• 1

    posted a message on New Rogue Legendary Card - Heistbaron Togwaggle
    Quote from Shiny >>

    This reminds me of folk losing their minds over Floop.

     I still lose my mind over the fact that the community didn't figure out a deck for Floop. The natural synergy with taunt druid was insane. Hadronox, Lich king, CUBE. 

    I just don't get it and while I have gotten a golden Floop in packs, druid was always my least favorite class and didn't really experiment at all with Floop, literally one game I think I played with a Floop deck. But I remember flooping a Hadronox and feeling super good about it. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New Rogue Legendary Card - Heistbaron Togwaggle

    Some people seem to think this card is bad because the treasure are only good in specific situations that you can't often control.

    Well, you are incorrect. The treasure are straight up OP cards that will generate more tempo or value for its cost than most OP cards in the game. They don't need to be supported by a combo deck or some broken togwaggle scheme combo. Especially since you get to chose which treasure you want to use. 

    The only way for this card to be bad, is that pirate warrior meta comes back and people die on turn 5. Otherwise rogue can get to Vanish turn into Togwaggle turn into Treasure turn and start to out value you from this point.

    So this card is :

    Decent against aggro, 7 mana 5/5 + lackey isn't the end of the world.

    Ridiculously strong against other archetypes.

    People need to understand that many good cards come from the fact that they need very little deck building restriction in exchange for a strong effect. Think about quest warrior + stonehill + echo taunt. That's 5 cards for a ragnaros hero power. Togwaggle literally needs ONE lackey in the deck that only serves the purpose of comboing with togwaggle. This is the strength of this card. You pay 2 cards in your deck in exchange for Treasure. Now just build a strong tier 1 rogue deck and add this 2 cards combo. GG, you have a stronger deck. Just like Odd warrior added a couple taunts and a quest and got stronger.

    Edit : I don't think this is worthy of a Nerf. Yes it's strong, easy to set up and can win games. That's fine. It's still attached to a 2 cards combo and 7 mana cost. It's not just play the card win the game.

    They didn't nerf DK rexxar and DK gul'dan, they are not going to nerf this lol. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Kripp - "Forbidden Words is insanely strong!"
    Quote from Pacific_Onion >>

    He mentioned how 0 mana spells are extremely powerful, a point he again referred to when giving Lazul's Scheme 5 stars, but Forbidden cards are not true 0 mana cards, more like X mana. I'm not sure why he thinks this card is more powerful because it has a 0 in the card cost.

     Because of Lyra and Auctioneer, 0 mana spells allow you to cycle for free. I believe priest now has more 0 mana spells than rogue. 

    But in the case of Forbidden words, I'm not sure you can dump it for 0 mana on any target, this would require a 0 atk minion on the board. So you are correct it is not truly a 0 mana spell for this cycling matter. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 4

    posted a message on Big Priest - 2 year of censer

    Barnes is alright, it's resurrect and eternal servitude that are the most broken retarded overpowered cards that shouldn't have been printed. 2 mana summon a 8+ mana legendary is not fair nor balanced. I don't care that you can play around. You could play around 0 mana keleseth and 5 mana Pyroblast, doesn't mean they would be fair cards.

    All the resurrect type cards should summon a 1/1 instead of original minion. That wouldn't even kill the deck. 

    Posted in: Wild Format
  • 1

    posted a message on Kripp - "Forbidden Words is insanely strong!"

    It's not Entomb level but yeah, I agree with Kripp on this one. I don't see a reason not to play this card in priest, unless you have deck building restrictions. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Is it just me or does 'Shadows' look half-cocked?
    Quote from Stock_speaketh >>
    Quote from Terrorsquid66 >>

    I agree 100%   It is SOOOOOO super obvious they are being lazy. ... But literally kobolds and catacombs felt so much more fun

    The most busted, most OP set of recent Year, if not ever, is your favorite. I feel like someone's opinion is invalid here.

     Opinions aren't invalid. Your reasoning is invalid though, makes literally no sense. 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 8

    posted a message on New Card - Madame Lazul

    Looks like Curious Glimmerroot and Chameleos had a baby. 

    Good card, hope it doesn't end up like Chameleos. Lazul does look slightly better. 

     

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 3

    posted a message on The Worst Hearthstone Cards That Deserve To Be a Disenchanted (Gadgetzan Gazzete)
    Quote from Almaniarra >>
    Quote from Strongpoint >>

    I like the content... It is interesting. But rating system here can motivate inexperienced players to disenchant 0-1 star cards with quite high potential like:

    The Voraxx All that this card needs is broken enough spells that can target your minions. It can very well jump from unplayable to one that will give dust because of being nerfed. Also, plants is a likely tribe that can be added in the future.

    Lilian Voss Thief rogue will get more, more, more and more goods. At some point turning your spells into random crap may actually become a good idea. Also, more and more "add barely useful spells (like bananas)" cards will get into the game.

    Rummaging Kobold Is already a quite useful card in a wild jade shaman. Can go broken every time when there are a weapon that really needs to be equipped more that 2(1) times

    Drakkari Enchanter Who can know what broken end of turn effect(s) will be printed in future?

    And so on...

     

    Drakkari Enchanter helped me climb 15 to 5 with a silly End of turn priest deck Thanks to Shadow Ascendant + Cobalt Scalebane + Green Jelly. Also Ysera and The Lich King was op enough to draw value from Drakkari Enchanter. I have even my name of that archetype as "Enchanter Priest". lol.

    1 copy of Rummaging Kobold is a useful tool for Thief rogue against some control match-ups which has two weapon removal, but if you don't use your hero power. You should know that if you are using the kobold in your deck. :D


    The only card that exteremely and instantly needs to be dusted is Cursed Blade and it is not nowadays topic. lol

    And I never dust Open the Waygate, that card is more effective in wild thanks to Ice Block, I would not dust any of legendaries any time after what I've done for gvg... anyways, I've just wanted to mention that quest :D

     I play cursed blade in my pirate warrior and it has won me so many game. People make INSANE missplays when they see this equipped. 

    Recently I played against hunter, I played Cursed Blade turn 1, Ship's Cannon turn 2, he coined Eaglehorn Bow and went face. He did 6 damage and lost the game.

    This happens a lot. Mages that coin ping face, etc. Cursed blade is a terrible top deck but a very strong turn 1.

    + it's an adventure card, it was really nice to collect those cards and I would hate to dust it for 5 dust atoms. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on New card - Omega Devastator

    Dead card in hand for the first 9 turns, very much overrated from what I read in the comments, like all the omega cards before. Although the vanilla stats are better than Omega Agent which is the best omega card and sees a bit of play (much more post rotation I expect), so yeah it's a decent removal tool, but warrior is never short on removals.

    Obviously this would see play in a mech Warrior list. I'm just saying, in any other deck, this is pretty average/low power. I guess brawl + this is a nice combo. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on New card - Rafaam's Scheme

     So it summons X 1/1 imps or 1 X/X imp or X X/X imps ? With blizzard confirmation please, or I'll assume you don't know. 

    Posted in: Card Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.