2 mana 2/3 "Reveal the bottom card of your opponent's deck."
That's legitimately good enough to run in the 2 slot right now for Warlock. Gives you info for what you don't have to play around. Not great but certainly playable until something better comes around.
There is also the small tilt factor potential which is also satisfying.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Anger is the punishment we give ourselves for someone else's mistake.
2 mana 2/3 "Reveal the bottom card of your opponent's deck."
That's legitimately good enough to run in the 2 slot right now for Warlock. Gives you info for what you don't have to play around. Not great but certainly playable until something better comes around.
There is also the small tilt factor potential which is also satisfying.
Yeah, that's actually an elegant way of thinking about the card. Though I really do question how useful that is. You have doomsayers, crawlers, ooze, defile....
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Its playable no more no less, you can say the same about skulking geist shuffle all 1 mana spells to the bottom of both decks.
Its a reasonable 2 drop , ive added it to my wild renolock works well. Have people here read the effect ? it destroys the next card your oponent would of drawn. Deck order is done server side at the start of the game .
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Its playable no more no less, you can say the same about skulking geist shuffle all 1 mana spells to the bottom of both decks.
Its a reasonable 2 drop , ive added it to my wild renolock works well. Have people here read the effect ? it destroys the next card your oponent would of drawn. Deck order is done server side at the start of the game .
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Its playable no more no less, you can say the same about skulking geist shuffle all 1 mana spells to the bottom of both decks.
Its a reasonable 2 drop , ive added it to my wild renolock works well. Have people here read the effect ? it destroys the next card your oponent would of drawn. Deck order is done server side at the start of the game .
Yes, sometimes you will discard a lich king and make your opponent cry. What about the times when you discard a mana wyrm and the next draw is lich king? Unless the game progresses to fatigue(which they won't, because you're playing warlock and will need to beat them before that), the card might as well read "shuffle your opponent's next draw into the bottom of his deck".
You are definitely below rank 10 if you believe a river crocolisk with this ability is worth putting into your deck. Please get acquainted on how card games(and math) work.
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Please delete your account if you believe this card is bad.
It's a 2 drop with 2/3 stats, which already makes it decent. The effect is very strong for a 2-drop. No, it does not always delete a crucial card, but it often does. Especially combo decks get wrecked.
Now explain to me why this is ''bad'' for the low low price of 2 mana.
You are definitely below rank 10 if you believe a river crocolisk with this ability is worth putting into your deck. Please get acquainted on how card games(and math) work.
Ah yes, the ''Your rank must be low if you believe this card is good'' retort. Classic idiot.
You are definitely below rank 10 if you believe a river crocolisk with this ability is worth putting into your deck. Please get acquainted on how card games(and math) work.
Ah yes, the ''Your rank must be low if you believe this card is good'' retort. Classic idiot.
Ok, then prove me wrong. Find me a single good player(as in, someone who genuinely plays/has played the game at legend ranking) who agrees with you the card is good. Showing your own rank in a pick will do too.
Or, you know, find a better objective argument to support it other than "your deck order gets set up at server side when the game starts" LOL do you even maths bro?
You may be interested in reading this link, written by someone who actually understands hearthstone:
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Its playable no more no less, you can say the same about skulking geist shuffle all 1 mana spells to the bottom of both decks.
Its a reasonable 2 drop , ive added it to my wild renolock works well. Have people here read the effect ? it destroys the next card your oponent would of drawn. Deck order is done server side at the start of the game .
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Its playable no more no less, you can say the same about skulking geist shuffle all 1 mana spells to the bottom of both decks.
Its a reasonable 2 drop , ive added it to my wild renolock works well. Have people here read the effect ? it destroys the next card your oponent would of drawn. Deck order is done server side at the start of the game .
Yes, sometimes you will discard a lich king and make your opponent cry. What about the times when you discard a mana wyrm and the next draw is lich king? Unless the game progresses to fatigue(which they won't, because you're playing warlock and will need to beat them before that), the card might as well read "shuffle your opponent's next draw into the bottom of his deck".
You are definitely below rank 10 if you believe a river crocolisk with this ability is worth putting into your deck. Please get acquainted on how card games(and math) work.
Its playable NO MORE NO LESS i dont need beast synergy in my warlock deck for some strange reason called card design. Did you read the word WILD AND RENOLOCK i go to fatigue i play reno i go to10 health i play jaraxus, its the whole point of the deck.
Assuming you cant read now or dont know what WILD RENOLOCK and PLAYABLE NO MORE NO LESS ACTUALLY MEAN.
Actually decks that are heavily combo reliant or has a key card to make deck even work well, this might be good. However, it's very minor chance that it cripples decks that are deemed competitive.
This is actually a different thing than Fel Reaver, because you wouldn't put it on a deck that require certain cards to work and risk discarding them.
Still that minor chance to ruin your opponent's combo by removing key card is not really all that good compared to many better cards you could put on 2-mana slot.
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Please delete hearthstone if you believe this card is good.
Please delete your account if you believe this card is bad.
It's a 2 drop with 2/3 stats, which already makes it decent. The effect is very strong for a 2-drop. No, it does not always delete a crucial card, but it often does. Especially combo decks get wrecked.
Now explain to me why this is ''bad'' for the low low price of 2 mana.
Would you still consider this to be a good card if it removed the bottom card of your opponents deck?
I can't wait to see people's reaction when they remove a card from their opponent's deck that is of no import and then actually helps them draw into a card that can turn the game around.
I can't wait to see people's reaction when they remove a card from their opponent's deck that is of no import and then actually helps them draw into a card that can turn the game around.
I can't wait to see people's reaction when they remove a card from their opponent's deck that is of no import and then actually helps them draw into a card that can turn the game around.
I don't think the people who think this card is good would understand what happened in that situation lol.
Which is sad. I think a more objective approach would help us better our gameplay. In a game with elements of randomness, probability is everything. Wishing something is good doesn't make it so. For every Archmage Antonidas this card removes from an Exodia mage deck, one can reasonably expect that it is equally likely to remove a Frothing Berserker from a Pirate Warrior, which literally does nothing. Worse, you just smoothed your opponent's draw if Frothing Berserker is a dead draw in this matchup.
And to be honest, even Exodia mage won't crumble just because Archmage 'Tony is gone. It will be significantly more difficult, but still capable to win.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Are you not entertained?! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
I agree. Its just not an easy concept to grasp. It requires one to separate the literal text of the card from the actual impact of the text. People have to be willing to be convinced in the first place as well.
Yeah let's all put 2 mana 2/3s that often does nothing and doesn't affect card advantage, okay. People who think this card is good just do not know how HS works. Besides, if you want to hit a combo deck then play Dirty Rat late on, it is way more consistent than this trash.
Last night I played another Warlock. Gnomeferatu ate his Bloodreaver Gul'dan, he went ''Extraordinary'' and instantly conceded. Demoralized and triggered as fuck.
Wow, such a bad card. BUT HEY ITS TOTALLY THE SAME LIEK WHEN HIS CARD WAZ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DECK SO THIS DOES NOTHING REALLY HAHA. U suck at mathematics and probability Davaretta, lol Rank 22 tryhardernoob.
Last night I played another Warlock. Gnomeferatu ate his Bloodreaver Gul'dan, he went ''Extraordinary'' and instantly conceded. Demoralized and triggered as fuck.
Wow, such a bad card. BUT HEY ITS TOTALLY THE SAME LIEK WHEN HIS CARD WAZ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DECK SO THIS DOES NOTHING REALLY HAHA. U suck at mathematics and probability Davaretta, lol Rank 22 tryhardernoob.
2 mana 2/3 "Reveal the bottom card of your opponent's deck."
That's legitimately good enough to run in the 2 slot right now for Warlock. Gives you info for what you don't have to play around. Not great but certainly playable until something better comes around.
There is also the small tilt factor potential which is also satisfying.
Anger is the punishment we give ourselves for someone else's mistake.
I love this card. The art is great and cute, the effect is potentially game-swinging, even in the late game it remains useable... Wonderful!
Lol it's just a 2 mana 2/3, it does nothing.
Actually decks that are heavily combo reliant or has a key card to make deck even work well, this might be good. However, it's very minor chance that it cripples decks that are deemed competitive.
This is actually a different thing than Fel Reaver, because you wouldn't put it on a deck that require certain cards to work and risk discarding them.
Still that minor chance to ruin your opponent's combo by removing key card is not really all that good compared to many better cards you could put on 2-mana slot.
I can't wait to see people's reaction when they remove a card from their opponent's deck that is of no import and then actually helps them draw into a card that can turn the game around.
This is potentially worse than River Crocolisk.
Edited: As if River Crocodile is a card....
"Are you not entertained?! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
"Are you not entertained?! ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!"
"What we do in life, echoes in eternity." - Maximus Decimus Meridius
I agree. Its just not an easy concept to grasp. It requires one to separate the literal text of the card from the actual impact of the text. People have to be willing to be convinced in the first place as well.
Yeah let's all put 2 mana 2/3s that often does nothing and doesn't affect card advantage, okay. People who think this card is good just do not know how HS works. Besides, if you want to hit a combo deck then play Dirty Rat late on, it is way more consistent than this trash.
Last night I played another Warlock. Gnomeferatu ate his Bloodreaver Gul'dan, he went ''Extraordinary'' and instantly conceded. Demoralized and triggered as fuck.
Wow, such a bad card. BUT HEY ITS TOTALLY THE SAME LIEK WHEN HIS CARD WAZ AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DECK SO THIS DOES NOTHING REALLY HAHA. U suck at mathematics and probability Davaretta, lol Rank 22 tryhardernoob.