Hearthpwn

Quote from szabozalan jump

The funny thing is, everyone is excited about the legendaries.

Because it is about crafting and you usually don't get the legendaries you want in contrast to commons and rares.

Whatever kills this card, the 3 Arcane Missiles together with 2 Flamewaker will avenge Rhonin ;)

I can already see the trolden video where a priest steals this card and plays it with Auchenai Soulpriest + Prophet Velen and wins the joust.

Quote from neepa jump

Quote from DynamischerDiskord jump

"LET THE LEGENDS FIGHT" 

Each player has to include 26 legendaries in his deck or as many legendary as possible 

The problem is that not all players has 26 legendaries to fit in.  Not many actually.  The entry barrier to tavern brawl is to have a hero at level 20; You should be able to play "constructed" tavern brawl with only your basic cards.  As many legendaries as possible will be wildly unbalanced depending on what legendaries you have, and how much.  But it's simple to fix the idea here:

Let the legends fight (by DynamischerDiskord)

Pick a hero.  Fight with a deck made of 6 random spells from that hero's class and of 24 random legendaries.

No, please not. Then we have a RNG based and those usually have so less synergies. My idea is an attempt to break out of the either constructed and everyone is net decking or RNG based without synergies brawls. And it would include a personal touch. It would be unbalanced since people with just a few legendaries could build standard decks and just include the few legendaries and they have an advantage in comparison to older players with lots of legendaries. However, the variety of decks is Hugh and you don't play always against "bad match ups". Of course with certain decks you don't have the chance to have a really high winrate. But that is not the point from the brawl. I just like the idea that everyone picks his own legendaries, where he is proud of, and built a deck around them. And then you compare your own personal deck with others. That older players have a disadvantage is something I consider as challenging for them and I personally wouldn't mind if I lose against someone with just a few legendaries, since I grant them there success. So even though it is unbalanced I think it is worth a try and it would be a nice change to the other brawls.

Actually this card has the potential to create insane tempo. If you can coin it turn 1 you can coin si7 or hp + deadly poison next turn. The problem is that it won't be always like that and then it is not clear how good it is.

Viable or not is not easy to assess atm. However, it has some potential and gives some new, unique options. Therefore I like the card.

Who thought back in the beginning of HS that these little dudes become so important :)

If you have to choose between two cars you take different criteria in consideration  (price, max speed, fuel consumption etc). Even if  a car seems obviously "better" than the other car it is only strictly better if it is better in every single criteria. That is what strictly expresses.  So if you compare two cards than strictly better means always better, in every situation. And that is simply not the case. I think the people use the word "strictly" too careless, because so far I haven't found two cards in hearthstone where one card is strictly better than the other one. Dr. Boom for example is way better than Wargolem, but it is not strictly better since it is weaker to MCT or the doggies. However, as I mentioned before,  I totally agree that Polymorph is better. 

Quote from manhack jump

Quote from DynamischerDiskord jump

There are no win strikes from rank 5 on anymore. So >50% win rate is necessary.

Technically there is a mathematical model called Random Walk that shows that at %50 or less overall win rate you could have random win streaks from 5 - Legend. Of course hitting these streaks, could take thousands of games.

There is another good reddit post HERE that outlines the statistics behind hitting legend. If you notice at %50 win rate you could hit legend with 144 - 1912 games with a median of 552 games played.

There are not a lot of people who have the time to play that many games, but the whole point, for me and to give those who enter this thread some hope is that almost anyone can hit legend given enough grinding.

Of course, it is more likely that improving your win rate to at least 55% is the best way to make getting a legend a reasonable goal. A higher win rate allows someone who is just playing a couple hours a day or on the weekends a really good 

Yeah that's true. But i had the win rate over the period of your games from rank 5 to legend  in mind. If you hit legend your win rate was higher than 50 %  ;)

I don't know, i have strongly mixed feelings about that card. I thought Nefarian was a nice idea and with this card there is further potential to get some crazy card combos. However, those cards increase the RNG and i think they shouldn't exaggerate it with those cards.  

Never liked Kezan in any Warlock list. They only deck I every played it in was tempo Mage and that was in a meta where literally every Druid played a copy and I had to steal my secrets back. If you really want to play it, I'd recommend replacing MCT, Defenders are too valuable to protect yourself against combos.

Nice deck and guide - will try to rework deck of mine which was similar but without good results on current meta.

And hey, Mac user here too ;)

Out of curiosity, what amount of games would you play with someone else's deck to determine viability? Myself i would play around 25 games if i was playing someone else's deck. For my own decks, that evolve constantly with games played, i generally use around 50 to see if its worth keeping in my permanent roster and tweaking. After that, i tweak each new version through the season.

This deck I believe is a very cool concept and I think that alot of the people who are claiming that they are loosing many matches with this deck could play it in a different style to have greater win rates. The goal is obviously board control (Sticky Shaman) that alot of these cards are very annoying to deal with and if you dont the damage adds up rather quickly. The spell removals and buffs get rid of their cards attempting to regain board control, and often in matchups (Depending on your luck of the draw ofc) such as Mage,Rouge, Hunter, they have to waste alot of their burst in attempting to remove your board. I must say though that it is a aggro/midrange/burst , its weird. Id definetly trade out the Dr. Balanced for Neptulon, it fits the deck well and generally is the final push 7/7 with 4 card gain (That you need from burning in the mid game). Great Deck !

Edit- Also changed out the 2nd Azure Drake for a ooze, Helps vs rogue,hunter,paladin, and the Warrior matchup (Mirror matchup too lol !! ^^)

From the cool little paper writ that one guy got, i would honestly say its going to be a tournament mode with no extra cards. I just don't see it being an adventure and BRM is too close behind us for any new content.

However, id love a expansion but then... Blizzcon will be pretty ZZZZZ at the Hstone booth. 

Do what you want, this is just my list that I used to get legend 2 seasons in a row consistantly. I don't know about you, but I've been able to make game winning powerplays with this deck and i find it extremely consistant, which is why I believe I was able to achieve legend. This is the only deck I play. I have tested many other builds, but this is only build for me. I'm truly sorry if it's not working for you, that's very unfortunate. I am not planning to change anything because everything is necessary for me in this deck. You can try velen/Tharissan if you want, and if it works, then that's great. Personally, those two changes have no place in my deck otherwise I would have already done so. You say that blingtron is too much RNG, but this whole game is RNG... What if you get a gorehowl and he gets a light justice and then you Harrison Jones? DId you ever think of that sir? if you want to netdeck, go ahead, that's fine because I put out this list to show some fellow Hearthstone players. HOWEVER, if you want to complain about my list, then go make your own deck and voice your opinion there, because I don't think this is the right place. Hope this helps.

#*($)# those other things:

Troggzor.  Apprentice did a lot of work.  Egg was nice though died easily to certain bananas.  

Trog, though.  Never have I had one card win more games ALL by himself.  People had not one clue what to do around him, so they did their normal banana pump with flamewakers and what not only to face an entire board full of buffed Trogs.  Then they conceded.  It was honestly Drop Trog and Win.

Honorable mention: Patron.  No need for charge.  Just throw some bananas at him, preferabily after your opponent had used removal since they think they can win with flamewaker spam.  

I stopped playing mage after the first day, and I'm sincerely going to miss this brawl.  

ahaha :D

so nice :)

1st time concede because kel was in my hand.

2nd try win xD

Really? I faced aggro pallys, murlocs, and many more classes and interesting decks

Quote from DynamischerDiskord jump

Quote from LovelyBeginner jump

Quote from DynamischerDiskord jump

Quote from LovelyBeginner jump

Quote from ponk87 jump

Lol so what most people in Europe speak between 3-4 languages at least the younger generation sorry dude you ain't that special. And the art you create for souvenir shops mostly ends up in the trash bin after a year or two.

 The art i create is available in the libraries.

 I don't want to belittle it, just curious: What exactly are you doing?

 Im writing. Already published two books and working on third now. But its not in english.

 I got that ;) What kind of? Novels? Scientific books?

Novels. They have solid success in my country but I still feel more likely like a beginning writer.

Im also very often listening to audiobooks while im playing HS so im also "slightly working" when i play so its not just a wasted time for me :-)