whenever an Aggro scrub concedes against me it is the most frustrating thing ever because they literally tried to cheese a win by shitting out minions and going face like a complete idiot.
So While I feel people who play like that deserve to accept defeat, Conceding is something everyone is entitled to doing, regardless of how scummy they are.
is this not the way you play that strategy...hoping that the druid doesn't have spreading cunt in his hand...sorry you lose MOFO. The game is about answers, always has been always will be, and if you don't have one sorry YOU LOSE. NOW GFY...
Of course not. Concede saves time. Most people will, if you give them lethal, start playing random cards, emoting and such. Why give them the time, when you can already be mulliganing in the next match?
This reminds me of those players who feel that somebody conceding a game and denying them a 'proper win' is akin to their opponent bming/trolling them. Both that idea and this one, which wants to entertain the idea that players should be able to deny concedes from the opponent, are both idiotic imo.
In a physical card game you'd never see something like this suggested, where a real person would be forced to waste their time continuing to play a lost game, or to keep on passing until the opponent finally kills them. So why suggest this for virtual card games with real people simply because the person on the other side of the game board isn't physically there when their time would otherwise be wasted?
whenever an Aggro scrub concedes against me it is the most frustrating thing ever because they literally tried to cheese a win by shitting out minions and going face like a complete idiot.
So While I feel people who play like that deserve to accept defeat, Conceding is something everyone is entitled to doing, regardless of how scummy they are.
If my opponent earned it then death, but most loses are to cheesy hunter decks or evolve shenanigans and I don't give those dicks the satisfaction
is this not the way you play that strategy...hoping that the druid doesn't have spreading cunt in his hand...sorry you lose MOFO. The game is about answers, always has been always will be, and if you don't have one sorry YOU LOSE. NOW GFY...
Of course not. Concede saves time. Most people will, if you give them lethal, start playing random cards, emoting and such. Why give them the time, when you can already be mulliganing in the next match?
This reminds me of those players who feel that somebody conceding a game and denying them a 'proper win' is akin to their opponent bming/trolling them. Both that idea and this one, which wants to entertain the idea that players should be able to deny concedes from the opponent, are both idiotic imo.
In a physical card game you'd never see something like this suggested, where a real person would be forced to waste their time continuing to play a lost game, or to keep on passing until the opponent finally kills them. So why suggest this for virtual card games with real people simply because the person on the other side of the game board isn't physically there when their time would otherwise be wasted?