Do you think this is just another cancer Shaman deck? I mean there are not all the typical 'cancer' Shaman cards in it like doomhammer, 4mana7/7, lava burst and so on.
I hit rank 4 with this deck yesterday for the very first time (yeah ;) so it worked pretty well for me.
So just let me know what you think about the cancer factor of this deck :)
You see , we've reached a point in this game where every shaman deck is considered to be cancerous. (except for those shit gimmicky control shaman thingies) So I'm not going to decide whether this deck IS or IS NOT cancerous since that'd be pretty pointless. The deck tho seems to be performing really well. Nicely done. But you might wanna change the name since Spirit Claws didn't make a new archetype and hence the name is nonsensical to some extent.
The intention of the post is also to present an alternative to the face aggro shaman players so they'll maybe change their style of play to make the meta a bit more interesting than it is now. Thats why i looked out for some thoughts about this one :)
Yes its a 5/5 taunt...nothing more nothing less...the deck by itself has not as much tempo as the classic face Shaman as you can See ( 2 mana tide totems e.g.)...So i think in this deck it seems legit to add it as a tempo swing option
Yes its a 5/5 taunt...nothing more nothing less...the deck by itself has not as much tempo as the classic face Shaman as you can See ( 2 mana tide totems e.g.)...So i think in this deck it seems legit to add it as a tempo swing option
As a Priest main -- I'd disenchant ALL my Shaman, Warrior, Rogue and Warlock cards for a priest 0 mana 5/5 taunt.
yes we don´t have to argue about that it is a great card but you dont win the game by crushing the 0 mana 5/5 in the opponents face like the the strong shaman spells or doomhammer and just ignore the enemys board. With this deck you win by controling the board and it works fine. Thats what i wanted to show. By flaming the 0 mana 5/5 the shaman loses all his right to exist...just my tought about this
No, because according to most people on these forums Midrange is still Aggro because it goes face. Also Control is still Aggro if it's a Hunter or Shaman deck. Anyways, sarcasm aside people really don't understand the difference between Aggro and Midrange.
No, because according to most people on these forums Midrange is still Aggro because it goes face. Also Control is still Aggro if it's a Hunter or Shaman deck. Anyways, sarcasm aside people really don't understand the difference between Aggro and Midrange.
Wtf?
The beatdown/control concept is a different one than labelling decks and archetypes. Freeze mage is beatdown vs control warrior (control vs. everything else) and zoo is control vs face warrior.
In hearthstone, the archetypes are generally labelled after its number of high-drops. 2 or more 6+ drops, and it is generally midrange rather than aggro. That the same decks tend to be the agressor (beatdown) in most matchups, do not necessarily mean they are aggro-decks.
The OP deck runs Al-akir and 1 fire-ele, among with several value cards over face-damage, so it is most defiitely a midrage deck.
No, because according to most people on these forums Midrange is still Aggro because it goes face. Also Control is still Aggro if it's a Hunter or Shaman deck. Anyways, sarcasm aside people really don't understand the difference between Aggro and Midrange.
Wtf?
The beatdown/control concept is a different one than labelling decks and archetypes. Freeze mage is beatdown vs control warrior (control vs. everything else) and zoo is control vs face warrior.
In hearthstone, the archetypes are generally labelled after its number of high-drops. 2 or more 6+ drops, and it is generally midrange rather than aggro. That the same decks tend to be the agressor (beatdown) in most matchups, do not necessarily mean they are aggro-decks.
The OP deck runs Al-akir and 1 fire-ele, among with several value cards over face-damage, so it is most defiitely a midrage deck.
Apparently you didn't pay enough attention to my post. I quite clearly stated that I was being sarcastic about that. I was mentioning the fact that most of the time people on these forums don't know the difference between Aggro and Midrange. I play a Midrange Hunter.
This deck is more or less a copy of the Deck from Toymachine :)
yeah sure i never said i invented this deck by myself :D i just wanted to know if it is perceived as a cancerous deck :D thats the intention of the thread
This deck is more or less a copy of the Deck from Toymachine :)
yeah sure i never said i invented this deck by myself :D i just wanted to know if it is perceived as a cancerous deck :D thats the intention of the thread
That's pretty stupid then honestly. Play what you want. If you want I can message you every time you play a deck and call it cancer. Does that mean you won't play it?
Ask for critiques of the deck, don't ask about how it's perceived. Shaman is arguably the strongest class right now so obviously it will get some hate no matter what it runs.
Hey guys i want to know what you think about this deck here:
Do you think this is just another cancer Shaman deck? I mean there are not all the typical 'cancer' Shaman cards in it like doomhammer, 4mana7/7, lava burst and so on.
I hit rank 4 with this deck yesterday for the very first time (yeah ;) so it worked pretty well for me.
So just let me know what you think about the cancer factor of this deck :)
Thx
You see , we've reached a point in this game where every shaman deck is considered to be cancerous. (except for those shit gimmicky control shaman thingies) So I'm not going to decide whether this deck IS or IS NOT cancerous since that'd be pretty pointless. The deck tho seems to be performing really well. Nicely done. But you might wanna change the name since Spirit Claws didn't make a new archetype and hence the name is nonsensical to some extent.
Ok thx man i changed the name :)
The intention of the post is also to present an alternative to the face aggro shaman players so they'll maybe change their style of play to make the meta a bit more interesting than it is now. Thats why i looked out for some thoughts about this one :)
0 mana 5/5 taunt.
*Triggered*
Yes its a 5/5 taunt...nothing more nothing less...the deck by itself has not as much tempo as the classic face Shaman as you can See ( 2 mana tide totems e.g.)...So i think in this deck it seems legit to add it as a tempo swing option
yes we don´t have to argue about that it is a great card but you dont win the game by crushing the 0 mana 5/5 in the opponents face like the the strong shaman spells or doomhammer and just ignore the enemys board. With this deck you win by controling the board and it works fine. Thats what i wanted to show. By flaming the 0 mana 5/5 the shaman loses all his right to exist...just my tought about this
No, because according to most people on these forums Midrange is still Aggro because it goes face. Also Control is still Aggro if it's a Hunter or Shaman deck. Anyways, sarcasm aside people really don't understand the difference between Aggro and Midrange.
Editor of the Heartpwn Legendary Crafting Guide:
https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/card-discussion/205920-legendary-tier-list-crafting-guide