Ofc they will be Wild exclusive, why would they move them to Classic set? Makes zero sense. That would also kinda restrict their design space for the future ... rly, this is just a nonsense idea, sorry.
Agreed. If I had to chose one, I’d say DKs would be cool if bet stayed a bit longer, but I’m also OK with their rotation. The weapons are far less powerful overall, besides warlock’s, but the others are at an appropriate power level, and they can be soft silenced with weapon removal.
No more bloodreaver pls. Its a shame we need to sacrifice the 8 other hero cards to get rid of this guy.
And no more Jaina and Rexxar, so we are basically sacrificing 6 to get rid of 3.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
I hope not and it will not. Compare the difference of powerlevel from warlock and warrior. Warlock has the best weapon and best dk - warrior has the worst dk and one of the worst weapons. So no i'm actually glad when gul'dan will be wild exclusive...
I used to think like you, the mechanics of dk are incredible, but today I think we should have more possibilities, and I think it's possible, thanks to hagatha, we do not need death knights, we just need new heroes to change the heroic powerand let us use a new style of play with the class
No more bloodreaver pls. Its a shame we need to sacrifice the 8 other hero cards to get rid of this guy.
Their removal also will open up a lot of lategame possibilities for mage and hunter especially. Also, I have this guy crying in a corner of my collection:
I hope not and it will not. Compare the difference of powerlevel from warlock and warrior. Warlock has the best weapon and best dk - warrior has the worst dk and one of the worst weapons. So no i'm actually glad when gul'dan will be wild exclusive...
Guldan is only so strong because of op Demons like Voidlord. If Voidlord didnt exist Guldan wouldnt be op. 10mana class legendaries should be powerful
Sorry, Gul'Dan was amazing on zoo lists a while back. Guldan is just sick value.
You revive a lot of strong stuff, heal and get an amazing hero power after you've drawn your deck. You can play Gul'dan on any deck with a few demons. If you res doomguard and dreadlord you're good.
Guldan is only so strong because of op Demons like Voidlord. If Voidlord didnt exist Guldan wouldnt be op. 10mana class legendaries should be powerful
Actually, you are wrong. Gul'dan dk is strong himself without demons. When we (and proplayer) play Even Warlock, we basically use Gul'dan dk fast because it's hero power is basically the best hero power in the world. You resurrect 2 demon? k, doens't matter
do you guys think dks and weapons will be moved to the classic set at the next rotation or will be wild only?
Ofc they will be Wild exclusive, why would they move them to Classic set? Makes zero sense. That would also kinda restrict their design space for the future ... rly, this is just a nonsense idea, sorry.
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
Agreed. If I had to chose one, I’d say DKs would be cool if bet stayed a bit longer, but I’m also OK with their rotation. The weapons are far less powerful overall, besides warlock’s, but the others are at an appropriate power level, and they can be soft silenced with weapon removal.
Don't let the door hit you on your way out
Please, no. I think the game will actually become healthier without the DKs.
No more bloodreaver pls. Its a shame we need to sacrifice the 8 other hero cards to get rid of this guy.
And no more Jaina and Rexxar, so we are basically sacrificing 6 to get rid of 3.
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
I hope not and it will not. Compare the difference of powerlevel from warlock and warrior. Warlock has the best weapon and best dk - warrior has the worst dk and one of the worst weapons. So no i'm actually glad when gul'dan will be wild exclusive...
I used to think like you, the mechanics of dk are incredible, but today I think we should have more possibilities, and I think it's possible, thanks to hagatha, we do not need death knights, we just need new heroes to change the heroic power and let us use a new style of play with the class
Their removal also will open up a lot of lategame possibilities for mage and hunter especially. Also, I have this guy crying in a corner of my collection:
Editor of the Heartpwn Legendary Crafting Guide:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/205920-legendary-tier-list-crafting-guide
Don't worry. They'll definitely create a new a new hero card for you to hate.
Sorry, Gul'Dan was amazing on zoo lists a while back. Guldan is just sick value.
You revive a lot of strong stuff, heal and get an amazing hero power after you've drawn your deck. You can play Gul'dan on any deck with a few demons. If you res doomguard and dreadlord you're good.
Actually, you are wrong.
Gul'dan dk is strong himself without demons. When we (and proplayer) play Even Warlock, we basically use Gul'dan dk fast because it's hero power is basically the best hero power in the world. You resurrect 2 demon? k, doens't matter
Leper Gnome