• 3

    posted a message on Make generated cards known to both players
    Quote from UltraJeeves >>

    Card generation upsets a lot of players, but also allows for more game variety and situational play.

    Possible fix: Why not make generated cards known to both players?

    The player generating cards can still respond flexibly to the game state, but her or his opponent will have a much better idea of what to expect and can plan and play accordingly.

     kind of okay with the idea... similar to TCGs wherein you have to prove / show to your opponent that the card you tutored is indeed the one mentioned in the card played

    "Search your library / deck for X card and show it to your opponent, afterwards, shuffle the deck"

    somewhat gives you an idea that a said card is in hand and gives you a chance to play around it (as you said) but I don't think blizz will implement such mechanics...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on But when the world needed it the most, it vanished

    What card/s do you think would do good in this meta (talking about Standard here)? These cards are not necessarily bad cards but these are cards that would have done good to make a difference in today's meta. Examples are:

    From Classic:

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Shaman Class Redesign Concept

    Nice ideas. Was really thinking about Shaman yesterday (toying with Elemental Shaman) and realized that Shaman just has too many mechanics going on at this point.

    • Overload
    • If you are Overloaded
    • Murlocs
    • Play a spell the turn prior
    • Play an elemental the turn prior

    The last of the two is a let-down since it probably would've been better if Marshspawn and Shattered Rumbler could trigger even if you cast the spell the current turn. Same probably with those that requires having used an Elemental (e.g., Liliypad Lurker and Arid Stormer) the turn prior (would've been better if it also allowed the use of an Elemental on that same turn). Maybe this could actually be a keyword as well like:

    Recycle: If you did it this turn or last turn.

    • Then maybe Landslide could read: "Deal 1 damage to all enemy minions. Recycle Overload, deal 1 damage again"
    • Or Marshspawn. "Battlecry: Recycle Spell, Discover a Spell"

    Although there might be a better keyword for it. Haha. Might help you with more ideas.

    Posted in: Fan Creations
  • 1

    posted a message on Why doesn't token druid run Sea Giant?

    Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe the only neutral giant left in Standard is Clockwork Giant

    Posted in: Druid
  • 1

    posted a message on Deck Of Lunacy Needs another revision/Nerf

    What if Deck of Lunacy worked like Zayle, Shadow Cloak or Whizbang the Wonderful wherein it gives you a deck instead composed of random spells that cost three less?

    For those unfamiliar how the two aforementioned cards work, when you use either of the two to create a deck, it is the only card in the deck as it uses pre-made decks. In this case however, it could read like "At the start of the game, shuffle 30 random spells to your deck and then transform them into one that costs three more. It keeps its original cost." 

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Looking for comments to improve this deck

    Testing out new things and realized that Devouring Plague ticks 4 times if your health is below 27 and hence reduces Flesh Giant's cost by 4. Looking for replacement suggestions for some cards.

    The deck is technically a Corrupted Priest

    Corrupted Priest
    Export to BBCode Export to Cockatrice Export to MarkDown Export to Html Clone this deck
    Minion (15) Ability (15)
    Loading Collection

    Posted in: General Deck Building
  • 2

    posted a message on Y'Shaarj and Solar eclipse
    Quote from DNsingbanana >>

    If you double cast a Moontouched Amulet thanks to Solar Eclipse, Y'shaarj will not give you an additional Amulet after that. Don't know if this is intended or not

     Technically you only played one Moontouched Amulet. Y'Shaarj, the Defiler reads for each corrupted card you've played...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on people who defend blizzard greed
    Quote from Asuryan >>

    I see Hearthstone as a CCG, not a video game. Coming from an MtG background, HS is incredibly cheap. I don’t get what all the fuss is about.

     

    Quote from rogimonde >>

    I used to pay 49.99 USD for expacs like 2-3 years ago, and I'm paying the same amount now....and maybe the gold id get from doing quests a month before the expac

    - now i have duplicate protection

    - get a free pre-expansion legendary

    - get a free legendary on logging in after expac releases

    - there are 6 quests now, and you get xp from losing as well

    WTF are ya'll talking about, you don't need to get every single skin in the game, or get every single card in the game (you didn't do that before either so stfu). You can choose to collect all the cards in the game so you have some fancy hero power in duels if you want, you don't even have to play that, just play the standard game that you did before when the game was "less" expensive. All collectable card games are like this...

    Its literally not getting more expensive; its less than what it was 2-3 years ago, only valid argument would be that you maybe get old packs as a reward...also businesses need to generate more revenue so they can release more content, so they're offering new incentives, but you can still play the collectible card game that you enjoyed 2-3 years ago, w/o any increase in price... 

     

     

    points have been said here. honestly. I spend some money for this game to at least show support. Based on experience (and I've been a player since Season 1 mind you) it's a lot cheaper right now.

    Before the duplicate protection:
    - I would spend about $100 (getting the pre-purchase and packs) and not have a complete collection and far from completion at that

    Before the achievement system:
    - I would accumulate just a few gold before the expansion releases (2000g at the most because I can't be dedicated as I want to be due to my occupation). That assumes I have a near complete or complete collection.

    After both:
    - Complete collection at just $100
    - Already at 1000 gold and still a few levels before reaching 50
    ****
    Anyway, supporting what you call "greedy" company because like what others said, it's a similar to MtG for me. Anyway, $100 is similar to me buying an expansion in WoW plus subscription for 4 months (WoW might be more expensive, don't know... don't play). Bottomline - they're a business.

    Now if you cannot even respect our stand or opinion on that matter, it's your problem, not ours. From what I see, you're asking for an explanation but at the same time expecting a specific answer that suits your arguments.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: Asclepius#11408

    Region: NA

    Trade Only?: Yes, you go first

    Done

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Nerf Predictions

    Lightning Bloom to "Refresh two mana crystals" still with the Overload (2) that way the insane combos (I'm guessing it was intended for such) can still exist but not ramp much.
    Argent Braggart to 3 mana
    Sorcerer's Apprentice will read "Cards cannot be reduced to less than one (1)"
    Hand of A'dal to "+2/+1"
    Kael'thas Sunstrider to third spell costs (1)
    Secret Passage to cost 2 or 3 or reduce amount of cards to 4

    Or probably bring old cards back that were considered "problematic"
    Spellbreaker

    Or rotate some older expansions here and there similar to that event we had last year.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)
    Quote from AsclepiusMD >>

    Battletag: Asclepius#11408
    Region: NA
    Trade only? Yes. You go first.

    Internet Problems. Seems to be up and about now.

    Battletag: Asclepius#11408
    Region: NA
    Trade only? Yes. You go first.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: Asclepius#11408
    Region: NA
    Trade only? Yes. You go first.

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Deck Tracker for Mac

    Is there any deck tracker for Mac?

    I recently switched to a Macbook due to it being much more useful for productive stuff like the demands of medical school. Is there any deck tracker for Mac? This is one of the only games I play since the demands for the graphics are not that much.

    Using a Macbook Air (latest model).

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on 1500 XP Quest Trading - Play A Friend! (#7)

    Battletag: Asclepius#11408

    Region: US

    Trade only? : yes, you go first

    DONE

    Posted in: Players and Teams Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Username Change Request Thread

    Requesting to change to AsclepiusMD :)

    Posted in: Site Feedback & Support
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.