2x Unleash is pretty easy. They hard-mulligan every card away which isn't a Unleash the skill. They don't use unleash until turn 4/5, so pretty good chance of getting it until that turn. After playing the first Skill-Unleash, the buzzard is doing a good job by getting the second unleash. If they still don't have unleash, Skill-Tracking is gonna fish it pretty easily anyway.
Actually I'm over 20. I only do that to Hunters, because I wanna make them mad and they should feel bad about playing that class (oh how ironically, I play warlock, right?). So the queston is: Are you a hunter player Megatron? Because you already feel insulted by my thread.
That's not really fair. I've been playing Hunter since I started playing Hearthstone and it's not my fault that everyone is playing Hunter this week. Two weeks ago everyone was playing Zoo. Last week everyone was playing Ramp Druid. I've stuck to Hunter for months, even when it's weaker and unpopular. Why single out all Hunters and Huntresses? We're not all bandwagon junkies.
I'm playing warlock most of the time because like I said before, I like fast games, and eventually don't have time to play this game 8hours a day.
[...]
but obviously enough time to "slowroll, miss lethal and spam emotes"....
you wanna punish peope for playing a deck you like, but i guess you don't want to be punished like that for playing the most hated deck out there. so please stop being immature and treat other persons with respect.
Well, for BMing Hunters, I always take my time, since I really enjoy it. Btw guys, after I was playing against 5 hunters out of my 5 games, I decited to be part of the cancer: I'm officially a hunter player! I think I'll get legend in 1 hour (rank 3 atm) since Hunter is OP as fuck and I shoulnd't lose any game, because unlike all other Hunter-Bandwagon players, my IQ is above 10.
Edit: Now guess what People: As soon as I was started playing hunter, my ENEMY obviously doesn't play hunter anymore. Then I switched back to zoo and guess what, all day hunters! Fuck that game, probably gonna deinstall it and wait for a meta which isn't cancerous like that. I would gladly play against zoo or miracle rogue all day, this is the worst of the worst.
I'm playing warlock most of the time because like I said before, I like fast games, and eventually don't have time to play this game 8hours a day.
[...]
but obviously enough time to "slowroll, miss lethal and spam emotes"....
you wanna punish peope for playing a deck you like, but i guess you don't want to be punished like that for playing the most hated deck out there. so please stop being immature and treat other persons with respect.
Well, for BMing Hunters, I always take my time, since I really enjoy it. Btw guys, after I was playing against 5 hunters out of my 5 games, I decited to be part of the cancer: I'm officially a hunter player! I think I'll get legend in 1 hour (rank 3 atm) since Hunter is OP as fuck and I shoulnd't lose any game, because unlike all other Hunter-Bandwagon players, my IQ is above 10.
Edit: Now guess what People: As soon as I was starting playing hunter, my ENEMY obviously doesn't play hunter anymore. Then I switched back to zoo and guess what, all day hunters! Fuck that game...
If your that mad at the game just play something else no point in forcing your self to play a game you don't like? I don't understand you....
Actually I'm over 20. I only do that to Hunters, because I wanna make them mad and they should feel bad about playing that class (oh how ironically, I play warlock, right?). So the queston is: Are you a hunter player Megatron? Because you already feel insulted by my thread.
No. If anything, we find it ironic that a zoo player is bitching about another deck populating the ladder and being OP. What brainpower does zoo take? None. Hunter, on the other hand, is one of the hardest decks in hearthstone to play correctly. Why don't you try playing another deck? Is it because you know that you don't have enough skill level to play anything that isn't zoo?
While i hate Hunter with the passion of a thousand suns due to innate weird design where it's either feast or famine depending on the meta, i have too agree with This ^ Post.
You play Zoo, an equally broken deck that happens to be countered by a class that is currently popular. The fact that you're so salty means you can't beat them, no matter how hard you try, because you can't build decks yourself. You can only play the OP decks Reynad makes.
I for one think it's a window of oppertunities. Hunter is so easily countered, that any deck with 80/20 winrate against hunter and 50/50 winrate against other classes, can get you legend in no time. I'm cruising through the ranks with a rogue deck that wins against hunter nearly every time.
I'm tired od playing warrior control just because of f***ing hunters, i want to play mage or shaman or any kind of warlock, but i can't. Hunter has no real counter, only some 50/50 games (like control warrior or rogue), and he destroys hard time any shaman, mage or warlock deck 85% of time. What some of you people don't f***ing understand when you say "play counter deck", is that some people don't want to f***ing counter Hunter forever, they rather want to have fun with some classes and decks other than ones that are countering clearly op class at this moment, and to have equal odds to win against hunter with that classes.
I'm tired od playing warrior control just because of f***ing hunters, i want to play mage or shaman or any kind of warlock, but i can't. Hunter has no real counter, only some 50/50 games (like control warrior or rogue), and he destroys hard time any shaman, mage or warlock deck 85% of time. What some of you people don't f***ing understand when you say "play counter deck", is that some people don't want to f***ing counter Hunter forever, they rather want to have fun with some classes and decks other than ones that are countering clearly op class at this moment, and to have equal odds to win against hunter with that classes.
That's exceptionally harsh of you to be that way. Why not just play the decks you want to anyway, you can win with any deck and hunter isn't as all powerful as you make it out to be. Just play smart. No need to be insulting or act like every person who plays hunter is doing it just to ruin your game experience.
Today I went laddering again with some good results. I won every game and got to rank 3 again. Then there it is; The hunter zone. At rank 3-1 all I ever meet is hunters and they are simply unbeatable. I'm playing zoo since ever, I really like fast paced games and I enjoy the whole mechanic (filling up your board, refueling your hand with hero power). The tactic works against every class, but not against hunters. If I wanna put up some pressure and create a strong board, they simply have more targets to unleash the skill on, so they literally draw their whole deck and got answers for everything anyway. If I try to play it tactical and just play big minions like Iron Dwarf, Doomguard and Life Tap on the early turns, then there is simply not enough pressure and they just take out big threats with hunter's mark.
So my question is: Is there an ANTI-Hunter Deck (preferably a warlock deck) which wins against them for a fair amount? All I wanna do is play against them, own them, and then BM like hell (slowrolling, acting like I made a mistake and missed lethal, add them on Friendlist just to flame them and delete them again.
I really hate hunters deeply.
Thanks and have a nice day!
Cronaz
Um, you're a loser. But to answer your question, Warlock is probably the worst class to play against Hunter. Some might say Shaman is worse, but I disagree. If you want to play a Warlock deck in a Hunter-heavy meta, then Zoo is probably your best bet, but don't expect a super-high win rate. Unfortunately, there really isn't a strong counter for Hunter decks, at least not right now. Some decks are slightly favored against Hunter, but no decks that I've seen are strongly favored over Hunter. There is a reason why you're facing 50% or more Hunter opponents ... and it's not just because the Hunter deck is inexpensive. It's also very effective and has a quick pace of play.
If you cant beat em join them. hunter is as badly overpowered today as it was 3 months ago when unleash cost 2 mana more and more i think we need to go back to the original 4 cost that was the closest it has been to balanced
sounds to me like you are playing a deck that is easy to play and have no skills developed. Therefore, when it doesn't go your way, you don't how to play yourself out of it and instead, decide to bitch.
i don't have any issue against hunters, aside from Houndtards, i find the combo Starving Buzzard + Unleash the Hounds extreeeeemely boring, i'm trying to play huntard too but this combo is out of my deck
Seriously though a zoolock player (and a massive BMing zoo player at that) has almost no right to whine about "op" decks, especially if said deck is a complete counter to his deck and he does nothing about it. Why even come to the forums to complain? Seems like a complete waste of time, better to just use that time to find a counter and enjoy your free trip to legend instead of making a fool of yourself
"So my question is: Is there an ANTI-Hunter Deck (preferably a warlock deck) which wins against them for a fair amount? All I wanna do is play against them, own them, and then BM like hell (slowrolling, acting like I made a mistake and missed lethal, add them on Friendlist just to flame them and delete them again."
9/10.
I fell for it, hook line and sinker. For a short time.
2x Unleash is pretty easy. They hard-mulligan every card away which isn't a Unleash the skill. They don't use unleash until turn 4/5, so pretty good chance of getting it until that turn. After playing the first Skill-Unleash, the buzzard is doing a good job by getting the second unleash. If they still don't have unleash, Skill-Tracking is gonna fish it pretty easily anyway.
That's not really fair. I've been playing Hunter since I started playing Hearthstone and it's not my fault that everyone is playing Hunter this week. Two weeks ago everyone was playing Zoo. Last week everyone was playing Ramp Druid. I've stuck to Hunter for months, even when it's weaker and unpopular. Why single out all Hunters and Huntresses? We're not all bandwagon junkies.
Get with it.
Well, for BMing Hunters, I always take my time, since I really enjoy it. Btw guys, after I was playing against 5 hunters out of my 5 games, I decited to be part of the cancer: I'm officially a hunter player! I think I'll get legend in 1 hour (rank 3 atm) since Hunter is OP as fuck and I shoulnd't lose any game, because unlike all other Hunter-Bandwagon players, my IQ is above 10.
Edit: Now guess what People: As soon as I was started playing hunter, my ENEMY obviously doesn't play hunter anymore. Then I switched back to zoo and guess what, all day hunters! Fuck that game, probably gonna deinstall it and wait for a meta which isn't cancerous like that. I would gladly play against zoo or miracle rogue all day, this is the worst of the worst.
If your that mad at the game just play something else no point in forcing your self to play a game you don't like? I don't understand you....
Top 5 Legend every season. Twitch.tv/vbsof
While i hate Hunter with the passion of a thousand suns due to innate weird design where it's either feast or famine depending on the meta, i have too agree with This ^ Post.
I'm currently winning consistently and not even using UTH or the buzzard. I must be doing it wrong! GoGO Hunter power!
You play Zoo, an equally broken deck that happens to be countered by a class that is currently popular. The fact that you're so salty means you can't beat them, no matter how hard you try, because you can't build decks yourself. You can only play the OP decks Reynad makes.
I for one think it's a window of oppertunities. Hunter is so easily countered, that any deck with 80/20 winrate against hunter and 50/50 winrate against other classes, can get you legend in no time. I'm cruising through the ranks with a rogue deck that wins against hunter nearly every time.
I'm tired od playing warrior control just because of f***ing hunters, i want to play mage or shaman or any kind of warlock, but i can't. Hunter has no real counter, only some 50/50 games (like control warrior or rogue), and he destroys hard time any shaman, mage or warlock deck 85% of time. What some of you people don't f***ing understand when you say "play counter deck", is that some people don't want to f***ing counter Hunter forever, they rather want to have fun with some classes and decks other than ones that are countering clearly op class at this moment, and to have equal odds to win against hunter with that classes.
That's exceptionally harsh of you to be that way. Why not just play the decks you want to anyway, you can win with any deck and hunter isn't as all powerful as you make it out to be. Just play smart. No need to be insulting or act like every person who plays hunter is doing it just to ruin your game experience.
Get with it.
Um, you're a loser. But to answer your question, Warlock is probably the worst class to play against Hunter. Some might say Shaman is worse, but I disagree. If you want to play a Warlock deck in a Hunter-heavy meta, then Zoo is probably your best bet, but don't expect a super-high win rate. Unfortunately, there really isn't a strong counter for Hunter decks, at least not right now. Some decks are slightly favored against Hunter, but no decks that I've seen are strongly favored over Hunter. There is a reason why you're facing 50% or more Hunter opponents ... and it's not just because the Hunter deck is inexpensive. It's also very effective and has a quick pace of play.
This class is still broken, guess we never get a balanced game just sucks
If you cant beat em join them. hunter is as badly overpowered today as it was 3 months ago when unleash cost 2 mana more and more i think we need to go back to the original 4 cost that was the closest it has been to balanced
sounds to me like you are playing a deck that is easy to play and have no skills developed. Therefore, when it doesn't go your way, you don't how to play yourself out of it and instead, decide to bitch.
yeah sure is only problem you need like 25000 dust for it to be viable 25000 dust to beat a deck that is brainless and costs like 1500 dusts tops
i don't have any issue against hunters, aside from Houndtards, i find the combo Starving Buzzard + Unleash the Hounds extreeeeemely boring, i'm trying to play huntard too but this combo is out of my deck
They are good, high on the good side and easier to craft. They are far from unbeatable. Either of these decks give it a hard time.
And the mage deck is fairly cheap to craft as well. (under 4k dust.)
So.... 11?
You play zoo. And you're getting pwned by an irritating deck that every twitch zombie is playing at the moment?
I think I can make out tiny violins playing off in the distance....
Yes. People hate you. You chose zoo. You're a self-identified hardcore zoo player.
Oh, yes, I hear violins!
Seriously though a zoolock player (and a massive BMing zoo player at that) has almost no right to whine about "op" decks, especially if said deck is a complete counter to his deck and he does nothing about it. Why even come to the forums to complain? Seems like a complete waste of time, better to just use that time to find a counter and enjoy your free trip to legend instead of making a fool of yourself
"So my question is: Is there an ANTI-Hunter Deck (preferably a warlock deck) which wins against them for a fair amount? All I wanna do is play against them, own them, and then BM like hell (slowrolling, acting like I made a mistake and missed lethal, add them on Friendlist just to flame them and delete them again."
9/10.
I fell for it, hook line and sinker. For a short time.
Well played.