Hearthpwn

Quote from Ludeus >>

Quote from Narwhalskol >>

People seem to be struggling with balancing these effects. most things are broken, or super broken

 If Dead Man's Hand was created as a custom card in this competion, people would have called it OP/ broken/ zomg infinite n'zoths or some other lines like that; with every new expansion the power level rises, it would be wise to keep up with the pace. 

That could be a fair argument to make, but not for some of the custom cards we've seen lol. There's good, and then there's game-breaking :/

I admit I have only gone through 5 pages, most of them seemed to be hellbent on balancing it according to 2014 power levels, can you show me an example of those game breaking cards?

Quote from Ludeus >>

That could be a fair argument to make, but not for some of the custom cards we've seen lol. There's good, and then there's game-breaking :/

I admit I have only gone through 5 pages, most of them seemed to be hellbent on balancing it according to 2014 power levels, can you show me an example of those game breaking cards?

Alright, just some finishing touches I need to figure out before submission. 

Should this be with Druid or Hunter? The theme of this card fits much better with Druid. (Big taunt and shuffle into deck effect. See Malorne and Recycle.) However, Hunter could really use some support for a control archetype, and Druid obviously is doing fine right now in that regard. (Forgot to put "beast" on the hunter one.)

Secondly, which text format looks better? Team5 has done cards both ways. Cornered Sentry has the "Taunt" on a line with the rest of the text, while Direhorn Hatchling gives its "Taunt" a line of it's own. 

Finally, which art fits better? If both of them suck please say so. 

Thougts about balance is also welcome. I feel like if this is given to Hunter, then the initial body could be a bit stronger because of the lack of card draw. 

Quote from Liam3Bucks >>

Alright, just some finishing touches I need to figure out before submission. 

Should this be with Druid or Hunter? The theme of this card fits much better with Druid. (Big taunt and shuffle into deck effect. See Malorne and Recycle.) However, Hunter could really use some support for a control archetype, and Druid obviously is doing fine right now in that regard. (Forgot to put "beast" on the hunter one.)

Secondly, which text format looks better? Team5 has done cards both ways. Cornered Sentry has the "Taunt" on a line with the rest of the text, while Direhorn Hatchling gives its "Taunt" a line of it's own. 

Finally, which art fits better? If both of them suck please say so. 

Thougts about balance is also welcome. I feel like if this is given to Hunter, then the initial body could be a bit stronger because of the lack of card draw. 

• I already weighed in and said Hunter, but they're both agreeable.
• I believe Direhorn Hatchling does that to avoid having a single word in the fourth row; it doesn't look good, when that happens. It's less about convention and more about cleanliness, you know? With that in mind, I'd say the Druid text-format looks better.
• Hunter art, definitely.

Quote from Lathy >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

@Lathy If you truly want to balance the card, the mana cost should be borderline-outrageous. I'm talking 8/9/10/11. No sarcasm intended; for the card to exist as-is, the cost needs to be prohibitive enough to justify decision-making. If it's cheap enough, why would you not run it, you know?

How about 7? That makes it un-comboable with Fandral unless you use innervate. I even doubt it would be playable at this cost, but I get why you call for the nerfbat even before it's posted ;)

Quote from Liam3Bucks >>

Alright, just some finishing touches I need to figure out before submission. 

Should this be with Druid or Hunter? The theme of this card fits much better with Druid. (Big taunt and shuffle into deck effect. See Malorne and Recycle.) However, Hunter could really use some support for a control archetype, and Druid obviously is doing fine right now in that regard. (Forgot to put "beast" on the hunter one.)

Secondly, which text format looks better? Team5 has done cards both ways. Cornered Sentry has the "Taunt" on a line with the rest of the text, while Direhorn Hatchling gives its "Taunt" a line of it's own. 

Finally, which art fits better? If both of them suck please say so. 

Thougts about balance is also welcome. I feel like if this is given to Hunter, then the initial body could be a bit stronger because of the lack of card draw.

Any improvements? Balancing?

Quote from Cogito_Ergo_Sum >>

Alright, here are my final drafts? Which one should I go with? Feedback will be returned!

---

Quote from Cogito_Ergo_Sum >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Is he supposed to be universal, though, giving the adjacent bonus to the opponent?

Oh yeah, he is XD. Forgot to put the "Your".

Arrrrgh! I'm getting mixed feedback. Some people like Tarot Cards, some people like A'dal, and some like Animus. WHAT DO I DO?!

---

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I already reviewed your Tribal card no?

Quote from ffinderous >>

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

 

Any improvements? Balancing?

 I guess...it's a little OP. There are so many Neutral minions could silence the token, and once the token is silenced, you got a permanently Immune with a minor cost. Even you could give the token to opponent by Treachery...Immature advice, hope it would help.

 

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

Quote from ffinderous >>

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

 

Any improvements? Balancing?

 I guess...it's a little OP. There are so many Neutral minions could silence the token, and once the token is silenced, you got a permanently Immune with a minor cost. Even you could give the token to opponent by Treachery...Immature advice, hope it would help.

 Stealth solves this. What I see is if it is buffed by an attack so it can remove its stealth then treachery etc. 

 

So i was thinking Stealth + Can't attack

This way there is no way someone can abuse it. Can't bounce, cant buff, cant treachery. 

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

Quote from ffinderous >>

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

 

Any improvements? Balancing?

 I guess...it's a little OP. There are so many Neutral minions could silence the token, and once the token is silenced, you got a permanently Immune with a minor cost. Even you could give the token to opponent by Treachery...Immature advice, hope it would help.

 Stealth solves this. What I see is if it is buffed by an attack so it can remove its stealth then treachery etc. 

 

So i was thinking Stealth + Can't attack

This way there is no way someone can abuse it. Can't bounce, cant buff, cant treachery. 

 Stealth keeps an enemy from messing with it, but that doesn't make it immune to you. ffinderous' worry is that you could just use someone like Spellbreaker to Silence the Unstable Heart and negate its text. You could coin him out the very-next turn, and counter the downside utterly. Same thing with Treachery; there's nothing stopping you from pushing it to the other side of the board and screwing the enemy.

You might be thinking of Elusive, or "Can't be targeted by spells or hero powers." Even then, that wouldn't prevent Spellbreaker/minion-abuse.

Quote from JuicyLemon >>

 What about summoning 2 Unstable heart with elusive+stealth?