• 6

    posted a message on Blizzard fanboys
    Quote from EmoGit >>
    Quote from AkiraTerion >>

    It's the internet.  People have opinions.  If you are unhappy or unwilling to deal with them, don't post on public forums.

    Learn to either ignore it or debate it.  It's up to you.

     Way to completely miss the point.

     So just because some people disagree with your opinion regarding the nerfs of some cards, that makes them fanboys ? It does not make any sense...

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Any memelords with infinite time on their hands?

    sorry but I don't see it happening.. ever.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Can odd paladin get from 5 to legend??

    Can the deck with the current best win rate get you to Legend starting from rank 5 ? Hmm.. difficult question I wonder.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from latinvampire >>
    Quote from Bee >>

    So after years you still couldn't break the rank 15 ?

    I don't think your deck is the problem here.

     Don't you have a pure gold set and multi-legend finishes? Please don't judge all by those standards.  This post is beneath the reasoned and articulate posts of yours I've come to enjoy. 

    Am I suppose to spread lies ? If you've been playing the game for years and still have a hard time getting to rank 15, there is a serious problem with the player, not the deck.

    Why you ask me ? Because rank 15 is not good, I don't want to insult anyone, I'm just stating a fact, as harsh as it may be. Rank 5 should be achievable by anyone who's been playing for a decent amount of time.

    For those players, I suggest you watch streamers and learn from them, that's the best way to improve.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    Not sure where you are pulling your stats from but looking at all the main sites it's spell hunter in the number 1 spot with around 58% win rate.

    This is despite the amount of counter decks that have sprang up to try and stop it.

     What sites ? As far as I know hsreplay is the best source since most players use their deck tracker. You know what it means ? It means it's the most accurate of them all.

     And you know what is more accurate than 1 day of stats? 3 or 7 days of stats.  You need a premium account to view that though.

     Those are sincest latest patch stats:

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    Not sure where you are pulling your stats from but looking at all the main sites it's spell hunter in the number 1 spot with around 58% win rate.

    This is despite the amount of counter decks that have sprang up to try and stop it.

     What sites ? As far as I know hsreplay is the best source since most players use their deck tracker. You know what it means ? It means it's the most accurate of them all.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    As I've already stated it is not a problem to have multiple good archetypes within 1 class unless it's overpowered which it clearly is.  I already said the playrate was 30%.  You can check that stuff on a site like  http://metastats.net/ or https://hsreplay.net/stats or https://www.vicioussyndicate.com/vs-data-reaper-report-116/

    The top 2 most successful decks are hunter decks followed by 3 decks that counter those hunter decks.  As Iv'e said the power of hunter is completely shaping the meta.

    The spellstone and Rexxar are the 2 most powerful cards imo and are run in all except DR hunter.  The spellstone should cost 6-7 mana or require 2 secrets to upgrade.  Rexxar should cost at least 8 mana for his power level.  Neither nerf would kill hunter just as the paladin nerf didn't kill it.  In fact it's still 1 of the best if not the best deck in the game suggesting it requires another nerf.  Fungalmancer to 6 and blessing of might to 2 would be my suggestions there.

     How is it OP ? The best Hunter deck is not even in the top 3 and all its archetypes have similar win rates to other classes.

    You know what overpowered means right ? Clearly based on those stats, Hunter isn't overpowered. It's good, not overpowered.

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from iWatchUSleep >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from iWatchUSleep >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

     Tbh if anything there is even more aggro between 5 and legend.  It's the fastest way to get there after you lose your win streak bonus from pre 5.

     

    That and the fact that the majority of top tier decks are op aggro decks.

     I'm still waiting on your statistics, sir. Bee posted one that directly counters what you said and further confirms what everyone BUT you has been saying.
    Where is your rebuttal?

     I just couldn't be bothered replying to a mindless sheep like you.  With 30% play rate there's a lot of hunter vs hunter matchups skewing the stats along with the rise of odd warrior to counter them.

    I don't need the stats to tell me hunter is a problem at the moment.  Stats can be used to tell any story you want.  The stats were linked anyway showing around 55% win rate with most of the hunter.  It was closer to 60 a week or 2 back.

     Haha your arguments are literally all over the place at this point. First you claim all your information is based on stats and now you suddenly don't need them anymore? Good stuff.

    But I'm sure your story (which little to no one agrees with) is a lot more correct than ACTUAL STATISTICS. Stay buttmad over a non-issue in your little bubble, I'll go enjoy myself a few games of Hearthstone.

     Sure go enjoy playing your hunter decks.  Probably the only decks you have.

    You are the one trying to justify a class with 30% play rate and 4 top tier decks but yet you don't think it's a problem.   Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb......

     Why is it a problem to have multiple good archetypes within a single class ? The win rates are good and on par with other tier 1 and 2 decks. Sure, there are a lot of people playing hunter right now, could you provide me stats on the hunter playrate compared to other classes ? And since you think hunter badly needs a nerf, could you tell me what would be your solution?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    All of those top tier decks need nerfs.  I've listed already 4 changes that should be made that would help balance those decks and make the meta more interesting.

    Hunter spellstone 100% needs a nerf along with a rexxar dk cost increase.  6-7 mana for the spellstone or 2 secrets to upgrade and 8 cost for rexxar.

    Cold blood and blessing of might nerfed to 2 mana and fungalmancer nerfed to 6 mana.

    That targets all the top tier decks without killing them.

     Thank god you're not in charge of the game balance, that would be a disaster.

    You have no clue what you're talking about.

    I've already proved that although Hunter is good, it is no where near as OP as you make it seem, it's just that he has multiple different good archetypes.. which is in line with the other classes and which will be completely dead in 3 months. No nerfs are needed. The difference with druid is that wild growth and nourish are classic cards and will remain in standard forever. If the DK and spellstones were classic cards, then I agree it would need a nerf since those shape the hunter archetypes and are extremely good but the fact that it rotates in 3 months and that Hunter is nowhere near tier 1 in wild as far as I know means that no nerfs are needed.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    Eh it is tier 1 along with at least 3 other hunter decks and I will keep complaining about it until it's fixed.

    It's main downfall is it's can't compete vs the more aggressive hunter decks.  The best way to counter hunter is hunter.

    You know a class is broken when that is the case.

     Stop complaining child.. the archetype will be dead from standard in 3 months

    Let hunter shine for 3 months

     Ok I'm a child for complaining about a game I love when there are clearly major issues with the design path chosen.

    We have 1 class with 4+ tier 1 decks and over 30% played rate and it's not ok for me to complain about that?  The classes that got nerfed into the ground were nowhere near this.

     You do realise that whenever big nerfs happen, there is always a class that will rise from that ?

    This is what happened a few months ago with cubelock until they nerfed it.

    Anyway as I said, in 3 months the spellstones will be gone along side the DK.. which is why it doesn't require nerfs rn.

     The point is we shouldn't have to wait 3 months when there is clearly a massive issue with your game.  When you have 9 classes and 1 class is being played more than 4 other s combined and represents the majority of the tier 1 decks that is when you make nerfs.  You don't wait 3 months for the rotation and lose half your player base in the process.

     As we can see, it is rank 4th in the tier 1 bracket and has 2 other archetypes in tier 2. That being said, it has the same win rate as other classes so I don't see the issue here. What's wrong with having multiple good archetypes within a single class ?

     

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>
    Quote from Bee >>
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    Eh it is tier 1 along with at least 3 other hunter decks and I will keep complaining about it until it's fixed.

    It's main downfall is it's can't compete vs the more aggressive hunter decks.  The best way to counter hunter is hunter.

    You know a class is broken when that is the case.

     Stop complaining child.. the archetype will be dead from standard in 3 months

    Let hunter shine for 3 months

     Ok I'm a child for complaining about a game I love when there are clearly major issues with the design path chosen.

    We have 1 class with 4+ tier 1 decks and over 30% played rate and it's not ok for me to complain about that?  The classes that got nerfed into the ground were nowhere near this.

     You do realise that whenever big nerfs happen, there is always a class that will rise from that ?

    This is what happened a few months ago with cubelock until they nerfed it.

    Anyway as I said, in 3 months the spellstones will be gone along side the DK.. which is why it doesn't require nerfs rn.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important
    Quote from MojoJojo21619 >>

    Eh it is tier 1 along with at least 3 other hunter decks and I will keep complaining about it until it's fixed.

    It's main downfall is it's can't compete vs the more aggressive hunter decks.  The best way to counter hunter is hunter.

    You know a class is broken when that is the case.

     Stop complaining child.. the archetype will be dead from standard in 3 months

    Let hunter shine for 3 months

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 2

    posted a message on After many years of Hearthstone, I finally learned something important

    So after years you still couldn't break the rank 15 ?

    I don't think your deck is the problem here.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 1

    posted a message on Is legend considered a prestigious achievement?
    Quote from _bbZ_ >>

    Dude, this is a computergame... prestige?

    Ever tried to get a girl or somebody else impressed by sayin "hey, I am gud at playin pc, do you wanna hook up with me?" Is f***ing 200 girls an achievement?

    It's your opinion and your decision how you rate it or everything...

    It takes time, needs knowledge and you'll have to get your mindset in o.k.-shape...

     

     The best post of the day goes to you, kind sir.

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Is legend considered a prestigious achievement?
    Quote from Argus_N >>

    Achieving legend really just shows how much time you spend playing, I think nothing of it. If they ever add a card back for achieving legend as F2P, then that would be prestigious in my book, even if only for the commitment.

     F2P Legend really doesn't mean anything.. you can just dust everything to craft a tier 1 deck like Odd Paladin and get to Legend.. how is that prestigious ?

    Posted in: General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.