not quite convinced. It basically is a slightly better whirlwind, but your minions have less synergies (better in the way that you could ddeal the final damage to your opponent and trigger all the self-damage). Seing as how there wa sthat Warlock Dragon, which summoned stuff when you were dealt damage ... Still, not quite convinced just yet
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Don't be so melodramatic there's only two typos. Will = with, poeple = people.
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Don't be so melodramatic there's only two typos. Will = with, poeple = people.
And "sleeping in this card" means what exactly? :)
There's the phrase "sleep on x", but even that wouldn't apply here.
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Don't be so melodramatic there's only two typos. Will = with, poeple = people.
And "sleeping in this card" means what exactly? :)
There's the phrase "sleep on x", but even that wouldn't apply here.
Sleep on. It's a piece of vernacular that means to underrate or ignore, which is primarily used for things like T/CCGs. Presumably derived from describing a card as a sleeper.
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Don't be so melodramatic there's only two typos. Will = with, poeple = people.
And "sleeping in this card" means what exactly? :)
There's the phrase "sleep on x", but even that wouldn't apply here.
Sleep on. It's a piece of vernacular that means to underrate or ignore, which is primarily used for things like T/CCGs. Presumably derived from describing a card as a sleeper.
I know about "sleeper cards", but that wouldn't a sleeper card typically have hidden benefits, or, as you say, be underrated because no obvious use/strength is visible? You don't just list all the benefits (as he did) and folow it up with "it's a sleeper card". But ok, that would just be a small stylistic issue, and I might be completely off on that.
The connection I'm missing is going from "it's a sleeper card" (probably what he meant to say) to "people will sleep on this card". These two don't mean the same, at all. Or do they? (not a native English speaker btw, wondering if I am way off here)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Discuss!
Learn More About Descent of Dragons
Looking to learn more about Hearthstone's newest expansion? Visit our dedicated expansion guide.
.
not quite convinced. It basically is a slightly better whirlwind, but your minions have less synergies (better in the way that you could ddeal the final damage to your opponent and trigger all the self-damage). Seing as how there wa sthat Warlock Dragon, which summoned stuff when you were dealt damage ... Still, not quite convinced just yet
Whirlwind that hits face and has synergy will all the self damage cards in warlock?
Poeple will sleep in this card.
If you are playing Dark Skies with spell damage minions you might want to consider this card. But Im not sure it will make the cut.
The self-damaging aspect of this card makes it attractive in decks that want that I think.
That's actually what makes me think it could see play. Especially in Wild with the spellstone.
Lil Hellfire :3
Would like to say Rain of Dust, but you'll only get 5...
I have studied the English language for many years. Yet, even after reading your post multiple times over, I still am unable to decipher what you were trying to say.
Don't be so melodramatic there's only two typos. Will = with, poeple = people.
Is smol hellfire needed? If some self-damage lists can exist maybe, but this seems too tempo-lossy
And "sleeping in this card" means what exactly? :)
There's the phrase "sleep on x", but even that wouldn't apply here.
Sleep on. It's a piece of vernacular that means to underrate or ignore, which is primarily used for things like T/CCGs. Presumably derived from describing a card as a sleeper.
I know about "sleeper cards", but that wouldn't a sleeper card typically have hidden benefits, or, as you say, be underrated because no obvious use/strength is visible?
You don't just list all the benefits (as he did) and folow it up with "it's a sleeper card".
But ok, that would just be a small stylistic issue, and I might be completely off on that.
The connection I'm missing is going from "it's a sleeper card" (probably what he meant to say) to "people will sleep on this card". These two don't mean the same, at all. Or do they? (not a native English speaker btw, wondering if I am way off here)