You must be a total noob if you think that razakus priest doesn't require much skill to play. It's an entirely skill based deck. The choices you make throughout the game could be the difference between winning or losing. A noob playing the deck is going to have a significantly lower win rate than an expert of the deck.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Check out my Earth, Wind, and Fire - Elemental Shaman deck!
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
Look vicius syndicate last report, the Hl priest is tier 3, the people thank complin for the priest is for the Hl priest
Raw data pulled out of someones ass mean nothing. If you only look on rare stats, Patron Warrior was a bad deck back then, when every pro said, it's the best deck at the moment, because all the Billys on rank 20 ruined the overall winratio of Patron. Patron was still the best deck even with an overall bad winratio. Same applies to Highlander-Priest now.
Blizzard should make a special stream lessons or youtube videos in which they explain the the only way hs should be played is with supa dupa 1000 IQ control/combo homebrewed decks and 30 minutes long match is a minimum time period that proves you're not braindead blah blah something etc.
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
agro druid is broken as well. yes it depends on card draw, but more often than not you can smorc them down in 4 turns or force concede.
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
agro druid is broken as well. yes it depends on card draw, but more often than not you can smorc them down in 4 turns or force concede.
Yeah didn't mean to specify Jade per se (big Druid is solid too), Paladin is pretty strong right now too. The idea that Priest is low-tier is what boggles my mind.
I find Priest to be very not fun to play against. It takes little skill to win with. It takes equally little skill to beat it. With some deck styles you can play smartly and play around things but with priest, it's got a Quest Rogue feel to it. Pretty non-interactive. They just keep clearing the board until they can play their win condition. There's no real set up for it. Draw Raza. Draw Kaza. Win or not.
I'd rather play weird decks that require more thought and skill. Not that I'm a skilled player - far from it. My best rank ever was rank 10, I rarely advance past 15. I don't even try to. But I get more fun out of losing games where I had to think a lot than I do out of crap like Aggro Druid.
I'm the same way with other games. I play a lot of Civ 6. I'm not particularly good at it, but I enjoy the intellectual challenge of it. Same with Hearthstone. Decks that make it hard to enjoy the game are frustrating. Razakas priest is one of those. Frankly, so is Big Priest. Mostly just a matter of getting the right draws at the right time. Very hard to beat if not. That's just not fun. Not fun to play the deck, not fun to play against the deck.
I like agro druid, it is fun to work out all the possible OP synergy possibilities. Granted it's probably more braindead than say "quest mage" but I'm a novice at this game, and something like agro druid allows me to learn things about the game I don't with zoolock. With zoolock I nearly always win as I know the archtype very well, and with the crad draw hero power and disco with malchezars IMP I can cycle my cards like a boss and get what I need to win. It has so many 1 drops you rarely ever get a bad starting hand, and I more often than not get kele in my muligan, or right after and also pirates.
With agro druid you really need the right cards fast, or you will loose. I guess it's more RNG based deck, but there are tons of little parts within the deck you can get the win from. for instance buffing up a crypt lords health, possibly keeping it alive through a living mana for maximum possible, then using a crazed alchemist to change it's health to it's attack them smorc.. game over
TBH I happen to think dragon priest works just the same, you get your inner fire combo and then it's game over. yet no one seems to rag on DP quite as much as they do agro druid.
For a relavtively budget deck and for newer players, agro druid is a good way of teaching them the game I feel. It is OP if you get good card draw and play well (around clears etc) but otherwise it's garbage.
If you play bad, even with good RNG you will loose very quickly with it.. it's like a riskier version of zoo, with some insane buf potential available. I personally like using evolving spore and a lot of taunts/strongshell playing a slower game than the typical agro druid. There are tons of options available.. I like that.
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
agro druid is broken as well. yes it depends on card draw, but more often than not you can smorc them down in 4 turns or force concede.
Yeah didn't mean to specify Jade per se (big Druid is solid too), Paladin is pretty strong right now too. The idea that Priest is low-tier is what boggles my mind.
I love murloc pally, it's my favourite deck right now. I don't play it personally as it's a bit expensive for me, but I love to watch people play it and play against it.
my favourite match up right now is playing a relatively budget agro druid deck against a murloc pally with all the bells and whistles then trying to smorc each others face off as fast as pos. it usually ends up in a drawn out carnage fest, and you never know who is going to win.
my worst match up is evolve shaman as it's so unpredictable, you never really know what's going to happen.
I used to play evolve in old gods and thoroughly enjoyed it though, it's really fun deck to play.
I only currently play kelseth zoolock and agro druid though as I am trying to save resources for new meta. I built my kele deck when I first came back to the game with all my nerf dust and dust from cycled out cards, then built agro druid as a budget alternative as I wanted to try something different.
I'm hoping to build a rogue and priest for next meta as I've never played those neither.. dragon priest and secret or tempo rogue probably. tempo is going to be nuts next meta, calling it now (same with dragon priest)
Priest is a gay class that is so braindead and pay to win like this game that im glad i quit reeeee if u play priest u gay
dragon priest is good. it's relatively cheap as well, you don't even need any legendaries for it.. although lyra does fit it perfectly. You can play it without her though.
Razakus Priest is not a deck for low skill players, really?It is a deck where you have to take a lot of differents decisions and administrate your resources appropiately because you are normally behind in tempo.
Razakus Priest is not a deck for low skill players, really?It is a deck where you have to take a lot of differents decisions and administrate your resources appropiately because you are normally behind in tempo.
it's actually a lot harder to play than people assume. you can really tell the difference between the skill level of players when you play against this deck IMO. I can beat a machine gun priest, even after they DK if they are not good enough to have stored up enough cards to get their hero power off. However a skilled player will annihilate you once they get the DK off as they have built a hand to play to keep playing the hero power.
I don't know tons about the deck tbf, only that I can tell the difference between the deck in a skilled players hands, Vs a novice.
I think some people just make a deck look easy because they are good.
I hit legend rank like 8 times, iam not noob looser
I highly doubt that considering you think all those decks you listed have a high win rate against Priest. there's a reason in competitive play it is the most banned class.
Shaman is bottom tier what are you on about? The only reason why Raza priest has a low win rate is because it is one of the three best decks at the moment and everybody is teching against and targeting it. Priest is next to rogue as the most targeted deck that is banned in tournament play.
Shaman is bottom tier what are you on about? The only reason why Raza priest has a low win rate is because it is one of the three best decks at the moment and everybody is teching against and targeting it. Priest is next to rogue as the most targeted deck that is banned in tournament play.
evolve shaman is still good when played well though. I've beaten by it a lot of times. I guess it really does highly depend on RNG a lot as well, but I've certainly played some good evolve players that made the game highly annoying.
I love Priest and it was always my favorite class (because of the Dragons theme) however i really hate the current Priest because everybody plays either Big or Highlander Priest, both are 100% high roll decks who don´t require much braincells to win (that´s what high roll stands for). It´s just not fun to play against (like most current meta decks).
The main reason why I hate losing against highlander priest is because I have the feeling that this is a deck that does not punish players for horrible mistakes as long as they draw everything they need.
I am playing midrange/control paladin most of the time. I can win but I need to be very lucky. Too many answers... Go fill board board with small minions, even 4 attack minions. Get fucked by dragonfire, pint size horror is even worse. Play high attack minions after DK and they machine gun them down.
Seriously. The power level is way too high compared to other dks. Of course it is a synergy with Raza but that needs to be considered. I think the hero power should be nerved to either allow for minions or face only... Or something like after you play a card do something... Random or face damage. It sucks that priest DK does not need to fight for a board anymore. It's lame...
I love Priest and it was always my favorite class (because of the Dragons theme) however i really hate the current Priest because everybody plays either Big or Highlander Priest, both are 100% high roll decks who don´t require much braincells to win (that´s what high roll stands for). It´s just not fun to play against (like most current meta decks).
dragon priest next meta, though.. looking forward to it, a lot. (it's good now tbh though, just it's going to get better)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
You must be a total noob if you think that razakus priest doesn't require much skill to play. It's an entirely skill based deck. The choices you make throughout the game could be the difference between winning or losing. A noob playing the deck is going to have a significantly lower win rate than an expert of the deck.
Check out my Earth, Wind, and Fire - Elemental Shaman deck!
With agro druid you really need the right cards fast, or you will loose. I guess it's more RNG based deck, but there are tons of little parts within the deck you can get the win from. for instance buffing up a crypt lords health, possibly keeping it alive through a living mana for maximum possible, then using a crazed alchemist to change it's health to it's attack them smorc.. game over
TBH I happen to think dragon priest works just the same, you get your inner fire combo and then it's game over. yet no one seems to rag on DP quite as much as they do agro druid.
For a relavtively budget deck and for newer players, agro druid is a good way of teaching them the game I feel. It is OP if you get good card draw and play well (around clears etc) but otherwise it's garbage.
If you play bad, even with good RNG you will loose very quickly with it.. it's like a riskier version of zoo, with some insane buf potential available. I personally like using evolving spore and a lot of taunts/strongshell playing a slower game than the typical agro druid. There are tons of options available.. I like that.
That's the case with litterally any deck in any card game...
my favourite match up right now is playing a relatively budget agro druid deck against a murloc pally with all the bells and whistles then trying to smorc each others face off as fast as pos. it usually ends up in a drawn out carnage fest, and you never know who is going to win.
my worst match up is evolve shaman as it's so unpredictable, you never really know what's going to happen.
I used to play evolve in old gods and thoroughly enjoyed it though, it's really fun deck to play.
I only currently play kelseth zoolock and agro druid though as I am trying to save resources for new meta. I built my kele deck when I first came back to the game with all my nerf dust and dust from cycled out cards, then built agro druid as a budget alternative as I wanted to try something different.
I'm hoping to build a rogue and priest for next meta as I've never played those neither.. dragon priest and secret or tempo rogue probably. tempo is going to be nuts next meta, calling it now (same with dragon priest)
Razakus Priest is not a deck for low skill players, really?It is a deck where you have to take a lot of differents decisions and administrate your resources appropiately because you are normally behind in tempo.
I don't know tons about the deck tbf, only that I can tell the difference between the deck in a skilled players hands, Vs a novice.
I think some people just make a deck look easy because they are good.
Fun and interactive.
Shaman is bottom tier what are you on about? The only reason why Raza priest has a low win rate is because it is one of the three best decks at the moment and everybody is teching against and targeting it. Priest is next to rogue as the most targeted deck that is banned in tournament play.
Is this question even real?
Best quotes:
"Casual is perfectly fine"
"warlock is not overpowered"
"Playing odd paladin just to test it"
I love Priest and it was always my favorite class (because of the Dragons theme) however i really hate the current Priest because everybody plays either Big or Highlander Priest, both are 100% high roll decks who don´t require much braincells to win (that´s what high roll stands for). It´s just not fun to play against (like most current meta decks).
I love priest, I never had any problem whatsoever with priest. Druids though...
The main reason why I hate losing against highlander priest is because I have the feeling that this is a deck that does not punish players for horrible mistakes as long as they draw everything they need.
I am playing midrange/control paladin most of the time. I can win but I need to be very lucky. Too many answers... Go fill board board with small minions, even 4 attack minions. Get fucked by dragonfire, pint size horror is even worse. Play high attack minions after DK and they machine gun them down.
Seriously. The power level is way too high compared to other dks. Of course it is a synergy with Raza but that needs to be considered. I think the hero power should be nerved to either allow for minions or face only... Or something like after you play a card do something... Random or face damage. It sucks that priest DK does not need to fight for a board anymore. It's lame...