had some pretty good runs in tavern brawl and reached suprisingly fast the 100 gold cap, which is a shame, just pretends not to play anymore until it resets. im sure they are some hardcore player out there , who farm like once in a week on 1 day 100 gold..
so why not increase the gold cap to 150 gold ? seems much more reasonable.
I never even reach the cap lol. Ain't nobody got time for that... Idk blizz could bc if you already grind 30 wins each day for the cap, you deserve 150 gold lol. Id never have the patience with all the net decks.. If they do this, please remove gold in general from casual so their aren't even more net deckers in casual
Also increasing it to 150 would mean you'd have to win 45 games, which most people don't have that amount of time. This means that only people using bots would really benefit.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I don't have something witty about this deck, I just like it because Malygos is fun.
As for the thread: it's already hard to get to 100 gold cap playing normally, thus there is no reason for change. On top of that if you were to increase the cap, more and more people will tune to bots, because it's simply profitable.
Oh and basically after winning like 6 games you merely earn 20% of what some more invested players earn, increasing the gold cap also increases that gap, meaning already rich people get even richer (and spend less money, duh).
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
the reason 100 gold is the daily limit is to stop bots from infinite farming so increasing it to 150 I think would only profit them more, it's a shame botters ruin it for everyone.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
Cut that in half if he plays aggro :)
Nope. The highest winrate right now is Odd Rogue at 57%. I was being generous with both the game length and winrate anyway.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
Cut that in half if he plays aggro :)
Nope. The highest winrate right now is Odd Rogue at 57%. I was being generous with both the game length and winrate anyway.
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
I never said that, first off. And if you're going to use above average players to justify raising the floor, you also have to take into account the under-average players who will still grind to 45 wins with a less than 50% winrate. Someone with a 100% winrate (which is impossible) would still need at least 7 hours.
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
If you're going to use above average players to justify raising the floor, you also have to take into account the under-average players who will still grind to 45 wins with a less than 50% winrate. Someone with a 100% winrate (which is impossible) would still need at least 7 hours.
I take into account that the below average player will never go for 45 wins a day. Obviously if you’re going to grind 45 wins a day you definitely know what you’re doing. Raising the gold floor would mostly affect the hardcore players who play a ton.
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
If you're going to use above average players to justify raising the floor, you also have to take into account the under-average players who will still grind to 45 wins with a less than 50% winrate. Someone with a 100% winrate (which is impossible) would still need at least 7 hours.
I take into account that the below average player will never go for 45 wins a day. Obviously if you’re going to grind 45 wins a day you definitely know what you’re doing. Raising the gold floor would mostly affect the hardcore players who play a ton.
And thats not healthy. 12 hours a day is NOT healthy. If you grind consitantly, thats half your life on a video game! Why are you defending that?
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
If you're going to use above average players to justify raising the floor, you also have to take into account the under-average players who will still grind to 45 wins with a less than 50% winrate. Someone with a 100% winrate (which is impossible) would still need at least 7 hours.
I take into account that the below average player will never go for 45 wins a day. Obviously if you’re going to grind 45 wins a day you definitely know what you’re doing. Raising the gold floor would mostly affect the hardcore players who play a ton.
And thats not healthy. 12 hours a day is NOT healthy. If you do that consitently thats half your life on a video game. Why are you defending that?
There’s no way it takes 12 hours to get 45 wins if you’re a good player playing odd Rogue. Anyway if someone likes the game that much and wants to play 12 hours a day, why do you care ? Let him be.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
had some pretty good runs in tavern brawl and reached suprisingly fast the 100 gold cap, which is a shame, just pretends not to play anymore until it resets. im sure they are some hardcore player out there , who farm like once in a week on 1 day 100 gold..
so why not increase the gold cap to 150 gold ? seems much more reasonable.
I never even reach the cap lol. Ain't nobody got time for that... Idk blizz could bc if you already grind 30 wins each day for the cap, you deserve 150 gold lol. Id never have the patience with all the net decks.. If they do this, please remove gold in general from casual so their aren't even more net deckers in casual
150 cap per day would be too much imo because then you could just load up two accounts and farm a free arena entrance every day.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
Also increasing it to 150 would mean you'd have to win 45 games, which most people don't have that amount of time. This means that only people using bots would really benefit.
I don't have something witty about this deck, I just like it because Malygos is fun.
Why are you not showing us results of the poll?
As for the thread: it's already hard to get to 100 gold cap playing normally, thus there is no reason for change. On top of that if you were to increase the cap, more and more people will tune to bots, because it's simply profitable.
Oh and basically after winning like 6 games you merely earn 20% of what some more invested players earn, increasing the gold cap also increases that gap, meaning already rich people get even richer (and spend less money, duh).
and so what ?
You do realise that farming 30 wins is pretty difficult for the average player, what's wrong with giving more gold to the hardcore players ?
the cap is just dumb.. unless it's there to prevent bots from taking over
Exactly what it's there for lol
That wouldn't be good for anyone.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
the reason 100 gold is the daily limit is to stop bots from infinite farming so increasing it to 150 I think would only profit them more, it's a shame botters ruin it for everyone.
Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
Cut that in half if he plays aggro :)
Nope. The highest winrate right now is Odd Rogue at 57%. I was being generous with both the game length and winrate anyway.
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
That wouldn't be good for anyone.
If someone wins 45 games, they probably also lost around 45 games. If an average game takes 10 minutes, then someone will have played for 15 hours a day. Its not really debateable that 15 hours of screentime a day isn't healthy.
Unless you know... the player is actually good and wins more than 50% of his games
Ok, lets say he wins 60% of his games. He plays 75 games. That's still 12.5 hours.
Cut that in half if he plays aggro :)
Nope. The highest winrate right now is Odd Rogue at 57%. I was being generous with both the game length and winrate anyway.
So because the highest winrate deck right now based on ALL ranks is 57%, that means it’s not possible to pilot it better than average ? Also, you must be new if you think playing aggro gives an average length game of 10 minutes.
Two of your own accounts or just simply bot farming casual. Load up your bot, let it run all night, boom. Free Arena every day.
Kaladin's RoS Set Review
Join me at Out of Cards!
It makes no sense for anyone with a brain to farm on multiple accounts unless they’re going for high legend on multiple servers
I never said that, first off. And if you're going to use above average players to justify raising the floor, you also have to take into account the under-average players who will still grind to 45 wins with a less than 50% winrate. Someone with a 100% winrate (which is impossible) would still need at least 7 hours.
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
I take into account that the below average player will never go for 45 wins a day. Obviously if you’re going to grind 45 wins a day you definitely know what you’re doing. Raising the gold floor would mostly affect the hardcore players who play a ton.
And thats not healthy. 12 hours a day is NOT healthy. If you grind consitantly, thats half your life on a video game! Why are you defending that?
Unpopular opinion: Rogue is OP
There’s no way it takes 12 hours to get 45 wins if you’re a good player playing odd Rogue. Anyway if someone likes the game that much and wants to play 12 hours a day, why do you care ? Let him be.