I play priest almost exclusively so quite naturally so I tend to despise rogues, to the point where I tech heavily against them. But nothing is worse than a bad mulli against aggro, regardless of class. Aggro/tempo warrior. Aggro druid. "Midrange" aggro/token shaman. Murloc aggro or midrange paladin. Secret/tempo mage. Quest rogue even feels like an aggro deck at times. Hyena hunter. If you biff your mulli against these decks it's pretty much over, often even if they draw worse than you do.
A shaman with god tier topdecks is also one of the most frustrating things I've encountered, even after they've lost trogg and totem golem. Sustain - check. Burst/reach - check. Board control/wipes - check. Tempo swings - check. Fits in one archetype? Check. Shaman is still one of the most versatile and punitively stupid classes to beat right now. It's honestly not that I've lost too much against them compared to other classes, I think, but that each fight seems so unnecessarily difficult and tedious. The salt floweth, but I care not. Fite me.
For me it is Rouge for sure . As main Paladin player ( not secretpally) , Rouge is one of the toughest decks to beat. When Auctioneer was five mana and Leeroy four ,it was a auto loss back then. Against Questrouge it's not much easyier .
I mostly play as priest and I have problems against Rouge the most often. It is probably the class that I lose to the most and then in second place would be Warrior because you know...pirate warrior.
Then you probably need to learn to play more for control / value, the weaknesses of the hunter class. Obviously it helps to have a quick deck, hunter puts you on a clock.
Easiest way to learn to beat hunter is to play it a bit.
Druid. It's terrible for a natural control player (I mean, I like to control stuff, and even with midrange and aggroish decks I aim to keep the board control as way to win). The infinite seasons of combo druid were really excrutiating, and to be honest there is practically not a single druid deck that were somewhat interesting to play against, you either kept all their minions at check every turn while protecting your face from damage or you dead... well, or they are a jade druid that for some reason topdecks and mulligans like he had manipulated the fabric of time to get the best odds possible and I have to sweat blood to (very ocasionally) grab the win although having to deal with big ass golems and fandral shenanigans before turn 9.
Let's just say I never liked Malfurion, but this is the game that made me definitively hate him. Well, this and the spectacle he made in Legion.
Today in my free brawl pack I got Barongeddon, then I had a cup of fresh green tea. As a result of that, I think Priest is OP because my keyboard is not a mechanical one. I hope Blizzard will address this issue.
I don't lose much to Hunters but control Warrior is my pain in the ass. Thankfully I beat PW most of the times. I'm thinking on using my dust to build a CW (both Fire Plum and the Wild CW) only to learn its flaws and maybe embrace Warrior because as of now, I hate this class
Easy, most loss are to mage, never really got the nick to destroy those bastard !
If did not hate that class I would play it for a season to learn what annoys them most but... Na won't do it.
I just do not like that class period.
Priests, that's what annoys us the most. There is not a single class I hate more than Priest, it's like, my levels of hate for Priest and the second most hated class, which would be possibly Hunter, is Galaxies apart, that far. This is what Mages don't like. It's not just a coincidence I don't play against Priests... Well also they steal all your shit and I personally hate that.
Noted, thanks for the tip, played priest last season for he first time in two years. I may try again next month
throughout Hearthstones history I dont think I have lost more games to Hunters than any other class.
Its the most ridiculous easy to play to burst a shit tone of face dmg class. I hate them. They are all low lifes.
What about you?
you dont understand the thread. I didnt say that. learn to read.
I lost vs Hunter the most times too... I can relate
lol
I play priest almost exclusively so quite naturally so I tend to despise rogues, to the point where I tech heavily against them. But nothing is worse than a bad mulli against aggro, regardless of class. Aggro/tempo warrior. Aggro druid. "Midrange" aggro/token shaman. Murloc aggro or midrange paladin. Secret/tempo mage. Quest rogue even feels like an aggro deck at times. Hyena hunter. If you biff your mulli against these decks it's pretty much over, often even if they draw worse than you do.
A shaman with god tier topdecks is also one of the most frustrating things I've encountered, even after they've lost trogg and totem golem. Sustain - check. Burst/reach - check. Board control/wipes - check. Tempo swings - check. Fits in one archetype? Check. Shaman is still one of the most versatile and punitively stupid classes to beat right now. It's honestly not that I've lost too much against them compared to other classes, I think, but that each fight seems so unnecessarily difficult and tedious. The salt floweth, but I care not. Fite me.
For me it is Rouge for sure . As main Paladin player ( not secretpally) , Rouge is one of the toughest decks to beat. When Auctioneer was five mana and Leeroy four ,it was a auto loss back then. Against Questrouge it's not much easyier .
I mostly play as priest and I have problems against Rouge the most often. It is probably the class that I lose to the most and then in second place would be Warrior because you know...pirate warrior.
Then you probably need to learn to play more for control / value, the weaknesses of the hunter class. Obviously it helps to have a quick deck, hunter puts you on a clock.
Easiest way to learn to beat hunter is to play it a bit.
It must be the Face Hunter long time ago. And after that, Pirate Warrior.
Druid. It's terrible for a natural control player (I mean, I like to control stuff, and even with midrange and aggroish decks I aim to keep the board control as way to win). The infinite seasons of combo druid were really excrutiating, and to be honest there is practically not a single druid deck that were somewhat interesting to play against, you either kept all their minions at check every turn while protecting your face from damage or you dead... well, or they are a jade druid that for some reason topdecks and mulligans like he had manipulated the fabric of time to get the best odds possible and I have to sweat blood to (very ocasionally) grab the win although having to deal with big ass golems and fandral shenanigans before turn 9.
Let's just say I never liked Malfurion, but this is the game that made me definitively hate him. Well, this and the spectacle he made in Legion.
P.D.: This thread really needs a poll.
Click to see my Hearthstone projects:
By far, the worst enemy I've EVER faced in Hearthstone is Lady luck.
Easy, most loss are to mage, never really got the nick to destroy those bastard !
If did not hate that class I would play it for a season to learn what annoys them most but... Na won't do it.
I just do not like that class period.
As a Mage, I usually lose against Hunter.
I like playing against Priest though.
Quest Rogue by far. It's the only thing I lose to consistently, b/c I never seem to get my Dirty Rats, and I play control.
#gNOmeferatu
I don't lose much to Hunters but control Warrior is my pain in the ass. Thankfully I beat PW most of the times. I'm thinking on using my dust to build a CW (both Fire Plum and the Wild CW) only to learn its flaws and maybe embrace Warrior because as of now, I hate this class
Quest Rogue. How do you beat it? What is the most effective deck that is not aggro?