In Warcraft 3 and TFT, Banshee's has the ability to possess their victims, granting the owner permanent control of the target while destroying the banshee. Sylvanas Windrunner is the Banshee queen, and this is sort of a similar effect, just weaker even though the target can be decided if it happens to stay alive for more than one turn. Not sure if it's too strong?
EDIT: Also added an older card of mine, Shadow Hunter.
Couldn't help myself, already posted it (oops). Not sure if it needs a nerf? Unleash the Hounds in mind (and other stuff), but it opens up for a control use of those cards instead of aggro.
Does the card have to involve the +5 attack mechanic, or just a chicken-based card? Besides, it's really hard to find good art for chickens. Here are my ideas:
*Slaps roof of chicken* This bad boy can fit so many bombs in it.
If not, here's another idea with a bonus reference:
Edit: I just realised that Revenge Squad is a powercreep on Snake Trap. I suppose I could change it to something like "summon 3 angry chickens and attack it" to better represent the Cucco Angry Chicken Revenge Squad. Thoughts?
It never really makes sense to give a friendly minion rush on your opponents turn, or am I missing something?
Om my phone right now, so can't create the card. Will do when I get home:
Mother Hen Battlecry: Destroy an egg.
EDIT: Okay, came up with something slightly different to make it a bit more thematically fitting. Does it fit the rules (being a robo-chicken)? I'm aware Egg is not an actual race in hearthstone, nor is the definition of "hatch", but I think it's pretty obvious what the card does. I could write "destroy it" instead of "it hatches", but I believe it loses flavour. And 366 cause, well... 366 = EGG... sorry.
Three ideas. All build on the idea of passing a "curse" (vampire/werewolf) onto someone else.
I'm not sure which is better, if any are good at all, and I'm not sure if it's better with: "After this deals damage to a minion" or "After this attacks a minion"?
Lastly, I've worded it as "pass this effect onto it" instead of "give it this card text", as I feel it could be misunderstood in a way so ALL card texts would be passed onto the next target.
Can't recall. But I've seen another topic regarding this, which links to Peter Whalen posting it would cast the non-upgraded version of it. For now, you have to take my word for it ;)
16
2
In Warcraft 3 and TFT, Banshee's has the ability to possess their victims, granting the owner permanent control of the target while destroying the banshee. Sylvanas Windrunner is the Banshee queen, and this is sort of a similar effect, just weaker even though the target can be decided if it happens to stay alive for more than one turn. Not sure if it's too strong?
EDIT: Also added an older card of mine, Shadow Hunter.
0
Couldn't help myself, already posted it (oops). Not sure if it needs a nerf? Unleash the Hounds in mind (and other stuff), but it opens up for a control use of those cards instead of aggro.
67
4
0
It never really makes sense to give a friendly minion rush on your opponents turn, or am I missing something?
0
Om my phone right now, so can't create the card. Will do when I get home:
Mother Hen
Battlecry: Destroy an egg.
EDIT: Okay, came up with something slightly different to make it a bit more thematically fitting. Does it fit the rules (being a robo-chicken)? I'm aware Egg is not an actual race in hearthstone, nor is the definition of "hatch", but I think it's pretty obvious what the card does. I could write "destroy it" instead of "it hatches", but I believe it loses flavour. And 366 cause, well... 366 = EGG... sorry.
7
0
Why not both? Anyway, this card is pretty slow, and might be on the bad side, but it sure would be great in some sort of control-mage.
1
0
Three ideas. All build on the idea of passing a "curse" (vampire/werewolf) onto someone else.
I'm not sure which is better, if any are good at all, and I'm not sure if it's better with:
"After this deals damage to a minion" or "After this attacks a minion"?
Lastly, I've worded it as "pass this effect onto it" instead of "give it this card text", as I feel it could be misunderstood in a way so ALL card texts would be passed onto the next target.
0
Can't recall. But I've seen another topic regarding this, which links to Peter Whalen posting it would cast the non-upgraded version of it. For now, you have to take my word for it ;)
0
Short answer is no.
33
All who've played WoW know the "Bubble-Hearthstone"-Paladin.
0
Thank you for reminding me.