Priest now have a miserable winrate if you compare with rogues, warlocks , druids, shamans. for now is a tier 3 deck... What is the point of complain about this? until pirate warrior have better winrate
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
On the third day before Witchwood, Blizzard gave to me,
I have taken Priest to rank 5 three months in a row during the first ten days of each month. I do not write this to brag in ANY way. But how did you manage to get a ‘miserable winrate’?
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
Look vicius syndicate last report, the Hl priest is tier 3, the people thank complin for the priest is for the Hl priest
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
Look vicius syndicate last report, the Hl priest is tier 3, the people thank complin for the priest is for the Hl priest
This can’t be true because taking Priest to rank 5 has been easy for me the last 3 months. And I am not the greatest HS player of all time, lol :)
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
Look vicius syndicate last report, the Hl priest is tier 3, the people thank complin for the priest is for the Hl priest
Well personaly, i don't know about the list but i reaached legend 2 months in a row with priest and have %65 wr. Razakus priest is broken as hell
I find Priest to be very not fun to play against. It takes little skill to win with. It takes equally little skill to beat it. With some deck styles you can play smartly and play around things but with priest, it's got a Quest Rogue feel to it. Pretty non-interactive. They just keep clearing the board until they can play their win condition. There's no real set up for it. Draw Raza. Draw Kaza. Win or not.
I'd rather play weird decks that require more thought and skill. Not that I'm a skilled player - far from it. My best rank ever was rank 10, I rarely advance past 15. I don't even try to. But I get more fun out of losing games where I had to think a lot than I do out of crap like Aggro Druid.
I'm the same way with other games. I play a lot of Civ 6. I'm not particularly good at it, but I enjoy the intellectual challenge of it. Same with Hearthstone. Decks that make it hard to enjoy the game are frustrating. Razakas priest is one of those. Frankly, so is Big Priest. Mostly just a matter of getting the right draws at the right time. Very hard to beat if not. That's just not fun. Not fun to play the deck, not fun to play against the deck.
1. People don't care about statistics, like the vS data reaper which shows through algorithms that Razakus is worse than Paladin, Warlock, Druid, Rogue and Shaman. They just wanna jump on the streamer whining bandwagon.
2. People overreact to new cards shown. They see psychic scream and think they instantly know how it will affect the meta, and already are certain it will make Priest so dominant no deck can compete. This is reasonable, however, because the community has never been wrong about a card that should destroy the meta. I mean come on, when was the last time you played ladder without queuing into those meta destroying Marsh Queen hunters?
3. Losing to Priest is apparently "unfun". Apparently, there are people who have the time of their lives losing to other decks.
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
is one of the most difficult deck to play right now...
big druid is the easiest deck to play
Correct-o-mundo. Raza priest is extremely skill intensive. Any deck that's not a curve deck requires serious decision making every turn. And when you can have a high wnrate even when not drawing Raza anduin that takes skill
The reason is that both against Big Priest and Razakus, if you lose, it is after you have played much more intensively on Tempo than they do, crucially because they tend to ignore the board for many turns.
And then suddenly beaten down to death, with few humongous cards or summons.
It does not always happen. But when you lose like that, it feels like being beaten down by a very lazy and lucky playstyle, even if it isn't.
It is the same kind of feeling you get against Exodia Mage and Jade/Ramp Druid.
Pre-nerf Quest Rogue was the epitome of this. Much more painful, but same feeling.
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
is one of the most difficult deck to play right now...
big druid is the easiest deck to play
Correct-o-mundo. Raza priest is extremely skill intensive. Any deck that's not a curve deck requires serious decision making every turn. And when you can have a high wnrate even when not drawing Raza anduin that takes skill
Because it's unfun to play against a board clear after board clear, with Raza coming in making the hero power cost 0 mana and then Dknduin coming in and beating you down worst then Hunters do. also removing your big minions. All this while they draw, heal and go face. Priest can punish you for ANY play you make. A deck that has the answers to EVERYTHING is OP and should not exist. Even T1 decks need to have weakness. Priest doesn't have one, except fatigue, which is hardly relevant.
It's not interactive. Minion vs. Minion games have trading. One of the biggest reason why Arena is so much fun even though it ins't gold all the time.
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
THIS, ALL DAY THIS!!!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Priest now have a miserable winrate if you compare with rogues, warlocks , druids, shamans. for now is a tier 3 deck... What is the point of complain about this? until pirate warrior have better winrate
People are complaining because Razakus Priest requires very little skill to play and matches are almost always determined by whether or not you draw Raza and the DK early.
On the third day before Witchwood, Blizzard gave to me,
three Handlock decks,
two Molten Giants
and a winstreak to Legend Rank #3
Disclaimer: This is a fictional poem and this didn't actually happen to me.
It has really good winrate against every deck? Hmm? Maybe?
I have taken Priest to rank 5 three months in a row during the first ten days of each month. I do not write this to brag in ANY way. But how did you manage to get a ‘miserable winrate’?
The most popular decks for Highlander, Dragon and Big Priest all have positive winrates in the past 30 days. What are you on about? Priest is far better than both Warlock and Shaman right now, Tempo Rogue and Jade Druid are the only other truly competitive decks.
I'm pretty sure this thread exists already, the answers you seek are probably there.
I find Priest to be very not fun to play against. It takes little skill to win with. It takes equally little skill to beat it. With some deck styles you can play smartly and play around things but with priest, it's got a Quest Rogue feel to it. Pretty non-interactive. They just keep clearing the board until they can play their win condition. There's no real set up for it. Draw Raza. Draw Kaza. Win or not.
I'd rather play weird decks that require more thought and skill. Not that I'm a skilled player - far from it. My best rank ever was rank 10, I rarely advance past 15. I don't even try to. But I get more fun out of losing games where I had to think a lot than I do out of crap like Aggro Druid.
I'm the same way with other games. I play a lot of Civ 6. I'm not particularly good at it, but I enjoy the intellectual challenge of it. Same with Hearthstone. Decks that make it hard to enjoy the game are frustrating. Razakas priest is one of those. Frankly, so is Big Priest. Mostly just a matter of getting the right draws at the right time. Very hard to beat if not. That's just not fun. Not fun to play the deck, not fun to play against the deck.
μολὼν λαβέ
Many reasons.
1. People don't care about statistics, like the vS data reaper which shows through algorithms that Razakus is worse than Paladin, Warlock, Druid, Rogue and Shaman. They just wanna jump on the streamer whining bandwagon.
2. People overreact to new cards shown. They see psychic scream and think they instantly know how it will affect the meta, and already are certain it will make Priest so dominant no deck can compete. This is reasonable, however, because the community has never been wrong about a card that should destroy the meta. I mean come on, when was the last time you played ladder without queuing into those meta destroying Marsh Queen hunters?
3. Losing to Priest is apparently "unfun". Apparently, there are people who have the time of their lives losing to other decks.
The reason is that both against Big Priest and Razakus, if you lose, it is after you have played much more intensively on Tempo than they do, crucially because they tend to ignore the board for many turns.
And then suddenly beaten down to death, with few humongous cards or summons.
It does not always happen. But when you lose like that, it feels like being beaten down by a very lazy and lucky playstyle, even if it isn't.
It is the same kind of feeling you get against Exodia Mage and Jade/Ramp Druid.
Pre-nerf Quest Rogue was the epitome of this. Much more painful, but same feeling.
Because whining about priest is meta.
Because it's unfun to play against a board clear after board clear, with Raza coming in making the hero power cost 0 mana and then Dknduin coming in and beating you down worst then Hunters do. also removing your big minions. All this while they draw, heal and go face. Priest can punish you for ANY play you make. A deck that has the answers to EVERYTHING is OP and should not exist. Even T1 decks need to have weakness. Priest doesn't have one, except fatigue, which is hardly relevant.
It's not interactive. Minion vs. Minion games have trading. One of the biggest reason why Arena is so much fun even though it ins't gold all the time.
Because we people are stupid.