well Imp-losionForbidden Ritual, Feeding Time amongs plenty of other token generation warlock cards that got PO half of famed could be counted as swarm cards
I think Druid decks should be built around Heal druid, not Token Druid.
wee did need a treant themed deck tho, it's one of those mechanics that have been in the game forever (Cenarius and FoN) but were an afterthought for way too long, and no, Lucentbark isn't a treant, it's an ancient, they're different in wow lore.
Granting Rush to a minion that has already attacked will not allow them to attack again. This includes Rush given through Magnetic buffs, where the original minion could attack if it were normally summoned.
there's a bug rn where magnetic "resets" rush, so that you can attack multiple times as long as you magnetize in between attacks
I can't decide who is funnier here - the people beating the "hearthstone is dying" dead horse as hard as they can or the people who think "don't like it? then quit the game" is a valid counterpoint rather than an ultimately quite damaging stance for any game to take.
What I can say is that there's precious little of value here for people deciding if they want to invest in this adventure. As someone who generally loves the solo content and actually bought every solo expansion to date with cash I was very underwhelmed by the first wing. I was really hoping people would have some useful feedback on if the second wing is an improvement worth paying for or just more of the same.
more of the same, the one annoying thing is that the bosses come per wing, while for example Dr has 50 unique bosses or something like that (granted some of them are "repeats" of the same boss with a weaker/stronger deck depending on at what point of the run you face him) Dalaran heist is 75 bosses but they're locked behind each chapter which means, if you only have the first wing you'll only be able to face like 10 bosses, while if you unlock the second wing bosses from the second chapter get added to the first chapter, and so on and so forth, ie, you wont get to fight the carousel on any of the wings if you dont own the third wing, while if you own the third wing you could possibly find the carousel in a first wing run, so in order for the content to be actually as replayable as even RR you have to have unlocked at least 3 wings to even have a decent pool of bosses to play against.
imho, it's ok if you dont get characters for free and unlock when you pay for the wings, i'm fine with anomaly mode only unlocking if you own all the wings, what i'm not fine with is with the bosses, the core gameplay of the run being locked behind a paywall
The only really way to stop netdecking is massively improve the release of new cards, like, a full new expansion with more than 500 cards each every month, the meta never will be refined and netdecks will be much worse because will have many decks avaiable will be impossible to optmize lists can deal with that.
Never will happen.
thats a cool idea on paper but doesnt work in practice, in fact there have been a bunch of card games that tried this approach to solve the entdecking problem and they ended up dying because people felt tey couldnt catch up and had to spend a ton of money, this happened to magi and a bunch of odl star wars tcgs
You spend 1.600 dust to craft a very good or broken card, if the card is nerfed then you paid for a thing and this thing is not waht you paid for anymore, in this case the full refund make sense, the players will feel prejudicated.
Buffs are a completely diferent history, if you craft or open a card and now the card is better you don't lose anything, there is no sense to refund someone don't was prejudicated.
You craft Crystology to use in your Even Paladin deck. Then Crystology is "buffed" down to 1 mana and the card is now useless to you. So in fact, in your eyes, it was actually nerfed. So it follows the same logic as any other card change.
And that's the point - it's when a card is "altered", not when it is specifically nerfed, because any buff can be considered a nerf by someone who feels that way about it. So dust refunds have literally nothing to do with the outcome of a change, but the fact the change has happened in the first place and the card is no longer the card you created / bought.
But then, all that said, dust refunds are completely a kindness by Blizzard anyway and not a contractual obligation to us.
that's more of a Genn an Baku were and mistake and should be deleted/reworked problem rather than the card being "nerfed" for Genn decks because objectively the card got way stronger.
Unpopular opinion here but according to the terms of service we shouldn't even get refunds for either HoF or nerfs, that's just someting blizzard does to keep their pr high, so why should we do it for buffs
I really wish it wasn't out of my control. So many awesome memories, strong foot forward though.
don't be sorry, it's not your fault, hey if you have crappy twitch overlords that prioritizes "bigger fanbases" it isn't your fault, it's blizzard's fault for making their game not appealing enough!
jokes aside, yeah there were too many things and variables that were out of your control, so seriously, don't blame yourself, and thanks for all the good work and fun times!
0
well Imp-losion Forbidden Ritual, Feeding Time amongs plenty of other token generation warlock cards that got PO half of famed could be counted as swarm cards
0
but it's a 3 card cloggy combo that's sort of dead on your hand while you draw it vs the single card vanish
0
wee did need a treant themed deck tho, it's one of those mechanics that have been in the game forever (Cenarius and FoN) but were an afterthought for way too long, and no, Lucentbark isn't a treant, it's an ancient, they're different in wow lore.
0
1
one suggestion >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Put actual win conditions on your deck<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
0
same
34
gee do you think it''s in every deck MAYBE because it's the >>>new<<<< card and people want to play with it??, did that thought ever cross your mind??
0
this is the day they buff cards and give a free golden legendary, the traffic will be massive.
0
not really, i might be an unliked person here but i want to be here until the end.
0
more of the same, the one annoying thing is that the bosses come per wing, while for example Dr has 50 unique bosses or something like that (granted some of them are "repeats" of the same boss with a weaker/stronger deck depending on at what point of the run you face him) Dalaran heist is 75 bosses but they're locked behind each chapter which means, if you only have the first wing you'll only be able to face like 10 bosses, while if you unlock the second wing bosses from the second chapter get added to the first chapter, and so on and so forth, ie, you wont get to fight the carousel on any of the wings if you dont own the third wing, while if you own the third wing you could possibly find the carousel in a first wing run, so in order for the content to be actually as replayable as even RR you have to have unlocked at least 3 wings to even have a decent pool of bosses to play against.
imho, it's ok if you dont get characters for free and unlock when you pay for the wings, i'm fine with anomaly mode only unlocking if you own all the wings, what i'm not fine with is with the bosses, the core gameplay of the run being locked behind a paywall
0
thats a cool idea on paper but doesnt work in practice, in fact there have been a bunch of card games that tried this approach to solve the entdecking problem and they ended up dying because people felt tey couldnt catch up and had to spend a ton of money, this happened to magi and a bunch of odl star wars tcgs
0
that's more of a Genn an Baku were and mistake and should be deleted/reworked problem rather than the card being "nerfed" for Genn decks because objectively the card got way stronger.
0
Unpopular opinion here but according to the terms of service we shouldn't even get refunds for either HoF or nerfs, that's just someting blizzard does to keep their pr high, so why should we do it for buffs
1
why Frostyfeet of course, if there are two Ragnaros cards, two Elise cards and two hemet cards, why can't there be two Frostyfeet cards??
1
don't be sorry, it's not your fault, hey if you have crappy twitch overlords that prioritizes "bigger fanbases" it isn't your fault, it's blizzard's fault for making their game not appealing enough!
jokes aside, yeah there were too many things and variables that were out of your control, so seriously, don't blame yourself, and thanks for all the good work and fun times!