Hearthpwn

I am aware of that and i was considering it as well. As a mathematicion i have a good understanding of statistics and i know that you can be tricked by that really easy and that you often have to consider other circumstanzes, too. However, with KT i am pretty sure it was always like that. That doesnt mean that it is not randomly, even though it is pretty unlike that this happens. I know that, but it made me thinking. Maybe i will make a test one day, when i have plenty of time ^^ 

And even when it uses RNG, it doesn't mean that it is really randomly. The numbers are always depending on something, like time for example, and depending on your RNG you can get good or bad random numbers.

i think i found a pretty good warrior deck to beat the herioc Sapphiron. Target is to let him die of fatigue. I tried it several times and it worked out i 70% of the cases.

You can find the deck here:
http://www.hearthpwn.com/decks/95686-anti-heroic-sapphiron

And a let's play here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiQPCSk_ahk

Quote from romanzpuszczy »

Wisp - it can kill stuff.

 

I don't know when and how, maybe if you cast five wisps with druid's 6 mana spell and one of two will manage to survive. Target Dummy can get buff from Iron Sensei or Screwjank Clunker in the same turn they're placed, kill stuff and survive with taunt. Plus synergy with a lot other class and neutral cards (Goblin Blastmage, Tinkertown Technician for example) That's a lot more than "wisp can kill stuff".

Thats like saying a Paladin/Mage/Rogue/Druid hero's power is not worth using. One damage is one damage and it helps in a lot of situations. As for combo buffs Hobgoblin can buff it to a 3/3. Less synergy but on a whole... much more useful.

Just a counter argument =)

I love hearing all the Kel'thuzad reanimate eachother like the booming voice of Hades.

Worked perfect! First try i win, thanks.

THAT WAS BRILLIANT!! I got it on the first or second try (truth be told, after so many tries and decks, I didn't keep count...) 

And what's more, I had NONE OF THE EXPERT CARDS NEEDED, not even the uncommon ones, let alone epics... Was using the Naxx ones of course, like Nerubian Egg and Death's bite, but had no Gorehowl, inner rages or Shieldslam, nor the Arcane Golem.

The key to it is the approach, cheers to the OP! Being on the defensive, killing minions and dealing little face damage (unless, for example, wanting to trigger Death's Bite without getting hit, like happened to me). Goes without saying that you always have to consider using your hero power, cause every time you don't is a lost chance. 

If you don't have any of the expert cards, I personally threw in the Bluegill Warrior and, since I had them, two Explosive Sheeps and two Southsea Deckhands. What I mean to say with all this, is that it's possible to win with a very BASIC DECK, even if it is probably more difficult and I had a bit of luck. Still, 160 dust total if you wanted to craft these cheaply. Personally, I think the inner rage is less versatile than these, and by the time you need it (+Kor'kron Elite to hit a Spectral Knight or Necroknight) you probably don't have the need for the 0 mana cost.

Quote from DynamischerDiskord »

Ok, i try to explain it again. I am not really familiar how it works with online games. What part is calculated on a server and what part on the computer. I have no idea about such details.

In online games in general, everything possible is calculated on the server side.

Note that "everything possible" does not mean "everything", and this does lead to cheats.

In particular, in real-time games like shooters and MMOs, the client will have more information than it strictly needs, and the client will be trusted - to an extent - to tell the server what movements you performed. This is all in order to ensure that gameplay proceeds smoothly even when there are intermittent minor network interruptions - e.g. packet loss causing resends. 

However, for a non-real-time game like a card game, there is no reason why the client would be trusted with any extra information at all. There is no reason why your client would know for instance what cards your opponent has in his hand. No reason why your client would be entrusted with shuffling or drawing cards. No reason why your client would be trusted with random number generation. All of that stuff would be handled server-side. 

For that reason, I woulod be extremely dubious about any claims of odd behaviour caused by client computer differences, or hacks, or suchlike.

The random numbers are determined server-side, not client-side, so one computer won't be more random than another.