Hearthpwn

Quote from ChessPlayer1 >>

For people that's opening a lot of packs and paying loads of money, you do know that your chances of winning are still the same like now and before and you'll still get rekt by randomness right? Don't trick yourself into thinking that by opening 200+ packs you'll be able to win more, you'll still get full on rekt +50% of time even with those Death Knight cards and lose. Just trying to state the obvious.

Quote from Marchenoir >>

Quote from ZeroAndKira >>

Nope, Ironfur is a beast so no power creep.

 Except no one plays the grizzly for its beast synergy, making HG an effective powercreep. Grizzly is an arena 3-3 taunt. That's it.

Welcome Bundle

Quote from Mewdrops >>

Quote from Asylum_Rhapsody >>

Quote from RedneckBudha >>

Quote from Asylum_Rhapsody >>

I'm surprised the examples of Mulch, Sap, Freezing Trap, and Vanish weren't given. I think they might have prompted more variety in thinking than just Curse of Rafaam. And that's without getting into cards that just outright have your opponent draw cards like Naturalize, Coldlight Oracle, Grove Tender, and Dancing Swords, though that might not be what you were going for.

 I could have added in Mulch, but the idea was to put a card into only your opponents hand, One of the contestants had asked if their design could put cards into both players hands and I said "no," it has to go into your opponents hand only (and not via draw). 

Ah, well then there goes my theory on the second one putting the Discovered card in both your and your opponent's hand. =P 

 Welp, now I really have no idea which way to vote. If both players got the card, I would definitely have voted for Dwarven Explorer. Right now, I just don't see a use for it, even in mill decks it's pretty bad.

Most of what needs to said has already been said, but I think the Mechanical Greench could (and should) have simply been worded 'Battlecry: Give your opponent a 'Christmas Spirit' card'. Look at cards like Elite Tauren Chieftain or White Eyes, they don't specify what the token is, and that saves space on the card. If it had been worded like that, I would probably have voted for it. For me, more than 4 lines of text has almost always been instant disqualification.

Congratulations, you are now part of the true cancer in hearthstone.

Quote from GhostTrickx1 >>

Allow me to play the world's smallest violin for you.

Sooo where's Renounce Warlock?

What, why is it standard? That's no fun. Atleast there's no secret paladin, but still.

Quote from selcuky >>

If they wouldn't create low mana aggro Legendary/Epic cards you may right but now look most recent Legends, Bloodmage Thalnos, Patches the Pirate etc.

Even cheapest playable aggro decks starts at 5K+ craft cost.

So it's just a better Sergeant Sally.

Almost none of these streamers even play constructed...

Pfp checks out.

And I agree. Currently, if you're at low health you can play Jaraxxus to restore your hp to 15, like using alextrasza on yourself. The new one can't do that. It only gives 5 armor.

Plus it seems like you'll no longer be able to Sac Pact your own face.

if they make new versions of boar and Bluegill for wild, I really want the old version of Jaraxxus, it makes no sense to remove the demon version and replace him with a generic hero card that we have over a dozen of already. his jankiness is his main selling point right now. the new version is an okay card, but it shouldn't exclude us from playing Jaraxxus as he is meant to be in Wild.

I aint gonna lie, for months I've never seen a Boar or a Bluegill in any of the games I played in wild ranked, so I dont think leaving them there would be a problem. Maybe they can consider this when they gonna print a card that would create a broken combo with them. Like announce the card, then discuss it with community.

Wild is full of secret mages, big/raza priests, kingsbane rogues and odd paladins; especially the first two. I'd say they should also consider nerfing very popular / OP wild decks just to increase the variety at least. I never see Hunters in wild, never see midrange decks. Wild has only 2 deck types: either super aggro, you lose on turn 3 or 4; or super controlly OTK decks (well, big priest is kinda like otk, like they make you lose your hopes in one turn).

Extremely dumb change.  EXTREMELY DUMB.  Should have just made new cards.

I hate charge combo cards and am happy they're removing it from Standard, but removing it from the game?  What a racket by Activision.  Everything Iksar does seems to be for the worse.

The day I get punished for being skilled in arena is the day I quit the game. Seriously, wtf?!

Aaaah the potential.
Imagine this would be released on christmas, or the period around it.
Just imagine it ....
Imagine that it would've been free, everybody gets a free try.
Just 1 trial thats it.
Are you imagining it?
And while we are at it, instead of the glorious standard - own card collection we would be drafting our decks.
...

BUT NOOOOOOOOO
INSTEAD WE GET THIS, PAY WAAAAAY TOO MUCH FOR WAAAAAAAAAY TOO LITTLE
UNLESS YOU ARE THE FKING RNG GODS THEMSELVES AND MIRACULOUSLY GET 12 WINS
LIKE THAT IS EVER GOING TO -----keeping this post as childfriendly as possible-----king GOIN TO MOTHER----god this hard----ING HAPPEN !!!!
SO WHAT? YOU GIVE MORE TO THE ONES WHO ALREADY HAVE ALOT AND JUST mqfmisudgiuidshdfhsihfsiofhsiu

Ok *uhum* i really think this is stupid :)
Rewards only get interesting at a way to high wincount, you play standard (which sucks), you pay alot ...

Feels bad man

They don't give a time for released because if they did so many people would log in at that time and crash the servers...But it would be nice for once if EU got an expansion before NA.