cards like the new brann are the reason why i don't feel bad killing people on turn 5 with treant druid.
horrible card design that perfectly shows off that the hearthstone devs don't know what they're doing. the reno hero card wasn't stupid enough so they did this.
cards like the new brann are the reason why i don't feel bad killing people on turn 5 with treant druid.
horrible card design that perfectly shows off that the hearthstone devs don't know what they're doing. the reno hero card wasn't stupid enough so they did this.
the Reno card is boring but the only way to deal with the overpowered cards these days, u don't draw Reno = gg
Yes Highlander warrior is way too strong but it relies on getting the Brann and Reno on curve. If they do its basically over as they will gain 10000000 armor and do 1000000 damage and there is nothing you can do about it. It is really brainless and is pushing other decks out. I think in Wild it would be okay. But in standard the new Brann is really dumb. If they dont do something about Brann and Reno thats gonna be the whole format. That is already almost everyone I play except Paladin. If you are lucky you might play against someone playing the 40 card version and that makes it much worse. Problem is if they get the Reno cards on curve you are screwed despite their terrible deck.
Brann is atrociously designed as its draw it on curve win dont probably lose. I am going back to Wild its so bad...
Reno is also dumb. Its neutral? Who the hell thought that was smart? It should be a Rogue/Mage dual class card and probably remove both players stuff. As it is its too good not to use. I put it in non Warrior decks and it definitely wins almost every time you play it.
If they nerf annoying decks, the ultimate anti fun deck might emerge, called control priest with a new flavor: shadow word:steal. Warrior might be OP i I just dont want to see that card
Priest isnt that good. I have played against super greedy priests with my greedy meme deck and I beat them usually. Stealing feels bad but it has nowhere near the raw power of warrior.
HSReplay on Highlander Warrior is it has a winrate of 32.65% vs plague DK in 1032 games.
Maybe I'm haven't met the Proper Warriors yet, but understanding what decks counter each other will help you you get to Legend.
Also try these decks vs Highlander warrior. Treant druid, mining paladin, secret mage and sludge warlock.
You entirely missed the point. This isnt about countering to make Legend. Every decent player understands counter play. Just because warrior has a counter deck in plague DK does not excuse its rampant bs like a million Astalors, 1000 armor ez, Reno punishing you for developing....Plague DK sucks against most other decks. Treant Druid is good against everything lol...its too consistent. I doubt any good warrior player is threatened by Warlock. I have never even seen a Secret Mage in standard but perhaps with enough objections any deck will lose to it. Do not try to justify Blizzards poor design. Brann and Reno in their current forms are dumb. They would be fine in Wild but not standard where its too easy to insta win with Brann. Unless the warrior is dead the turn you get immediately after Brann comes down you are going to lose. Ive even seen warriors play like garbage and still get a free win bc Brann gives them infinite value, armor, and damage. Its so bad Wild feels more fair...
Shaman highlander was considered too good (not even OP) and it was nerfed in no time. Curious to see how long it’s going to take them to nerf warrior too. And yes paladin has number one priority anyway
Deck is mid. If you can pull Brann it can succeed, but it gets rolled by aggro and Plague.
Pally is stupid OP, but at this point is anyone left at Blizz that cares? Microsoft just gutted the company so probably few there left paying attention.
How did Brann dodge the nerfs again? I auto-concede as soon as it’s played, it’s pretty much a play to win card. It’s funny how Bran was removed before because doubling battle cries was unhealthy for a single turn and then they print it for the whole game. It’s like making a mistake and then making an even worse mistake doing the opposite of what you should’ve learned from your first mistake. Nevermind the fact that you won’t be facing any warrior without that card.
Warrior: Brann: concede
Warrior: Brann: concede
It makes me understand playing treant druid just a bit, if only out of complete helplessness. Haven’t reached that point yet.
I only beat some some of the time but once we are deep into the end game I'm done for. I did use Symphony of Sins to burn their Astalor and Reno and barely made it out with the W. I would suggest being as aggressive as possible, be smart and be patient. The deck is hard to beat for any non-aggro deck.
The meta is such a bore I’m hoping for the 10 year content to not be so stupid it’s fun for at least a month. Who needs mercs when BG’s has me at 300 on the reward track already. Another 200 free packs and the mega bundle will kick off the ten year hype for me , not to mention the 500+ packs I never needed to open. I might just open all 800+ packs and hit the dust all button for the 10 year mark. Over 250k dust and 800+ packs would make a funny video for sure.
if you have the cards for dragons in twist and have something else to do while you play curvestone D5 is pretty easy.
I don't think it's too unbalanced. Affter all is a 6 mana do nothing if you play it on curve, with awful stats for his cost, and if your opponent is putting some pressure on you playing him is not always a good idea. Not to mention how is easily counteted by DK and shaman with thr overload shuffle.
cards like the new brann are the reason why i don't feel bad killing people on turn 5 with treant druid.
horrible card design that perfectly shows off that the hearthstone devs don't know what they're doing. the reno hero card wasn't stupid enough so they did this.
the Reno card is boring but the only way to deal with the overpowered cards these days, u don't draw Reno = gg
Yes Highlander warrior is way too strong but it relies on getting the Brann and Reno on curve. If they do its basically over as they will gain 10000000 armor and do 1000000 damage and there is nothing you can do about it. It is really brainless and is pushing other decks out. I think in Wild it would be okay. But in standard the new Brann is really dumb. If they dont do something about Brann and Reno thats gonna be the whole format. That is already almost everyone I play except Paladin. If you are lucky you might play against someone playing the 40 card version and that makes it much worse. Problem is if they get the Reno cards on curve you are screwed despite their terrible deck.
Brann is atrociously designed as its draw it on curve win dont probably lose. I am going back to Wild its so bad...
Reno is also dumb. Its neutral? Who the hell thought that was smart? It should be a Rogue/Mage dual class card and probably remove both players stuff. As it is its too good not to use. I put it in non Warrior decks and it definitely wins almost every time you play it.
Priest isnt that good. I have played against super greedy priests with my greedy meme deck and I beat them usually. Stealing feels bad but it has nowhere near the raw power of warrior.
You entirely missed the point. This isnt about countering to make Legend. Every decent player understands counter play. Just because warrior has a counter deck in plague DK does not excuse its rampant bs like a million Astalors, 1000 armor ez, Reno punishing you for developing....Plague DK sucks against most other decks. Treant Druid is good against everything lol...its too consistent. I doubt any good warrior player is threatened by Warlock. I have never even seen a Secret Mage in standard but perhaps with enough objections any deck will lose to it. Do not try to justify Blizzards poor design. Brann and Reno in their current forms are dumb. They would be fine in Wild but not standard where its too easy to insta win with Brann. Unless the warrior is dead the turn you get immediately after Brann comes down you are going to lose. Ive even seen warriors play like garbage and still get a free win bc Brann gives them infinite value, armor, and damage. Its so bad Wild feels more fair...
Shaman highlander was considered too good (not even OP) and it was nerfed in no time. Curious to see how long it’s going to take them to nerf warrior too. And yes paladin has number one priority anyway
Months ago they said they want to give Paladin some new identity. It seems Paladin new identity is to be overpowered. Limited edition Windfury flavor
"Highlander Warrior" is a funny way to spell "Fatigue Druid"
Well, VS meta snapshot just dropped and, just as mentioned before, Highlander Warrior is just meh.
It might be played a lot (because it's fun), but it gets destroyed by more than Plague DK.
100% win rate against warriors of any kind with Banana Watch Post Mill Rogue
Deck is mid. If you can pull Brann it can succeed, but it gets rolled by aggro and Plague.
Pally is stupid OP, but at this point is anyone left at Blizz that cares? Microsoft just gutted the company so probably few there left paying attention.
How did Brann dodge the nerfs again? I auto-concede as soon as it’s played, it’s pretty much a play to win card. It’s funny how Bran was removed before because doubling battle cries was unhealthy for a single turn and then they print it for the whole game. It’s like making a mistake and then making an even worse mistake doing the opposite of what you should’ve learned from your first mistake. Nevermind the fact that you won’t be facing any warrior without that card.
Warrior: Brann: concede
Warrior: Brann: concede
It makes me understand playing treant druid just a bit, if only out of complete helplessness. Haven’t reached that point yet.
I only beat some some of the time but once we are deep into the end game I'm done for. I did use Symphony of Sins to burn their Astalor and Reno and barely made it out with the W. I would suggest being as aggressive as possible, be smart and be patient. The deck is hard to beat for any non-aggro deck.
I have not played a single human-controlled deck that ISN'T Highlander Brann so far this block.
EVERY. SINGLE. HUMAN. OPPONENT. HAS. BEEN. HIGHLANDER. BRANN.
I'm actually looking FORWARD to playing bots and ropers/afkers, for the variety, if nothing else.
I'm playing plague DK just bc of the massive presence of hl warrior on the ladder, since any other deck is pretty useless.
Can we nerf this disgusting retarded card already?
Ruining both standard and wild. WTF I hate Blizzard for doing this BS. WTF were they thinking?
The meta is such a bore I’m hoping for the 10 year content to not be so stupid it’s fun for at least a month. Who needs mercs when BG’s has me at 300 on the reward track already. Another 200 free packs and the mega bundle will kick off the ten year hype for me , not to mention the 500+ packs I never needed to open. I might just open all 800+ packs and hit the dust all button for the 10 year mark. Over 250k dust and 800+ packs would make a funny video for sure.
if you have the cards for dragons in twist and have something else to do while you play curvestone D5 is pretty easy.
Next month can’t come soon enough…..
inb4 ETC gets its answer. Laughs in Steamcleaner
I don't think it's too unbalanced. Affter all is a 6 mana do nothing if you play it on curve, with awful stats for his cost, and if your opponent is putting some pressure on you playing him is not always a good idea. Not to mention how is easily counteted by DK and shaman with thr overload shuffle.
So IMHO extremely powerful but not broken.
Ive been playing elemental mage with lightshow and plowing right through warriors