For people that's opening a lot of packs and paying loads of money, you do know that your chances of winning are still the same like now and before and you'll still get rekt by randomness right? Don't trick yourself into thinking that by opening 200+ packs you'll be able to win more, you'll still get full on rekt +50% of time even with those Death Knight cards and lose. Just trying to state the obvious.
- Registered User
Member for 7 years, 4 months, and 8 days
Last active Mon, Mar, 29 2021 07:19:10
- 0 Followers
- 1,063 Total Posts
- 1466 Thanks
Aug 8, 2017ZeroAndKira posted a message on How many packs are you going to open when KOTFT starts?Posted in: General DiscussionI don't buy cards because I wanna win more, I buy them because I wanna have more fun. More cards means more different decks I can build and thus more fun I can have playing this game.
Feb 8, 2017Posted in: Hired GunExcept no one plays Hired Gun either so it isn't powercreep because of that as well.
Jan 1, 2017ZeroAndKira posted a message on In this thread, we name things that the Hearthstone community does not hate.Posted in: General Discussion
Dec 26, 2016Posted in: Fan Creations
I'm surprised the examples of Mulch, Sap, Freezing Trap, and Vanish weren't given. I think they might have prompted more variety in thinking than just Curse of Rafaam. And that's without getting into cards that just outright have your opponent draw cards like Naturalize, Coldlight Oracle, Grove Tender, and Dancing Swords, though that might not be what you were going for.I could have added in Mulch, but the idea was to put a card into only your opponents hand, One of the contestants had asked if their design could put cards into both players hands and I said "no," it has to go into your opponents hand only (and not via draw).Ah, well then there goes my theory on the second one putting the Discovered card in both your and your opponent's hand. =PWelp, now I really have no idea which way to vote. If both players got the card, I would definitely have voted for Dwarven Explorer. Right now, I just don't see a use for it, even in mill decks it's pretty bad.Most of what needs to said has already been said, but I think the Mechanical Greench could (and should) have simply been worded 'Battlecry: Give your opponent a 'Christmas Spirit' card'. Look at cards like Elite Tauren Chieftain or White Eyes, they don't specify what the token is, and that saves space on the card. If it had been worded like that, I would probably have voted for it. For me, more than 4 lines of text has almost always been instant disqualification.It's worded with Curse of Rafaam in mind, as it should be. They made the wording of the curse stupidly long so what can you do.
Dec 22, 2016Posted in: Rogue
Allow me to play the world's smallest violin for you.You sure that's a good idea? It must've cost a lot, so it would be a shame if you were to accidentally drop it and never find it.
Dec 21, 2016ZeroAndKira posted a message on Clockwork Card Dealer - Standard is This Week's Tavern BrawlPosted in: News
What, why is it standard? That's no fun. Atleast there's no secret paladin, but still.
Dec 21, 2016Posted in: General DiscussionThalnos is a recent legendary since when lmao. And when did aggro decks start running him.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Mar 11, 2021Tibainium posted a message on Pre-Launch Party & Pre-Release before Forged in the Barrens Launches March 30!Posted in: News
Almost none of these streamers even play constructed...
Feb 28, 2021TheHiddenNinja7 posted a message on Changed Core Cards Will Replace Legacy Cards with Same Name - Discussion OngoingPosted in: News
Pfp checks out.
And I agree. Currently, if you're at low health you can play Jaraxxus to restore your hp to 15, like using alextrasza on yourself. The new one can't do that. It only gives 5 armor.
Plus it seems like you'll no longer be able to Sac Pact your own face.
Feb 28, 2021LoopTheWanderer posted a message on Changed Core Cards Will Replace Legacy Cards with Same Name - Discussion OngoingPosted in: News
if they make new versions of boar and Bluegill for wild, I really want the old version of Jaraxxus, it makes no sense to remove the demon version and replace him with a generic hero card that we have over a dozen of already. his jankiness is his main selling point right now. the new version is an okay card, but it shouldn't exclude us from playing Jaraxxus as he is meant to be in Wild.
Feb 28, 2021ArcyroX posted a message on Changed Core Cards Will Replace Legacy Cards with Same Name - Discussion OngoingPosted in: News
I aint gonna lie, for months I've never seen a Boar or a Bluegill in any of the games I played in wild ranked, so I dont think leaving them there would be a problem. Maybe they can consider this when they gonna print a card that would create a broken combo with them. Like announce the card, then discuss it with community.
Wild is full of secret mages, big/raza priests, kingsbane rogues and odd paladins; especially the first two. I'd say they should also consider nerfing very popular / OP wild decks just to increase the variety at least. I never see Hunters in wild, never see midrange decks. Wild has only 2 deck types: either super aggro, you lose on turn 3 or 4; or super controlly OTK decks (well, big priest is kinda like otk, like they make you lose your hopes in one turn).
Feb 28, 2021Thanatos2k posted a message on Changed Core Cards Will Replace Legacy Cards with Same Name - Discussion OngoingPosted in: News
Extremely dumb change. EXTREMELY DUMB. Should have just made new cards.
I hate charge combo cards and am happy they're removing it from Standard, but removing it from the game? What a racket by Activision. Everything Iksar does seems to be for the worse.
Oct 17, 2016Dragnlord666 posted a message on Competitive Tavern Brawls with Entry Fees Coming Soon!Posted in: News
Aaaah the potential.
Imagine this would be released on christmas, or the period around it.
Just imagine it ....
Imagine that it would've been free, everybody gets a free try.
Just 1 trial thats it.
Are you imagining it?
And while we are at it, instead of the glorious standard - own card collection we would be drafting our decks.
INSTEAD WE GET THIS, PAY WAAAAAY TOO MUCH FOR WAAAAAAAAAY TOO LITTLE
UNLESS YOU ARE THE FKING RNG GODS THEMSELVES AND MIRACULOUSLY GET 12 WINS
LIKE THAT IS EVER GOING TO -----keeping this post as childfriendly as possible-----king GOIN TO MOTHER----god this hard----ING HAPPEN !!!!
SO WHAT? YOU GIVE MORE TO THE ONES WHO ALREADY HAVE ALOT AND JUST mqfmisudgiuidshdfhsihfsiofhsiu
Ok *uhum* i really think this is stupid :)
Rewards only get interesting at a way to high wincount, you play standard (which sucks), you pay alot ...
Feels bad man
Oct 16, 2016Hieii posted a message on Would You Pay For New Features? Blizzard Asks in a New Hearthstone SurveyPosted in: News
Their payment for adding new features is that we continue playing the game. Let's be honest, a lot of players are leaving the game because they are bored. A player that continue playing is a potential card pack buyer when expansion come out.
For me the only thing that can be sell is content that is not essential to the game operation like new skins.
Oct 20, 2016Hieii posted a message on Hearthstone Patch 15181 - Murloc Card Changes, Bug Fixes, New Dailies, and More!Posted in: News
50 Gold - Inspiring - Use your Hero Power 30 times.2 years later.
- To post a comment, please login or register a new account.