Quote from Slage >>

Quote from Shipmen >>

Quote from BlueTwo >>

WAY more enjoyable than battlegrounds IMO. The limited pool kind of nudges new players out of highly competitive play I'd imagine, but overall the concept is great and I  think it'll be better moving forward. The lack of hero powers and treasures currently available definitely limit the potential. but it's only going to get better with the full release. 

 You can like or dislike battleground and it is fine. Especially now, battleground is quite unbalance due to elementals and many people can dislike it.

But battleground is a real new game mode. Battleground is a totally new game mode, it is not a dungeon run in pvp like Duels. Calling Duels a new game mode is an heavy word, it is a fake new game mode.

 This, This was the thing i was looking in the comments. Duel's is NOT a new game mode. Its just arena with a new dress. And thats the only reason why i am dissapointed with it

 Cool, you found ONE opinion to validate how you feel.

Quote from Nevermore00 >>

Quote from DSchu102285 >>

If you have to post multiple times on end that you aren’t “complaining” then guess what....

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” 

 Guess what?  That I'm wrong and I don't know what I was writing?  Or that one genius after another put words and tone in my mouth that I didn't say or have.  It's fair to say that tone is always the hardest part of writing something as without it people can misinterpret someone's words, but to continually say that you know how I feel about something because you yourself feel a certain way isn't very intelligent.  The hostility is just so wasteful.  But, even though I'm wasting my time replying to those that feel they have to attack an opinion, I guess it's helpful to me so next time I post something I can try to make my tone more clearly understood along with my words.  So, thank you.

 You play a slow & greedy control deck and then go on to state you sometimes feel envious of faster decks being able to meet their win condition. Perhaps you chose the wrong word? Envy means feeling of discontented or resentful.

So lets re-summarize this: You sometimes feel discontent because you lose games by not meeting your win condition soon enough. That is right there is complaining, there is no way around it. You aren't intelligent enough to comprehend what you wrote. And you won't receive any sympathy for playing Priest, this belongs in the salt thread.

Perhaps instead of calling me unintelligent you should refrain from complaining when your slow & greedy control deck "doesn't have a fast enough win condition." The very notion is moronic and that is why everyone is calling you a complainer.

If you have to post multiple times on end that you aren’t “complaining” then guess what....

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks.” 

AnQuote from Juturna >>

Title. They nerf mage (I understand) but then druid? Was Guardian Druid even considered a top tier 1 deck? 

 If you understood anything about game design you wouldn't be the author of this topic.

Before you say "nerf priest" asks yourself what class is the strong control package now? And if you remove a strong control deck which control deck will replace it?

Oh look, more or less the same decks from previous weeks....

I love how mods don't allow people to call each other retards without getting slapped on the wrist but allow that derogatory term to exist as acceptable deck name. I'm not opposed to the word retard just don't try to ban me when I use it to describe other people meanwhile letting it exist to some other degree in a different capacity. It just makes the mods looks like hypocritical, double standard d__che bags.

Secret Passage says hi

I got 9 Legendaries from 85 packs.

Star Student Stelina, Forest Warden Omu, Jandice Barov, Lord Barov, Ras Frostwhisper, High Abbess Alura, Disciplinarian Gandling, Archwitch Willow and Headmaster Kel'Thuzad.

With 56,575 dust and 12,610 gold I'll be in a good spot for the rest of the year. I mainly got the pre-order for the Hero Portrait and to open cards early.

Haters gonna hate which is why it sucks to suck.

IQ

Just a fun deck I'm playing around with that is a little better now that Dr. Boom is back to 7 mana cost.

Thx for selecting my deck, but it´s just a copy of Danehearth´s one. I just wanted to try some changes.

The credit is for Danehearth, it´s his deck

https://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/1376582-mozaki-update

Quote from alabataille >>

blz developers need to pass english test.. this wording is beyond comprehension..

"your next one.." NEXT ONE WHAT ???

 what are you, a spanish teacher? It obviously means the next spell damage minion

This is a depressingly ignorant response

I don't even know where to begin.  It is a list of excuses and rationalisations.  None of which would hold up to scrutiny.

I don't know why I have singled you out.  It was the first comment that I saw I suppose but I want to have a educative conversation with people and I read this stuff and it is assertions upon assertions.

It can easily be seen as inconsistent for blizzard to support BLM but kow to China, but it is important to remember that Blizzard are a capitalist organisation within a capitalist system that they have no interest in undermining.  But, then I think a strong argument against capitalism should be developed in response to the inconsistency, as many people are doing.  Many people, especially within the critical race theory movement, are arguing that racism is intimately tied to capitalism and to solve the former the latter must be dismantled.

So in response to your curious bullet pointed list. 1) why is that relevant? Partnerships and cooperatives are legitimate business models that are less aligned to a thoroughgoing captialism. 2) Noone either begins or ends with blizzard, it is a demand that should be made of all private business. 3) Noone either begins or ends with China, most countries across the world are controlled undemocratically by oppressive economic systems that must be dismantled. 4) Nonviolent strategies are proven to be both effective and efficient in overcoming oppression. Also, as an aside, this is an abhorrently ignorant thing to say. 5) What is the NSFW?  Why is it relevant?  That business operates largely outside of political pressure is arguably problematic and a weakening of any claim of democratic governance, because, let us not forget, our elected officials are not unresponsive to the demands of business - this creates a one directional relationship.

Forgive me for picking on you. I realise that you haven't intended to spell out a clear idea and you responding to a pretty naive comment because it is not in blizzards interests to challenge the authority of their business affiliates, but your comment was complete nonsense.

After i find the tree interesting, but i'm nt gonna pay for old expansion packs..

It is a Gryphon Rider's weapon. Hunters have other cards depicting Gryphons already. Gryphon Riders are typically Dawrves. Bran is a Dwarf and is a hunter.

Nope, still weird seeing a Hunter using a hammer.

Additional Note: Stormhammers are imbued with magic and lightning, once thrown it will come back to the wielder. Think Thor's hammer.

It's actually extremely Easy,either

learn to play your deck towards it's strength

Or

start playing any sort of deathrattle focused deck (e.g. quest pally)

CW Is really strong right now but it's archetype forces a lot of big weaknesses on It,if you can't play towards those you deserve to lose

To answer your question: you don't