Hearthpwn

Wild is not supposed to be broken. Wild is supposed to have a pretty high power level, yes. There is a difference. A card game with a broken deck/combination means something that cannot be dealt with; something that takes any interactive/fun for the opponent. If a deck allows a player to play alone/to have insta win regularly, which is the case of big priest and the new warlock, then this a problem that needs to be fixed.

I don't think this price chart is up to date. In Brazil the overall price for card packs got lower, perhaps changes have occurred in other countries too. On a side note, if you're a F2P and you're happy enough as it is I don't recommend to buy any bundle. It's really a downward spiral, at least it was for me – "Well, since I already spent money in this game I better not throw it away" etc...

Hey, have someone tested this deck in the current meta? I'm crafting a few Wild legendaries (post-TGT player) and wanted do grab Malorne, but I don't know any decks with him. Should this one be a good start?

Are they really not going to do anything about this? It's SO frustrating as a control player to know that if you don't go aggro and beat them before this is in game it's simply not possible to interact with it after.

Honestly, I can't stand Kingsbane anymore. It's impossible to beat this shit with any control deck. Once they have Lifesteal, concede button already. Blizzard needs to give us a way to stop this weapon, 'cause there ain't one. They just need one legendary weapon, spells and shit to draw cards. It's ridiculous.

She should be a hero.

If ya'll can't understand why a card whose graphic design is essentially BDSM joke might be of questionable appropriateness in a game marketed to young teenagers, you've got deeper issues than living in fear that "the feminists" are coming to take way your hypersexualized comic book fantasies.

Immune characters can't be damaged, and can't be targeted by their opponent.

They can still be destroyed by untargeted effects (such as Twisting Nether), randomly targeted destruction (such as Convincing Infiltrator) or destruction effects which 'automatically' target them (such as Vaporize).

They can also still have any other similar AoE effects affect them, so long as it isn't damage. They could be healed by a Circle of Healing, for example.

Immune just means that it cant take dmg

Nah, it made you salty as f*ck that's why you felt the need to make this thread. It's ok mate, it happens to the best of us.

so you think buffs is the solution, however, you haven't brought any buff ideas.

This is the kind of thread I have been wanting to see, completely agree.  

Quote from Fortenbrass >>

In every single thread discussing the balance of the Wild format, there is always one or two comments about how Wild is meant to be broken, or that Wild is a dumpster format where old sets rot for eternity. Wild is just as much a part of Hearthstone as Standard, and its balance is important. People who play Wild want to have fun just as much as people who play Standard, but they are treated as second class citizens. Blizzard's attitude towards Wild is expected. Standard has a much larger player base and is much more expensive in the long term, so Blizzard dismisses problems with the Wild format.

My problem is with people who treat Wild players as idiots for playing a garbage format with unbalanced cards because they hate how much fun Standard is. Even popular streamers like Toast hold this belief, and I think that this attitude contributes to the toxicity in the Hearthstone community. Wild is a fun format and people who play it shouldn't be judged for doing so. 

 Damn, you’re actually correct. One of the few new threads these days that is coherent and addresses a prevalent issue.

In every single thread discussing the balance of the Wild format, there is always one or two comments about how Wild is meant to be broken, or that Wild is a dumpster format where old sets rot for eternity. Wild is just as much a part of Hearthstone as Standard, and its balance is important. People who play Wild want to have fun just as much as people who play Standard, but they are treated as second class citizens. Blizzard's attitude towards Wild is expected. Standard has a much larger player base and is much more expensive in the long term, so Blizzard dismisses problems with the Wild format.

My problem is with people who treat Wild players as idiots for playing a garbage format with unbalanced cards because they hate how much fun Standard is. Even popular streamers like Toast hold this belief, and I think that this attitude contributes to the toxicity in the Hearthstone community. Wild is a fun format and people who play it shouldn't be judged for doing so. 

Quote from Gunnolf >>

It's a highroll deck, no different than Big Priest.

 

 Pretty much, only that the highroll can be even more savage.

I don't like it, and it's frustrating to lose against because it always comes down to "oh, you had exactly those cards on hand and those in your deck?!" but it's far from unbeatable.

My main concern with it is that Big Priest was frustrating enough and didn't need a competitor on that level of unfairness.