normally, but is above curve later in the game. I did a quick informal census of card costs in decks. An aggro deck has a total card Cost of 55, a midrange deck had a total cost of 87, and a control deck had a total cost of 115. This card would trigger quite early in the game for an aggro deck, but why would they want a card like this? It would be pretty late game for a control deck to use this, but it seems about right for a midrange deck, which was my intention. 

Also, I just came up with this card:

It's designed for use with Burgle, Gang Up, Undercity Huckster, Nefarian, and even Grand Crusader 

 

Quote from Adamaxes >>

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Here are my ideas so far. Anyone like any of these?

The one on the left is designed for decks that might go to fatigue. If you get it early in the game, it replaces itself with another card, making it easier to hit early game combos. Late in the game, it's a big Taunt minion that might win you the game. The one in the middle is like Drakonid Crusher: it has below curve stats normally, but is above curve later in the game. I did a quick informal census of card costs in decks. An aggro deck has a total card Cost of 55, a midrange deck had a total cost of 87, and a control deck had a total cost of 115. This card would trigger quite early in the game for an aggro deck, but why would they want a card like this? It would be pretty late game for a control deck to use this, but it seems about right for a midrange deck, which was my intention. 

Also, I just came up with this card:

It's designed for use with Burgle, Gang Up, Undercity Huckster, Nefarian, and even Grand Crusader 

 I actually like the idea of infiltrator and I would make it 5 mana 4/4 instead.

 And actually, I am trying to avoid making legendaries every time I make a card, since making a legendary card may cause problems for most of the times. The reason I made legendaries this week is that my friend desperately wanted me to do so. Maybe I will consider about other ideas.

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Quote from Adamaxes >>

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Here are my ideas so far. Anyone like any of these?

The one on the left is designed for decks that might go to fatigue. If you get it early in the game, it replaces itself with another card, making it easier to hit early game combos. Late in the game, it's a big Taunt minion that might win you the game. The one in the middle is like Drakonid Crusher: it has below curve stats normally, but is above curve later in the game. I did a quick informal census of card costs in decks. An aggro deck has a total card Cost of 55, a midrange deck had a total cost of 87, and a control deck had a total cost of 115. This card would trigger quite early in the game for an aggro deck, but why would they want a card like this? It would be pretty late game for a control deck to use this, but it seems about right for a midrange deck, which was my intention. 

Also, I just came up with this card:

It's designed for use with Burgle, Gang Up, Undercity Huckster, Nefarian, and even Grand Crusader 

 I actually like the idea of infiltrator and I would make it 5 mana 4/4 instead.

I'm not sure I want to increase the cost, because it becomes prohibitively difficult to Combo it. And it's already triply restrictive, in that you need to combo it, you have to have other classes' cards (which means it doesn't even work against other Rogues), and you can only target minions of that class. What if it were a 4 mana 3/3 or 4/2 though?