yes, i think to some extent it would produce broken situations but at the same time I believe it would be slow and difficult to set up to those ends and would have several disrupting counter-plays apart from transformation/silence; Passing on its Deathrattle is stopped by having it the last minion destroyed, so a board clear + would solve it (yes, Ancestral Spirit effects could counter this to some extent too).
I think I'll go with it (below) as I'd like to play-test it and that's pretty much my philosophy for my WCC entries (as well as victory and world domination of course!! muhahah)
@Wailor; Hope is the best, great design and i could see it being made. On the cusp power level and could lose Rush and still be good in early game. In fact, I'd go Taunt instead tbh and still makes sense. It's so much tempo for little investment, almost guaranteed, it would feel unfair imo.
@Ffinderous; I like both - We need you pal has nice flavour and I could see it being played in certain decks (highlander/spell). The Magnetise - Adapt interaction on Golem of Theseus is great although I'd prefer to more clearly understand the reason why they interact (he's a mech i assume?). I dunno what sort of mutant mech/dinosaur would work, but I hope you get me :D. I'd prefer that Golem if it was nailed.
Necrotic Shot is a better version of Firelands Portal. You always get a 5/5 (which is nearly premium stats) *and* it has rush to clean up any damage you missed. Yeah, it can't go face, but I think this is way too good, even as a 7 mana 5/5 deal 5. Try 6 mana deal 4, summon a 4/4. That is more in line with Fire Elemental.
Mark of the Eredar is really neat. It is more of a gimmick than anything else, but is a creative idea.
Mark of the Gladiator... hmmm. Well, on paper, it's fine. Blessing of Might is 1 mana for +3, this is 2 mana for +4. Tempo Warrior isn't exactly a dominant force and warrior already has a 2 mana buff in Rampage. This, with Bloodsworn Mercenary, is just an overall increase of 2 damage. I think this is fine.
I'll go for Shaman on this one. So what do you guys think? Abou the Blessing of the elements, it's suposed to give each element-related buff.
So much nope of Blessing of the Elements. That's a huge buff on Bloodlust. If a minion has just 1 attack, it deals 3 extra damage, same as bloodlust. 2, it deals 4 extra damage, 1 over bloodlust.
Waterspeaker's is... a little low impact, I'd say. Also curious wording, is there any in-game card that says "give ____ effect"? Waterspeaker might be better if you summoned a random Basic Totem first.
Ideas for this week. Also ask for better arts, thank you.
Power Word: Barrier? Hm. I think it is way overcosted. The closest thing we have is Commanding Shout and that only saw play once in the meta solely for the card draw.
Blessing of Nordrassil, very nice, I like it.
Shadow Word: Target, heh, nice. This is very interesting with flamewaker.
I feel like this should be 1 mana, draw a card, have this effect. Furthermore, I'd limit it to discard a specific card, whether it is low-cost, high-cost, etc like you said in your write-up. I think you should have it discard the right-most card. I think this has potential, but as it stands, it will always be a net disadvantage for you.
Thank you! It seems your card has posted already, good luck!
2
Triple version:
0
Just one question, shall we need to make a triple version in addition?
2
3
0
Blue Aspects are Malygos andKalecgos
6
0
Thanks for your feedback! Good luck!
0
@Wailor @McF4rtson
Thanks for feedback! And sorry for some reason I can't see your card, do you mind if you post the text of the card that I could feedback?
Here's my cards with modification. Balanced?
2
Ideas for this week. Balanced?
4
Vicious Fledgling+Clingy Hatchling: 1mana 2/2 with "Stealth. 50% chance to attack a wrong hero."
Custom Beast:
0
Thanks for feedback! However, I'd like to confirm the rules of this week. Here are my summaries:
1. Submit a combined beast with a exist beast and a your custom beast, don't submit your custom one.
2. It must be a Hunter card since it combined by Deathstalker Rexxar.
3. And give it a particular name, not Zombeast.
4. Card with two complex effect is not fit the Zombeast rules, but add a simple keyword to it could make it reasonable.
So…… am I right?
0
Thanks for feedback! However, I'd like to confirm the rules of this week. Here are my summaries:
1. Submit a combined beast, not a custom one.
2. It must be a Hunter card since it combined by Deathstalker Raxxar.
3. And give it a particular name, not Zombeast.
4. Card with two complex effect is not fit the Zombeast rules, but add a simple keyword to it could make it reasonable.
So…… am I right?
0
Does this one count? Ask for better art, thank you.
Someone really loves Zombeast.Costom Beast:
Combined with Vicious Fledgling
0
Thank you! It seems your card has posted already, good luck!
2
Token:
Ironbark Protector