"warrior without Shieldmaiden will be weak in standard"
- hillandder
- Registered User
-
Member for 8 years, 1 month, and 13 days
Last active Mon, Mar, 14 2022 10:20:05 -
- 8
- 23
- 116
- 1 Follower
- 7,242 Total Posts
- 7968 Thanks
-
3
Ubiquitous91 posted a message on New Warrior Card - Ancient ShieldbearerPosted in: Card Discussion -
2
Sanzen posted a message on New Card - Eater of SecretsPosted in: Card Discussionpoor pallys. now they'll have to learn how to play the game again lol
-
2
KKeegan posted a message on New Card - Eater of SecretsPosted in: Card DiscussionQuote from BigFatMurloc >>This card will lose you more games than itll win you. Of cause if ladder is like 85% Secret pala and freeze mage this card might be ok. However even in those matchups you need to draw it. In some games itll be down in your deck and in most mathcups its an unplayable statet minion that loses you the game vs rogue, or any control deck.
I gave it some thought and ill go with this card is just bad.
Agreed. But still is a "safety valve" card: without it the possibility of a paladin spamfest in wild was pretty high... The mere existence of this card will potentially keep secret mechanic under control in wild for a long time... We'll see if it will be played or not, but personally I'm glad that exists just for balance's sake.Exactly this. Finally someone to understand it. This card will NOT be played. But it will protect the meta from any Secret deck dominance.There should be a lot of cards like that, that directly counter some decks so they can not dictate the meta like Paladin Secret, Patron Warrior or Undertaker Hunter did. With such cards, you know you can play secrets because Eater of Secrets won't be played. But you know no secret deck will become as prevalent as Secret Paladin because this card would immediately destroy it. With more cards like that, the meta would be completely open and with more variety.For once, GJ Blizzard, this is a smart move. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
3
Well, it is a hobby, you spend money/time for fun, if you have fun it is ok.
1
Well, 400 dust coming...
1
2 this card and 2 mana wyrm reduces a lot the chances of you doing nothing in your first turn.
A lot of hunter playing 3/2 beasts in turn 2 (or turn 1 with coin) or zoo, shaman and others classes playing 1/1 divine shield in turn 1, doing nothing in your first turn can cost you the game.
How many games you win with very low health?
1
1
If is a warlock card I agree with negative comments, have a lot of others good minions for 1 mana spot, for mage this is a must include.
We will see, any deck other than freeze mage run 2 of this one like mana wyrm.
1
2
2
The only downside of this card is not be a beast, a murlock or a dragon... :P
2
Any mage deck except for freeze mage will run this card, only mana wyrm a 1 drop minion is not enough.
If novice enginner cost 1 mana instead 2 will see a lot more play.
Draw of a deck is a little better than receive a random spell mage, if is another class I agree is not great but mage have a lot of good spells.
1