Hearthpwn

Quote from Legend504 >>

Hey guys!

I have a question:
Why is Thekal in tier1, but  Jan'alai is in tier2? 
They are both good class cards that fit really well into some specific decks, but they are not the cards that make those decks work.
Thekal is good in OTK Paladin, but he is not the best card of that deck and Jan'alai is good in Big Spell Mage or in Odd Mage (both versions, the control and the midrange), but she is also not the best card of those decks. They are both great additions to those decks, but not essential. 
So why is Thekal in tier1 and Jan'alai is in tier2? (I don't know in which tier they should be, but I feel like they should be in the same tier.)

Firebat made a video few days ago about Thekal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR9WYSOjbT4

 I'm also not sold on Thekal being that good. He is kinda like Keleseth, but the upside is not that high early on to have a bad late game draw. I think both are good tier 2 cards.

Quote from jwbrain >>

Quote from Ace100ace200 >>

Quote from Velerios >>

Quote from RavenSunHP >>

Odd Rogue and Even Shaman are relatively simple decks. And powerful. They also use some OP cards that could go with a nerf.

But they are not highroll, ********, and outright broken as Big Priest is. Not even close.

Big Priest does not need a nerf. It needs to be reduced to meme level.

 

 Sorry, but where is Even shaman not broken: 70% winrate is not broken: Having now teching in Burst with windfury that allows them to deal 14 damage with their 4 mana 7/7 is ok. Yet big priest is outright broken when they at least have some hard counter (Never really lost with mill rogue against big priest; except for missplays)

And Odd Rogue simply destroys the opponent turn 1-2 with their weapon and aggro you down thanks to the pirate-package. And yet, everything ok here too. Barnes really need a nerf, and just for opening up space for other control-type priest-decks too that are hard-countered by big priest.

And sorry, but where is even-shaman fair? I play it often enough to rank up to rank 5; and it's not fair at all. Turn 1 totem, turn 2 Totem Golem, Turn 3 you use flametongue-totem and totally destroy the enemy board with both totems, turn 4 4 mana 7/7, turn 5 totem and Thing from Below. So really, what's fair and balanced in this case (and yes, this exact thing happens often enough to count. Not forgetting the burst from Windspeaker and Windfury-spell, Crackle and Jade Lightning. And Jade Claws can deal with nearly everything on turn 1/2.

And if you want to nerf it to meme-level then you really only want to rant against it. The only real issue of Big Priest is Barnes; this card is really ******** in this deck, but the rest not really.

What i would have wanted since LONG TIME is a tech-card against big priest, something that summons worthless tokens on the enemy board. This would make random-resurrections far more unstable and people could tech them in and make big priest far more unreliable. Or a card that deals with the graveyard: One example: A Battlecry that let resurrection-effects summon random minions instead of the one that died for the rest of the game; this would make big priest as reliable as evolve-shaman.  This, together with Loatheb could totally destroy Big Priest; yet you would still need to tech it in. Hearthstone needs more tech-cards against popular decks instead of adding more and more filler-cards (or a filler-expansion like Rastakhans Rumble)

Still: 70% winrate-shaman is fine, but Big Priest with a much lower winrate isn't? Sorry, but no, rationally I can't really understand this.

 There is. The new Saronite Taskmaster can easily be run in Odd Rogue.

 Actually, there are a lot more cards than just that. I happened to look it up recently and was surprised by how many there were. Not saying that most of them are good cards though.

 Thats why i pointed this out, because it is actually usable and provides a good counter against big priest. It very bad against Even Shaman tho, because Flametongue is a card and every token discounts their Sea Giants.

You do not hav to play it if it's not fun for you. I, personally, liked the challenge, although i did make it at the 3rd try. You just have to take the craziest combo potential shrines.

You might just be bad.

Quote from Sudosev >>

I only find it frustrating when I'm playing OTK Pala and I meet some Mecha'thun deck.  Even with time-out up, I die.  I know that's intended but my hero is supposedly immune so, kinda makes me want to rage quit at that point.  If immunity doesn't counter Mecha'thun, what does.

Nothing, because winning > immune.

And why are you raging about this? If you play such a matchups it's rng based which player gets their powerful turns (Call to arms on 5, Uther on 9). That's how it's meant to be.

Quote from Highwayman37 >>

Quote from Ace100ace200 >>

1) Nzoth Druid might be a fringe place for this card but it's mostly too slow.

2) If you like playing Reno Mage Anomalus can help you out as a board clear. Not sure itf it's the best option, but better than a lot of the others and it hinders the options your opponent can do.

3) Paletress is just to RNg heavy to guarantee a good outcome -> garbage.

4) Best Demon by far.

5) One of the best neutrals.

6) The new monkey for 3 Mana does the same so it's dust for sure.

7) Kragg is played in Pirate Warrior if that's your desire i would keep him.

 That monkey has a name.  And his name is Banana Buffoon.

 Sorry, i could not remember it. Thanks for pointing it out. ^^

Not superior but from my experience they are much nicer. Back in a day when i didn't auto-squelch people more often than not aggro players would spam emotes, roping when they have lethal, roping when they are losing etc. Just general BM. Priest players are exception, no matter what deck they play, they always BM. 
Control Warriors, Warlock, midrange shaman, paladin etc. usually are just regular players who are trying to have a good time. For whatever reason aggro players and Priest players, especially priest players will do everything in their power to make experience worse for you. Not sure why.
Ofcourse there are exceptions to this, i'm just talking from my experience that doesn't mean that aggro players are bad people, perhaps it was just a luck of a draw that i got matched against those few toxic examples. 

Quote from Kaladin >>

superior?  no.  more difficult to play?  arguably.

 This is wrong on so many levels you can't even understand.

It's neither more difficult nor superior.Just a different style.

you can't blame boar for quest rogue being broken, wtf

You are right. Hearthstone should be a game about pillow fights, feather tickles and butt plugs. Stop with this shit. LOL

You get a free legendary in launch, you have a legendary for sure in the first 10 packs in the expansion, if you don't open in 30 packs after that you are very close to open in few more packs.

And probably is not a bug, only terrible luck, the same happens to me with K&C... :(

I don't really care. If you made it to Legend, why not flash your flair?

*it hardly has a chance

Given that they reached Legend at least once and knowing the kind of grind you need to do to achieve it, I think they earned the right to wear that card back whenever they want. I don't do it myself but I'm just saying those guys have all the right to do it.

 This deck looks like a hybrid between Mech Hunter and BombHunter. How do you win against Reno builds with this? Also don't act childlishly and take some critisism if you are posting decks on forum. You've posted it to improve it overall and not only for promotion right? ;)

Why does your aggro deck have explosive trap? Why do you have a missile launcher? Don’t you want your osn mechd to stick for the head? And why do you have feign if your only deathrattles are from bombs, shredder, chip, and infest? Tbh this deck doesn’t look refined at all and is way to spread out using worse versions of other cards.