I think everyone is overreacting,just because a few Devolopers(there is no official number) moved to other games does this not mean that the game is "dead" it still has his Community and its still going to get updates with more Heroes and new events.
The loss of developers sucks, but yeah, that's not that huge. As I've mentioned before, the problem is that they're removing all sponsored competitive play, which means that a) a lot of top players are abandoning HotS, and b) HotS will be lower visibility, which means less players and longer queue times. These are liable to compound on each other and send HotS into a death spiral. It won't be immediate, and there's a chance for things to change, but as it stands now HotS is on a dead-end road.
Lol... Dont pay anything and save up for free? Too much trouble? You want your broken stuff to stick around forever? No? You want your broken stuff played to mean your entire deck gets refunded? So all you have to do is play broken cards which will get nerfed, so you never have to pay for a deck again?
Before posting anything, please make sure you've thought things through, which you're possibly incapable of and in that case you should not post.
Cool your heels, bro. I get where you're coming from, but seriously, have a little empathy. OP is frustrated because he (?) put time and quite possibly money into making a strong deck, but Blizzard's nerfs hit the deck hard with minimal recompensation. Insulting his intelligence is uncalled for, and honestly says a lot more about you than it does him.
Wait what happened? Did they shut down Heroes of the Storm?
No, but they're removing developers from the HotS team and canceling most tournaments... and without tournaments or frequent updates, the fan base is going to dwindle (not that it was that large to begin with). So they aren't shutting it down, but they've effectively put it on a death timer.
Hm, I'm pretty much the opposite: I almost always make Commons or Rares (or occasionally Epics), and have a pretty strong bias against Legendaries. I find that it's easy to clutter a Legendary, both mechanically- because the character they represent is usually complex- and visually, by virtue of the dragon along the top of the card. (Clutter is also the reason why I prefer cheap cards, cards that don't generate tokens, and cards with 3 or fewer lines of text.)
In my opinion, flashiness and professionalism are often at odds with each other, so in order for me to consider voting for a Legendary, the effect needs to be simple.
0
The loss of developers sucks, but yeah, that's not that huge. As I've mentioned before, the problem is that they're removing all sponsored competitive play, which means that a) a lot of top players are abandoning HotS, and b) HotS will be lower visibility, which means less players and longer queue times. These are liable to compound on each other and send HotS into a death spiral. It won't be immediate, and there's a chance for things to change, but as it stands now HotS is on a dead-end road.
0
Love the Talking Heads reference, I'd give it a +1 if I could.
0
Cool your heels, bro. I get where you're coming from, but seriously, have a little empathy. OP is frustrated because he (?) put time and quite possibly money into making a strong deck, but Blizzard's nerfs hit the deck hard with minimal recompensation. Insulting his intelligence is uncalled for, and honestly says a lot more about you than it does him.
0
Just referencing the "Omae Wa Mou Shindeiro... Nani?" meme. Thought it fit the video.
0
No, but they're removing developers from the HotS team and canceling most tournaments... and without tournaments or frequent updates, the fan base is going to dwindle (not that it was that large to begin with). So they aren't shutting it down, but they've effectively put it on a death timer.
0
Serious RIP, I'm going to miss HotS for sure. At least Hearthstone is too big to be touched.
0
...Nani?
0
More importantly, that means they're nerfing both Baku and Justicar, which is a whole lot of dust to give away.
0
Hm, I'm pretty much the opposite: I almost always make Commons or Rares (or occasionally Epics), and have a pretty strong bias against Legendaries. I find that it's easy to clutter a Legendary, both mechanically- because the character they represent is usually complex- and visually, by virtue of the dragon along the top of the card. (Clutter is also the reason why I prefer cheap cards, cards that don't generate tokens, and cards with 3 or fewer lines of text.)
In my opinion, flashiness and professionalism are often at odds with each other, so in order for me to consider voting for a Legendary, the effect needs to be simple.
Just my two cents.
1
I don't see a problem with hype... why is it childish to be excited for something that you enjoy?
0
Quite a few eggs this season...
0
Hum, that's a lot of eggs...
3
At first I laughed when I saw Ultrasaur...
I ain't laughin' no more.
0
I'm a fan. Probably has a little bit of chaff, but for the most part, this looks like a solid win condition.
0
A) They're different classes, so they have different archetypes and can't really be compared.
B) Eggs. At least in Wild this is strong.