• 2

    posted a message on Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest

    Lich King can be replaced by Ysera but they don't exactly fulfill the same role.

    Posted in: Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest
  • 2

    posted a message on Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest

    Ideally Amara is your greater healing potion, I would not suggest fitting the potion in because this deck is already way too heavy on 4's. 

    Posted in: Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest
    Quote from Chimera >>

    What does a real deck entail? Tell me more.

     Thanks for the reply. I mean, this is one of the greediest decks I have seen in this expansion. How well do you do against aggro and midrange decks?
    I do admit my diction was a bit misleading. I did not mean to suggest that this deck was a joke or anything along the line, just that it comes across me as being flawed in a major way, seeing aggro is the perpetual meta of Hearthstone. In fact I love me some wallet decks, one of goals when deckbuilding that I would not like to admit is that I try to use the maximum number of legendaries possible. I'm the kind of person that wants to put Jarraxus and Lich King into a zoolock deck because I don't think the number of legendary in my deck is high enough.
     
    Back on topic. I made the following adjustments. I'm not suggesting you should listen to my advice, I just wanted to share my opinion here. 

    - thoughsteal
    - onyx bishop
    - prophet velen
    - shallow gravedigger
    - Arfus
    - polluted hoarder
    - skelemancer

    + crystalline oracle
    + mistress of mixture
    + volatile elemental
    + curious glimmerroot
    + happy ghoul
    + tar creeper
    + elise the trailblazer

    Posted in: Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on TICTAC’S KFT SHADOWREAPER KAZAKUS HIGHLANDER PRIEST ADAPT BY NESS
    Quote from JokD >>

    I several times discovered The Lich King. Furthermore, Stonehill Defender can help you discover a card for your next turn, supporting your temp.

     Imo having 1 potential good discover result is not good enough. Plus, this is already a greedy deck, it doesn't need more value.
    Posted in: TICTAC’S KFT SHADOWREAPER KAZAKUS HIGHLANDER PRIEST ADAPT BY NESS
  • 0

    posted a message on Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest

    No offense to the creator but can anyone confirm this is a real deck? I keep feeling like this will get run over by every aggro deck as well as jade druid and murloc paladin (which is like, 50% of the ladder right now).

    I tried this myself in unranked but my unranked MMR is fucked and I get matched against people whose entire deck may or may not contain any non-basic cards.

    Posted in: Shadowreaper N'zoth Wallet Priest
  • 0

    posted a message on Legend Jade N'zoth Rogue KFT [S41]
    Quote from FearBear >>

    I don't have Valeera, will the deck work without her? 

     Pretty much the exact same deck existed before KFT, so yes, but that doesn't mean that deck is equally as strong as this one.
    Posted in: Legend Jade N'zoth Rogue KFT [S41]
  • 0

    posted a message on TICTAC’S KFT SHADOWREAPER KAZAKUS HIGHLANDER PRIEST ADAPT BY NESS

    What is stonehill defender doing in this deck? What is it trying to discover? Lich King and Obsidian statue? Why not play tar creeper instead?

    Posted in: TICTAC’S KFT SHADOWREAPER KAZAKUS HIGHLANDER PRIEST ADAPT BY NESS
  • 0

    posted a message on Causal MMR reset
    Quote from 4wd >>

    Casual MMR is changing very fast in case of lose/win streaks. I also often play now vs weak players now after I start playing quest decks in casual.

    That would make sense. It has been a while since I used a real deck in causal xD.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Causal MMR reset

    For some reason I'm now matched against people with cards like Bloodfen Raptor in paladin in causal. And they are not smurfs either, I can clearly see. Has someone else's causal MMR been reset?

    P.S. I have been making decks designed only to complete daily quests (decks like 30 1 mana cards or 30 class cards) that should have 0% win rate (astonishingly I have won games with decks like that thanks not to me). Maybe the game notices that and think I'm a new player? I don't think that's how matchmaking works but it seems to be the only reasonable explanation.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on Semi-control Dragon Warrior

    Yeah N'zoth dragon is the other kind of control dragon warrior, but I don't like it since you can't play too many dragon synergy cards to make room for deathrattle cards. That does not make it worse though, it's a matter of preference.

    '

    Posted in: Semi-control Dragon Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Semi-control Dragon Warrior

    That is really hard to say since they are of different deck archetypes, which in turn means they perform differently against different opponents. Try them all out and go with your favorite :P

    Posted in: Semi-control Dragon Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on thoughts with my control dragon deck?

    Hi all,

    I made this deck. So far it has worked pretty well, but I would like some comments on it. I would say the unique thing about this deck is that it is missing staple cw cards like Acolyte of Pain or Slam in favor of a higher dragon count of 8.

    Theoretically it is great against midrange and aggro decks due to the variety of cards that deal with small minions, but I say theoretically because it doesn't have much draw, since I couldn't fit Acolyte of Pain or Slam in the deck. Against control it mainly relies on Brann Bronzebeard + Netherspite Historian (or 2) to discover giant dragons, although it still can't beat extremely greedy decks.

    I have been wanting to fit Acolyte of Pain and Revenge in the deck, but don't know what cards to replace. I don't run Chillmaw only because I don't have it. Any comment or advice are appreciated.

    Thanks,

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Control warrior without slam

    Hi all,

    Is it a bad idea to have no slam or blood to ichor in control warior? I'm using a control dragon deck and want to replace slam with alexstrasza's champion. 2 mana 3/3 charge is just too good, even if you charge her to her death immediately.

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on revenge vs doomsayer vs bash in control warrior

    I really want to include doomsayer since I play lots of Reno (and therefore lots of doomsayer), but am reluctant since few cw decks run it. I'm not a fun of revenge or bash, revenge because control warrior doesn't get down to 12 hp much and bash because it is 3 mana deal 3 damage. Which one should I use? Does it even matter?

    Thanks,

    Posted in: Warrior
  • 0

    posted a message on Is chillmaw necessary for control dragon warrior?

    NO, the only reason Chillmaw is included in decks nowadays is because of N'zoth,  If you wouldn't mind, can I see your current decklist so I can make a suggestion? If not, keep in mind that Dragon Warrior is usually Aggro/Midrange

     

    Cheers

     I know dragon warrior is a tempo deck, I'm just deliberately going for a control variant because control is my thing. I wasn't really making any innovations with my deck so I don't think you would see anything unusual there, I do have 2 Alexstrasza's champion, gorehowl and grommash, no acolyte or blood to ichor in my deck but it is still up to revision.
    Posted in: Warrior
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.