the last 7 zoo decks ive played havent even bothered with my 3-4 minions on board. i've still won 3 of the games, but if you just wanna play mindless face decks, wouldnt shaman be better?
It goes for the board, but remember zoo is an aggro deck.
Except just like Mech Mage, if they run out of a board, they're out of the game, so ffering ludicrously good trades to your opponent is a really bad move.
I mean going face is sometimes the right move but being one removal or AOE away from having your board wiped for a handful of mana is a risk they can't afford.
Aggro zoo is just a better deck right now, but it's far from being a face deck. You simply start pushing damage in earlier than regular(doomguard) zoo, but you still want to focus on fighting for the board in the early game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
the last 7 zoo decks ive played havent even bothered with my 3-4 minions on board. i've still won 3 of the games, but if you just wanna play mindless face decks, wouldnt shaman be better?
It's still a board centric deck.. It's just that the people you played against play zoo only cause it the fotm.
It's smorc vs control. It's still board control vs aggro/tempo.
Zoo is much better going for control. The people you played were playing badly. There's your answer.
It goes for the board, but remember zoo is an aggro deck.
Aggro zoo is just a better deck right now, but it's far from being a face deck. You simply start pushing damage in earlier than regular(doomguard) zoo, but you still want to focus on fighting for the board in the early game.