EDIT Okay fine maybe its not shaman i was just looking at the vote and saw the majority picking shaman anyhow Realistically the worst one would be Hunter,Because you not only have the base your deck on a single card you also get card that is pure rng so it could just plain terrible card
At least the shaman weapon is playable the hunter weapon litterly will do nothing most games unless it becomes a control match and you run it for when your out of minions its crap. Its a 4/2 weapon for 7.
Definitely Mage Imo, the only scenario it's good is in an aggro mage list that caps out at this card that finishes with burn spells, otherwise you're just gonna mill. Can't be run in freeze or quest, possibly in tempo but it's a very low tempo card. If aggro burn mage becomes a thing this will be good, but I can't see it happening.
Definitely Mage Imo, the only scenario it's good is in an aggro mage list that caps out at this card that finishes with burn spells, otherwise you're just gonna mill. Can't be run in freeze or quest, possibly in tempo but it's a very low tempo card. If aggro burn mage becomes a thing this will be good, but I can't see it happening.
I don't know if I agree with this quite yet. It is possible that there is a secret / tempo / aggro shell with Aluneth in Wild that runs the 6 dead cards you need for Exodia. You repeatedly vomit your hand on to the board, using your minions for board control and draw into Exodia. Maybe.
I guess you can can actually try Woecleaver in meme(or not) Big warrior deck (probably meme). Also yooouuuu caaaan try Rhok'delar in the meme no minions deck, or in Y'sharaj Hunter deck wich saw a little bit of play not that long ago.
But The Runespear you won't put in any your deck cause its just too random. I mean you immidiately play some spells that might be garbage in some situations. dissapointment.
I'd have to say Hunter, because it ONLY fits into a poorly supported, low-power archetype. With other weapons, they can at least be played in multiple scenarios.
Shaman probably, with Warrior and Hunter you could get use out of them depending on how you build your deck. Runespear could lead to a lot of frustation.
Mage can just replace the weapon with Medivh. Quite a few burn lists already included Atiesh. It's unlikely you'll burn too many cards. It's not as bad as it seems at first.
Until Karazhan rotates out...
I thought about that, but they are both legendary cards. You can't count on having both in your hand, and it's game losing if you're milling yourself and you mill Medivh. Plus Medivh is a pretty good card by itself. You're pretty likely to play it before the weapon if you find it first, and then the weapon is almost a dead draw.
One other quick point I just thought of. You run cards like Firelands and Flamestrike in a deck with Medivh, but they are much too highly costed to go in a deck with the weapon. You're cutting you're Medivh value to 4 or maybe 5 mana cards to run your 1 weapon, which you can't even rely on finding every game.
Now that all the weapons got revealed
Lul Shaman
EDIT Okay fine maybe its not shaman i was just looking at the vote and saw the majority picking shaman anyhow Realistically the worst one would be Hunter,Because you not only have the base your deck on a single card you also get card that is pure rng so it could just plain terrible card
I think hunter, the setup is too much for a class really don't have healing to survive for a value game and the hero power don't help...
Hunter one will end up being good one day. Shaman one will always suck.
Hunter.
Say what you want about The Runespear (it's terrible), but it gives you options.
The Hunter nonsense pigeonholes you into an absurd deck with no win condition.
All in all though I'd actually say nearly every weapon was highly disappointing, especially following up how fun Death Knights were.
Definitely Mage Imo, the only scenario it's good is in an aggro mage list that caps out at this card that finishes with burn spells, otherwise you're just gonna mill. Can't be run in freeze or quest, possibly in tempo but it's a very low tempo card. If aggro burn mage becomes a thing this will be good, but I can't see it happening.
[url=http://signaturecraft.us/][img]http://signaturecraft.us/signatures/eJxzyyxKVUgqLcorVkgqykzPKFHIzFMoyUhVSEksyubyLIHKpZal5kEVpBYplGekghUVpRYrJCoUF4CUBmTkp-ZlVphbGnO556co-KcphCcWcbkApRR0FZyA6n1Ti5IzUnO4jExN4dgQABU6KQY~.png[/img][/url]
The Hunter weapon has a really nice effect it's to bad the restriction kills it but expect it to be great if minionless hunter is ever good
The Runespear is too random. Most likely you will laught when your opponent plays this card. kappa
And yeah this weapon was a big dissapountment for me as a control shaman fan.
Warlock, does nothing. You have better, more consistent ways of cheating your summons in.
I guess you can can actually try Woecleaver in meme(or not) Big warrior deck (probably meme). Also yooouuuu caaaan try Rhok'delar in the meme no minions deck, or in Y'sharaj Hunter deck wich saw a little bit of play not that long ago.
But The Runespear you won't put in any your deck cause its just too random. I mean you immidiately play some spells that might be garbage in some situations. dissapointment.
warlock cause at least warriors can do something on a swing instead of you sitting there hoping they dont slime ya. warrior VERY close second tho.
Hi i'm Tyler and I play hearthstone and watch anime.
Sometimes i make cards. I'd like to do that for a career one day if ever possible.
Woecleaver seems to be the least efficient even when you can get it working
I'd have to say Hunter, because it ONLY fits into a poorly supported, low-power archetype. With other weapons, they can at least be played in multiple scenarios.
Shaman probably, with Warrior and Hunter you could get use out of them depending on how you build your deck. Runespear could lead to a lot of frustation.
The Runespear, easy.There is no saving for that shit.
shaman
hunter's, while bad is still playable if you make a low tier deck for it.
Warrior might see play? But I highly doubt it
Bakunter for next meta
[url=http://signaturecraft.us/][img]http://signaturecraft.us/signatures/eJxzyyxKVUgqLcorVkgqykzPKFHIzFMoyUhVSEksyubyLIHKpZal5kEVpBYplGekghUVpRYrJCoUF4CUBmTkp-ZlVphbGnO556co-KcphCcWcbkApRR0FZyA6n1Ti5IzUnO4jExN4dgQABU6KQY~.png[/img][/url]