Deck is irrelevant, it's a straight up RNG prayer.
- DanielZur
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years, 9 months, and 17 days
Last active Fri, Aug, 7 2020 04:11:05 -
- 1
- 11
- 27
- 1 Follower
- 67 Total Posts
- 75 Thanks
-
3
LarryB324 posted a message on Illidan Stormrage ChallengePosted in: Illidan Stormrage Challenge -
5
ManThighs posted a message on [66% WR] Quest Hadronox DruidPosted in: [66% WR] Quest Hadronox DruidI changed King Mukla for Flobbidinous Floop. Don't have Mukla and this gives me a second Hadronox.
Only problem anti synergy with recruit, which delays your quest.
-
2
SnXTiF posted a message on A Special Year of the Mammoth Pack is Coming Soon - 30 Packs in One! 183000 Hearthstone Pack GiveawayPosted in: NewsDisagree.
We are so entitled that they should also give us Scarlett Johasson with the bundle.
Now, I'll be pleased as a loyal customer.
-
5
wattsimus posted a message on N'zoth Infinite DruidPosted in: N'zoth Infinite DruidWhy not add Arcane Tyrant ?They fit great when nourishing at turn 5!
-
45
deyhatin posted a message on N'zoth Infinite DruidPosted in: N'zoth Infinite Druidcredit card
-
53
Jzargos posted a message on Trump's Theorycraft - C'Thun DruidPosted in: Trump's Theorycraft - C'Thun Druidreplacement for cthun pls
-
8
user-24598937 posted a message on Trump's Theorycraft - C'Thun DruidPosted in: Trump's Theorycraft - C'Thun DruidI mentioned emperor being really bad in the deck a few pages back, but of course got downvoted because trump can't be wrong (trump sub myself btw). Mire Keeper I currently have as a one-of, but I'm not sure at all whether I want 1, 2 or none in the deck. It's very strong if you innervate it on 2, but ramp on turn 4 really isn't that strong. And yes, for this deck, I think there's too much ramp because the curve is low.
I run 1x Nourish currently and feel that it's just about right. If you're going to run 2x Beckoner of Evil (which I think are bad, period, especially in druid because you almost always want to ramp on 2) and 2x Twilight Elder, then obviously you don't have that much late game and you often need C'Thun to finish the game, you are going to need more card draw than this. Both because of the curve, but also because you need to draw in to C'Thun asap in the late game.
Living Roots, even though it's a really good card, I don't think really fits in this deck. If you're running Living Roots you either need to be up against a lot of 2 health minions (which is not the case right now on ladder) or you need to be running Savage Roar, which would never fit in a c'thun deck. At least i m o. In either case, running beckoner of evil and living roots is just not going to cut it, the curve will be too low.
While I'm at it, Crazed Worshipper is so much worse than Druid of the Claw that it boggles the mind how someone could even consider it in the deck. The extra buffs to c'thun are basically inconsequentional and you're giving up 1 attack and the versatility to charge a 4/4 instead? No, just no.
I'm playing Mulch currently in my deck, instead of BGH, and it has been performing really really well so far. I really recommend it over BGH.
-
3
user-23698347 posted a message on Raptor Zoo [Outdated]Posted in: Raptor Zoo [Outdated]Maybe this deck needs owl or sap? Doesnt do well with taunts
-
1
NoAnimalSuffering posted a message on [Legend] 80% Winrate Warrior Control with 1 DoomsayerPosted in: [Legend] 80% Winrate Warrior Control with 1 Doomsayer%80 winrate is a load of bullshit.This deck gets rekt by Patron Warrior,Secret Paladin,Combo Druid.And these 3 decks make the majority of rank 5-1.
First off, it is people like you who make this community so toxic, there is absolutely no reason to curse at the OP for trying to share his successful CW deck with the community. Now with that said, if you are losing to the three decks that you named using CW, than CW is probably not for you my friend, as those three decks you mentioned are easily the simplest decks to wreck with CW.Just keep grinding with this deck, get use to the few card changes that OP made i.e DS, Revenge and slam. After about about 40 games with this deck, you will steamroll those three above mentioned decks with ease. GL dude, and try to chill out man, srsly... -
5
Veneretio posted a message on Dark Jeweled Demon Zoo 1.2Posted in: Dark Jeweled Demon Zoo 1.2It's worse when Voidcaller dies and puts nothing into play...
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
2
So, here's my summary of my 8-3 run with this deck. I subbed one Lackey for a Portal, because more damage:
1. Priest [WIN] 1-0
2. Warrior [WIN] 2-0
3. Paladin [LOSS] 2-1
4. Hunter [WIN] 3-1
5. Druid [WIN] 4-1
6. Shaman [WIN] 5-1 (at this point I'm extremely impressed I have been paired with all different classes)
7. Warlock [WIN] 6-1 (beyond impressed, starting to wonder if it's on purpose)
8. Priest [WIN] 7-1 (the dream is dead)
9. Shaman [LOSS] 7-2
10. Warlock [WIN] 8-2
11. Hunter [LOSS] 8-3
2
This deck is one of the funniest I've ever played. Currently 9-1, but pretty sure it's only getting better.
Update: Final run was 12-4
-3
I just wanna point out that this deck runs 10 legendaries. I happen to have 7 out of those 10. This deck is what we'd call P2W for sure. With that said, I need subs for Mal'Ganis, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Krul the Unshackled, and they seem too powerful to sub appropriately.
1
Why run Spellbreaker when you can run Keeper of the Grove and it will, not only give you an alternative for removal, but also synergize with Fandral Staghelm?
I'd say I'm getting value out of that 4 mana at least 80% of the times.
2
Got it on 2nd try. Added two Abomination but ended up not using them for fear of killing my chances at combo. (3/1 Patrons are not great)
2
Is anyone willing to try out Forlorn Stalker in this deck and see if it pays off?
-6
1-5... So, I'm done with this deck.
1
I won on second try without even getting the Armor out. Just survived until he died by fatigue. RNG I guess...
4
Can somebody explain why I got two concedes in a row on Turn 2 using this deck? Is there something about it I'm not yet aware?
UPDATE: 3rd concede in a row. On Turn 5. What's going on? o.o
0
Because of the value of Doomhammer (4 face damage for 5 mana), I put a Fire Elemental in, (3 face damage for 6 mana and a 6/5 body). I feel like it's a good sub, but it remains to be tested.